Forensic report on orcas: 84 pages of platitudes despite dysfunctions at Marineland

Forensic report on orcas: 84 pages of platitudes despite dysfunctions at Marineland

Forensic report on orcas: 84 pages of platitudes despite dysfunctions at Marineland
08.04.2025
Antibes
Forensic report on orcas: 84 pages of platitudes despite dysfunctions at Marineland
Exploitation for shows

Two meetings in fifteen months, six months’ delay by Marineland before sending the documents and dozens of emails exchanged between the parties, including endless reminders to the experts. In the midst of the proceedings, the park did not see fit to inform them of Inouk’s death so that they could take part in his autopsy. They heard it from the press. They have chosen to remain silent since June 2024, and have not even deigned to send a summary sheet so that the main points can be discussed before the final report is delivered, thus preventing any upstream fine-tuning as is customary. A lack of courage that is clearly a missed opportunity, and at the limits of the rules of the exercise.

The expert report ordered by the Grasse court at One Voice’s request was delivered on April 7, 2025. We confronted Marineland about the quality of the water and the state of the tanks, but above all about the health of Inouk and Moana, then Wikie and Keijo.

Today, we are releasing this report to the general public, along with our analysis of it.

While certain undeniable elements are highlighted (such as Moana’s illnesses, or Inouk’s dental problems), the reasons for the development of this condition are never questioned, even though this was precisely the role of this procedure.

The cetacean specialists One Voice asked to take part in the expert report, Dr. P. Gallego and Dr. D. Perpiñan, as well as our three lawyers, Mses C. Lanty, C. Robert and M. Voutsas, are today joining us in denouncing the catastrophic orca management practices at Antibes Marineland, revealing that our concerns were well-founded… if it were still necessary to demonstrate this, since our request for an expert report alerted to the health of Moana and Inouk, one of whom died two weeks and the other six months after the court’s decision to order it.

We therefore deplore the lack of hindsight and critical eye of the two experts appointed by the court with regard to the elements transmitted – with bad grace – by Marineland.

The fact that One Voice requested an expert report on Inouk and Moana, and that these two orcas died less than a year after the ruling, clearly demonstrates that One Voice’s fears were justified, and that Antibes Marineland’s management of the orcas is catastrophic. Dr Pierre Gallégo One Voice veterinary consultant, cetacean specialist According to the experts, the quality of the water and the facilities do not present any anomalies in terms of animal welfare. Why have the Minister and Marineland suddenly taken to claiming in chorus that it was urgent to transfer Wikie and Keijo because of the state of the tanks? In this report, as throughout the judicial expert assessment, the suffering of each of the four orcas has been clearly demonstrated. One Voice has fought this battle for eight years, and it’s not over. We will be following Wikie and Keijo, but we also want to ensure that the unspeakable suffering endured by Inouk and Moana can spare the other captive orcas from the same ordeal. Muriel Arnal President of One Voice

Here’s our analysis:

  • Obvious errors in medical records
    Admittedly, the word “orca” is a feminine noun in French, and Moana ends with the letter a, but we were entitled to expect better: the expert report reveals that, in Moana’s file, the court’s experts made a mistake in the sex of the orca – presented as female when he was a male – revealing their disturbing lack of knowledge of the file.
  • Prolonged and inadequate treatment
    Medical records show that Moana, who was monitored from January 5, 2023 until his death on October 18, 2023 (i.e. 292 days), was subjected to heavy and repeated treatment:

    • antibiotics for 107 days (37% of the period);
    • corticoids for 31 days (11%);
    • painkillers for 36 days (12%);
    • antifungals for 21 days (7%).

These treatments, combined with invasive and painful dental procedures, among other things, show that veterinary care is far from sufficient to prevent irreversible deterioration in the animal’s state of health.

Dr. Pierre Gallégo, One Voice’s veterinary consultant and a cetacean specialist, explains:

Some major dental procedures were carried out over extremely long periods. For example, the drilling of one of Moana’s teeth began before January 5, 2023, and was completed on January 31, 2023. This was followed by post-drilling care (curettage of the pus in the drilled canal), which lasted until the day before his death on October 18, 2023. He therefore suffered from severe dental infections over a long period of time (a minimum of 292 days), requiring heavy, repeated and prolonged treatment with antibiotics and painkillers, extensive and painful dental surgeries, with infected periodontal pockets requiring rinsing to remove the pus. It’s very clear that Moana suffered from severe dental pain for a very long time, right up to his death. Who can believe for a moment that the orca was well and that One Voice’s fears were unjustified? As for the management of orcas by Antibes Marineland, it is quite simply catastrophic.”

  • Critical diagnostic omissions
    The report also points out that pathologies such as pneumonia, ulcerative gastritis and the presence of foreign bodies in Moana’s and Inouk’s bodies – diagnosed a posteriori at autopsy – were never adequately treated by Marineland’s veterinarian, whose priority was repetitive dental operations. This lack of investigation contributed to leaving pain unrelieved and aggravating the orcas’ suffering, to the point of no return. Inouk suffered from osteomyelitis of the jaw, an inflammation and destruction of the bones caused by bacteria, mycobacteria or fungi. A serious, excruciating, chronic infection, not properly treated, which means that Inouk suffered for a very long time.

Suffering attributed to an unsuitable environment

  • Consequences of stereotypical behavior
    The analysis establishes that the dental wear responsible for severe lesions in Moana and Inouk is the result of stereotypical behavior induced by boredom and suffering in captivity. Lack of behavioral enrichment and too-small tanks would have led them to bite metal walls and structures, thus favoring the appearance of chronic and severe suffering.
  • Problems observed in several orcas
    The cases of Wikie and Keijo, although deemed “normal” on the basis of the documents provided by Marineland, contrast with the damning findings on Moana and Inouk. Numerous signs, such as widespread dental erosion, dorsal fin deformities (present in 100% of adult males in captivity) and abnormal social withdrawal behaviors, testify to latent malaise and inadequate care.

Blatant inconsistencies concerning the park’s infrastructure

  • Contradiction between official declarations and reality
    All these years, in response to our warnings, the park and the Ministry said that all was well in the best of worlds…
    While the experts’ report states that the infrastructures (tanks and water circulation system) comply with minimum sanitary standards, the fact that Antibes Marineland and the French Minister for Ecology, Agnès Pannier-Runacher, are demanding, now that the park is closed, that the orcas be urgently transported – on the pretext of an advanced state of deterioration – raises questions. The absence of any explanation for this urgency, despite reports of “recurrent repair work”, suggests that the reality in the field is far more worrying than the experts suggest. Where is the reality? We’ll probably never know, given the experts’ unwillingness to take a stand and really objectify the situation.
  • Lack of transparency in the documentation
    The court’s ruling (Aix Court of Appeal, September 2023) provided for the submission of a summary document. However, this document was not produced, and the late or erratic transmission of Marineland’s documents bears witness to a lack of procedural rigor. This dysfunction contributes to the impression of an “expert report” which was mistaken for a simple report, without any critical investigation of the facts.

In conclusion:

An urgent call for the overhaul of management and practices

All the elements contained in the expert documents demonstrate that the management of orcas at Antibes Marineland is marked by an accumulation of diagnostic errors, inadequate medical follow-ups and infrastructure management out of step with the animals’ real needs. The report concludes that these dysfunctions – responsible for considerable suffering and even early deaths – illustrate a serious attack on animal welfare.

In light of these findings, One Voice is calling for an urgent overhaul of the orcas’ day-to-day management, including:

  • A complete review of medical follow-up protocols and veterinary practices;
  • Questioning captivity conditions and appropriate behavioral enrichment;
  • Total transparency in the communication of files and interventions carried out;
  • The association reiterates its proposal made to the Ministry and Marineland the day after Moana’s death in October 2023, and repeated on the day of Inouk’s death a few months later, to fully fund the mission of veterinarians and scientists specializing in orcas to come and take care of them and give Wikie and Keijo a chance of not suffering the same tragic fate as the other members of their family.

Loro Parque: would Morgan’s baby survive the arrival of the French orcas?

Loro Parque: would Morgan’s baby survive the arrival of the French orcas?

Loro Parque: would Morgan’s baby survive the arrival of the French orcas?
09.04.2025
Tenerife
Loro Parque: would Morgan’s baby survive the arrival of the French orcas?
Exploitation for shows

In early March 2025, Morgan gave birth again in the tanks of Loro Parque. Since then, she has been in isolation with her calf. We are publishing previously unseen images of the two orcas and warning of the danger posed to them by the imminent arrival of Wikie and Keijo in Tenerife. Only a few days old, the young orca may not survive this upheaval.

Here’s an exclusive video of Morgan and her calf, less than a week after his birth at Loro Parque in Tenerife, watched by male orcas Adán and Tekoa.

According to Dr. Gallego, a cetacean veterinarian and consultant to One Voice, there are two major risks to this seemingly puny newborn baby from the imminent arrival of Wikie and Keijo:

Firstly, the stress induced by the cranes, the waves this arrival will create, and the tensions between individuals in these tanks, which are so much smaller than those at Marineland. In which tank will Morgan and his son be in peace? Ideally, a minimum of one month is required before any upheaval takes place. 

And above all: what kind of water filtering system is planned? Morgan transmits her antibodies to the baby via her milk, but we don’t want the bacteria from the French orcas to expose him to diseases… 

Let’s not forget that Morgan’s daughter Ula died at less than three years of age… She was born with a malformation. To this day, we don’t know the real state of health of this little male orca, who doesn’t yet have a first name.

For Milo and Mina, the wolves of the Millevaches plateau, the mobilization continues!

For Milo and Mina, the wolves of the Millevaches plateau, the mobilization continues!

For Milo and Mina, the wolves of the Millevaches plateau, the mobilization continues!
03.04.2025
Corrèze
For Milo and Mina, the wolves of the Millevaches plateau, the mobilization continues!
Wildlife

Under pressure from farming unions blinded by hatred, the Corrèze prefecture refuses to protect the pair of wolves on the Millevaches plateau. They are unique in France due to their genetics, and want nothing more than to live. With our partner, we are redoubling our efforts to defend them!

A family like no other…

We’ve given them a name: Milo and Mina. In May 2023, a wolf had already been killed in Tarnac, but today they are the last representatives of their species in the Limousin. Together, they form a unique couple. Milo, a German-Polish male, crossed a large part of Europe to arrive on the Millevaches plateau. It was here that his path crossed that of Mina, a young female wolf barely two years old whose Italian-Alpine origins have just been confirmed. Fearful and inexperienced, she often travels with her companion. She is doing well and could soon give birth to cubs from an exceptional genetic cross… if only breeders would stop calling for her death.

… which the authorities want to slaughter

Since their discovery in the summer of 2024, the two wolves have been hunted relentlessly, to the point where Milo has been seriously injured. This relentless pursuit must stop! On Wednesday March 19, hand in hand with naturalists from the Carduelis association, we were in Tulle to make their voice heard by the prefect. True to form, the State turned a deaf ear to the arguments of scientists and animal protectors, preferring to side with those who want to see nothing in nature but animals soon to be sent to the slaughterhouse. Profit, a short-term vision, and nothing for biodiversity. Shooting permits remain in place, and the farming lobby is rubbing its hands. For them, it doesn’t matter that Milo and Mina are the only wolves in the whole of the Corrèze, Creuse and Haute-Vienne regions combined. It also doesn’t matter that they haven’t caused any “damage” to flocks since November 2024. The unions want only one thing: to exterminate them, whatever the cost.

Cohabitation, the only solution 

Yet there is another way, the only one that really works. In Italy, wolves, which are much more numerous than in France, are real mascots. In Abruzzo, farmers have adapted to their presence, and the wild animals now attract tourists and nature lovers alike, boosting the region’s economy. So why do we only think of slaughtering them on our side of the Alps?

For Milo and Mina, we are preparing new actions. Please join us and sign the petition that we are carrying in partnership with Carduelis!

Under pressure from frightened cheesemakers, yet more ibexes are slaughtered!

Under pressure from frightened cheesemakers, yet more ibexes are slaughtered!

Under pressure from frightened cheesemakers, yet more ibexes are slaughtered!
27.03.2025
Haute-Savoie
Under pressure from frightened cheesemakers, yet more ibexes are slaughtered!
Wildlife

In 2025, without a general mobilization, 20 potentially healthy Bargy ibexes will once again be slaughtered to appease the cheese lobby. This persecution must stop. Join us in opposing this new decree issued by the Haute-Savoie prefecture, which is open to consultation until April 4.

The ibexes of the Bargy massif continue to be shot on sight, whether healthy or not, even though their numbers are already very low. All this, to buy the peace of breeders who fear the transmission of brucellosis to the animals they exploit. After the inter-associative fight waged on behalf of these peerless climbers, the Haute-Savoie prefecture

has learned its lesson and no longer plans to slaughter them en masse. It’s about time! Having said that, it’s all very well to (finally!) play “top of the class”, but it’s clear that we shouldn’t be asking any more of the state services, who are nevertheless planning to kill twenty of them…

Another indiscriminate massacre…

The prefecture is submitting for public consultation a draft new decree authorizing the slaughter of 20 ‘unmarked’ ibexes, i.e. never tested and declared “healthy”.

Only sick animals are euthanized after capture. The others are released after testing and marking. But for those unfortunate enough to cross the steepest areas inaccessible to humans (so much the better for their peace and quiet!), shooting is once again planned. Unacceptable.

… orchestrated earlier and earlier in the name of economic interests

When will this relentlessness cease? They are already being poached by hunters and their species is, let’s not forget, protected. Why not let them live in peace? It’s all to protect the economic interests of the cheese industry!

Make farmers responsible, when this disease comes from the animals they exploit? Out of the question. As always, it’s easy to blame nature in general and wildlife in particular, rather than reconsidering one’s practices!

The icing on the cake is that these indiscriminate culls will take place between April 15 and June 15, right during the nesting season of bearded vultures, which are majestic birds of the mountains, who are struggling to survive… Not content with going after the ibexes, the government services will be greatly harming their peace and quiet at a crucial time: their reproduction.

To reject this decree, write to ddt-consultations-publiques@haute-savoie.gouv.fr before April 4, listing your arguments in your reply.

For animals unjustly classified as ESOD, the decisive hour at the Council of State approaches!

For animals unjustly classified as ESOD, the decisive hour at the Council of State approaches!

For animals unjustly classified as ESOD, the decisive hour at the Council of State approaches!
27.03.2025
France
For animals unjustly classified as ESOD, the decisive hour at the Council of State approaches!
Wildlife

In 2023, the French Ministry of Ecological Transition published a decree designating one of the lists of “species likely to cause damage” (ESOD). Valid for three years, this text condemns to death millions of animals unjustly considered undesirable by the State. To ensure that the voices of these victims of constant harassment are heard, One Voice has called for the decree to be annulled. Hearing on March 31 at 2:00 pm at the Council of State.

“ESOD”: for the State, kill them at all costs

Foxes, martens, weasels, stone martens, carrion crows, rooks, common magpies, starlings and Eurasian jays… Considered group 2 “ESOD”, these animals are the victims of constant harassment. And this despite the fact that they are already the target of often illegal administrative drives and hunting, including underground hunting for foxes and their young.

By classifying these species for three years, the ministerial decree of August 4, 2023 organizes their massacre. Traps are in overdrive -killing and maiming even domestic animals– and bullets are raining down, even outside the hunting season. Rather than learning to live with these sensitive, intelligent creatures, the State is once again adopting the logic of the hunters by choosing violence. 

Before the highest administrative court: obtain as many declassifications as possible

Because this arbitrary classification will lead to millions of deaths and is not based on any scientific logic, we took to court as soon as the decree was published, without obtaining its suspension. The judges considered that, these animals being classified as ESOD, an emergency intervention was not justified…

After months of proceedings and national mobilization, we will be present at the Council of State for the hearing on the merits on March 31 at 2:00 pm to defend these species, department by department. This is an essential step if we are to save lives and avoid their classification in the next triennial decree. 

In the meantime, sign our petitions for the removal of foxes from the ESOD list and for a radical reform of hunting!

In less than two months, 428 projects validated: 1,659,056 animals condemned, thousands trepaned

In less than two months, 428 projects validated: 1,659,056 animals condemned, thousands trepaned

In less than two months, 428 projects validated: 1,659,056 animals condemned, thousands trepaned
26.03.2025
France
In less than two months, 428 projects validated: 1,659,056 animals condemned, thousands trepaned
Animal testing

Since the beginning of the year, the French Ministry of Higher Education and Research (MESR) has not done things by halves. Between January 1 and February 21, 2025, no fewer than 428 projects were authorized and 1,659,056 animals condemned to undergo all sorts of painful experiments before losing their “usefulness” and being put to death.

Beyond the numbers lie the macabre fates of individuals…

Today, One Voice reveals in particular the fate reserved for primates in this series of protocols, and once again asks the authorities for the documents authorizing these tests.

 

Hundreds of open-brained monkeys

Whether studying Parkinson‘s disease or cerebrovascular accidents, the common thread is this: primates are mutilated, their skulls cut open to plug in invasive devices. 

In the chilling technical terms of a project summary, the monkeys undergo trepanning and “implantation of a head-restraining device and recording chamber via titanium screws surgically implanted on the head”. In short: a drill bit is inserted into their head, to the brain. Then a metal tube is attached to it, with a window sealed by a cap before “use”. During testing, the cap is removed and electrodes are inserted directly into the heart of the organ. 

Not to mention the pain, these experiments can cause infections (as we’ve seen at NeuroSpin), lead to fluid accumulation, damage the protective layer of the encephalon or, worst of all, deliberately cause irreparable damage!

For hours on end, according to a second protocol just as disconnected from the tortures endured, they are subjected to a series of interventions: “Animals that pass the training will then have a second cranial surgery under general anesthesia to implant the recording chambers or multielectrode arrays”. A grim reward indeed…

Of these 596 monkeys, 252 will be reused in other experiments or returned to breeding farms. As for those deemed too “damaged” by the procedures, they will simply be put to death. Their ordeal will end, once again, not out of compassion, but because they are no longer “usable”.

Hundreds of thousands of animals under the labs’ scalpel

Unfortunately, these 596 primates are only a tiny fraction of the victims… Alongside them, 1,624,660 domestic animals will also suffer the scalpel blows of their executioners:

We will continue to ask the Ministry for access to project application files in order to verify their conformity and the rigor of their evaluation. With the aim of increasing transparency, we will not stop denouncing these cruel tests and demanding a reduction in the number of animals used.

If, like three quarters of French people, you support the end of animal testing (One Voice/Ipsos April 2023), join us in calling for an end to these barbaric methods!

An end to the suffering of ducks in the Somme region: a man convicted of cruelty

An end to the suffering of ducks in the Somme region: a man convicted of cruelty

An end to the suffering of ducks in the Somme region: a man convicted of cruelty
25.03.2025
Somme
An end to the suffering of ducks in the Somme region: a man convicted of cruelty
Wildlife

After torturing ducks and geese for more than ten years, the farmer from Ponthoile has been convicted by the Criminal Court in Amiens. Against all this horror, the fact that we brought a civil action has borne fruit. Today is a victory for the thousands of migratory birds crammed together and mutilated throughout their lives, before being sold on to satisfy hunters in their huts.

Nightmare on the farm: a trafficking ring dismantled

An OFB investigation revealed that the torturer had been subjecting the birds to numerous abuses… since 2011! Imprisoned for life, the animals were kept on top of each other and were very often mutilated at the phalanges of their wings. This caused extreme pain for the 3,000 birds destined to serve as live decoys to attract their fellow birds during the hunt.

The farmer was operating illegally, without keeping any records. Greedy for profit, he disposed of the birds by selling them to clandestine networks. These ducks, in his eyes reduced to mere objects or waste, never knew the peaceful life they were entitled to.

An executioner convicted of sordid detention

The individual was found guilty of illegal activities, unauthorised sales and mistreatment of ducks and geese… Unfortunately, the court disregarded the water pollution caused, and the fact that the aquatic animals that had died were thrown away without any qualms or remorse. A fine of €10,000 and a five-year ban on practising his profession were imposed. What could be more normal given the atrocity of such acts? A sanction to deter against abuse on these farms, whatever form it takes, and the illegal trade in birds.

To denounce illegal farms and put an end to those controlled by hunters, sign our petition for a radical reform of hunting!

Return of traditional hunting: new hearing against the State’s obstinacy

Return of traditional hunting: new hearing against the State’s obstinacy

Return of traditional hunting: new hearing against the State’s obstinacy
24.03.2025
Return of traditional hunting: new hearing against the State’s obstinacy
Wildlife

Skylarks, golden plovers, lapwings… For years, they were subjected to the horror of traditional hunting. Thanks to our efforts, the courts have definitively buried these outdated practices. But for the past two years, the government has chosen to force them through by reauthorizing them via pseudo-“scientific experiments”. In 2023, we obtained an emergency suspension of captures in the Ardennes region. On March 26 at 10 a.m., the administrative court of Châlons-en-Champagne will examine our request against this decree.

Archaic, cruel, and illegal traditions

Coating a branch with glue and waiting for a thrush to stick to it and agonize for hours. Capturing a golden plover, a species classified as “near threatened” by the IUCN, making them cry out to attract other golden plovers and then pulling the nets shut violently on them. Collecting them and then killing them. This is the reality of the “traditional” practices that were authorized for decades in the name of a morbid pastime.

The battle was long, from the Council of State to the Court of Justice of the European Union, but after dozens of proceedings, conducted in parallel with the LPO, the courts ruled in our favor, canceling, since 2018,  the ministerial decrees setting quotas for birds that could be killed, then definitively banning glue traps in 2021, “tendelles” (stone traps) in 2023, and cages and nets in 2024.

The State remains stubborn in its opposition to birds and justice

As we know, the authorities, from the President of the Republic to the prefects, are prepared to do anything to satisfy the demands of this all too powerful minority. In 2023, they launched “experiments” in five departments, entrusted to hunters—those great scientists—to circumvent the court decisions confirmed year after year and reauthorize these cruel practices. The aim of this maneuver was to challenge the decisions already handed down by the judges in court once again.

Two years ago, we obtained an emergency halt to these pseudo-studies in the Ardennes, Gironde, and Lot-et-Garonne regions. However, in the Landes and Pyrénées-Atlantiques regions, the judge did not agree with us, and these captures for the purpose of killing were also authorized the following year.

On March 26 at 10 a.m., the administrative court of Châlons-en-Champagne will hold its hearing on the 2023 decree issued by the prefect of the Ardennes. Because traditions can never justify animal suffering and contempt for justice, we will continue to fight against these archaic practices, which are condemned by 83% of French people. Together, let us continue to demand a radical reform of hunting!

Poll: 9 out of 10 French people in favour of bears

Poll: 9 out of 10 French people in favour of bears

Poll: 9 out of 10 French people in favour of bears 20.03.2025
France
Poll: 9 out of 10 French people in favour of bears Wildlife

Bears are now hibernating peacefully after a turbulent summer marked by scare shots fired indiscriminately by the State. But this tranquillity is short-lived, as the threat of their downgrading looms ever larger, appealing to certain European politicians. Will these animals be the next victims of the lobbies? Nothing can satisfy the thirst for plundering nature and biodiversity of farmers and hunters who relentlessly harass wildlife. Some even cause the death of animals. Yet, like us, the majority of French people are in favour of their presence. This is shown by the Ipsos poll carried out for One Voice on French people’s opinions of brown bears.

Stories influence our perception of bears without always reflecting reality!

The French are fairly divided on the image that stories convey of brown bears. It is, however, considered more positive (39%) than negative (29%). Women have a less positive view of the image of bears as conveyed by stories (33% say it is generally positive) than men (44%).

If, for half of French people, these stories, tales and legends do not influence their perception of bears (51%), it is undoubtedly because they are aware that these fictional representations of bears do not correspond to reality (64%). However, the majority of people under 35 say that these works of fiction have had an impact on their view of bears (62%), and they are also much more likely to believe that these representations correspond to reality (47% vs. 29% of people aged 60 and over).

Low levels of concern among the population, who perceive brown bears as essential to biodiversity

A very small minority of respondents feel anxious about brown bears. Only 23% fear their presence, with just 6% saying they are very concerned.

It is therefore not surprising that the French respondents overwhelmingly agree that the presence of bears in France does not pose a danger to themselves and their families (86%), particularly those over 60 (92%), even though a quarter of those under 35 say the opposite. This can notably be explained by the fact that they are aware that brown bears tend to flee from humans (77%).

Brown bears are important animals in the eyes of nearly nine out of ten French people

The latter agree that they play a key role in ecosystems (83%), and that they have a rightful place in the French nature (87%).

Quite logically, 85% of French people also consider that the return of brown bears to France is a real benefit for biodiversity.

Better protection of livestock by farmers is expected to facilitate coexistence with brown bears!

The French thus seem to have a high regard for bears. In fact, the majority of them believe that bears are not aggressive animals (52%) and that if they attack livestock, it is because the livestock is not protected (56%).

Nearly nine out of ten respondents say that farmers should be required to put protective measures in place for their livestock (87%) to prevent attacks by brown bears. Furthermore, 85% believe that compensation for farmers from public funds should be conditional on them implementing protective measures (human presence, enclosures, dogs, etc.).

The French believe that the reintroduction of brown bears in the Pyrenees could disrupt ecosystems and want to spare them from certain hunting practices.

Regarding the relocation of brown bears from abroad to France in order to reintroduce the species to the Pyrenees, the majority of French people (63%) say that this practice can be risky and may disrupt the balance of ecosystems.

The vast majority of French people, who are committed to the preservation of brown bears, say they want to ban the lethal shooting of species with poor conservation status (83%), which includes brown bears. At the same time, the majority of them say they want to ban scare shots against bears (65%), a practice that frightens bears in their natural environment.

The survey was conducted by Ipsos between 30 October and 4 November 2024 among 1,000 people, who constituted a nationally representative sample of the French population aged 18 to 75. The sample was surveyed online via Ipsos’ Access Panel Online (quota method: gender, age, occupation of the respondent, type of urban area, region).

For peace for bears and to stop scare shots, sign our petition.

See the full survey See the full survey See the full survey See the full survey See the full survey See the full survey See the full survey See the full survey See the full survey See the full survey

On 26 March at 2 p.m., inauguration of a Chatipi to help stray cats in Saint-Geniès-de-Comolas

On 26 March at 2 p.m., inauguration of a Chatipi to help stray cats in Saint-Geniès-de-Comolas

On 26 March at 2 p.m., inauguration of a Chatipi to help stray cats in Saint-Geniès-de-Comolas
17.03.2025
Gard
On 26 March at 2 p.m., inauguration of a Chatipi to help stray cats in Saint-Geniès-de-Comolas
Domestic animals

One Voice, who has been fighting against cat strayings for years, is setting up triangular partnerships with municipalities or local communities and associations in view of identifying, neutering and caring for homeless cats, and releasing them while providing them with wooden shelters where they can drink, eat and take refuge. The town hall of Saint-Geniès-de-Comolas, in the Gard region, and the Chats des Rues association have long been committed to this cause. To further their commitment, they contacted One Voice to provide a sustainable shelter for cats without families and to raise public awareness of their plight. The inauguration will take place at the Chatipi space on Wednesday 26 March at 2pm.

The inauguration will take place in front of the Chatipi space located on Chemin de Montfaucon in Saint-Geniès-de-Comolas, at plot B 282. Mayor Olivier Jouve and part of his municipal council will be present. Representing the Chats des Rues association, President Marie-Louise Humblot will be accompanied by most of the board and volunteers. Finally, Mathilde Perrot and Aurore Defix will represent One Voice. Mehdi Mekerle, director of the Saint-Geniès-de-Comolas Leisure Centre, has also been invited and will be accompanied by several children from the centre.

Educational workshops to raise children’s awareness of the plight of stray cats

Chatipi is an ethical initiative aimed at creating spaces for stray cats in view of rescuing them while raising public awareness of their distress and needs. Around sixty such spaces are currently being developed throughout France.

Around twenty children, aged 6 to 10, who are enrolled in the town’s Leisure Centre, will attend the inauguration. Through educational workshops organised by One Voice they will learn about the needs of stray cats and the challenges they face on the streets. The aim is to explain why cats become strays and to remind people that, contrary to popular belief, our feline companions struggle to survive on their own in the wild, where they face hunger, cold, disease and human cruelty, and that action must be taken to help them.

Division of tasks and responsibilities

One Voice, who invented the Chatipi concept, provides the chalet and the cat flaps, covers the cost of 30 kilos of dry food and veterinary expenses (sterilisation, identification, tests) for 15 cats at the start of the operation, as well as the educational board.

For its part, the local council has provided the land and covered the cost of laying the concrete slab, assembling the chalet and installing an adjoining wire enclosure.

The association Chats des Rues which is highly involved in helping cats, with more than 500 sterilizations carried out since 2012, will be responsible for the long-term running of the Chatipi: fitting out the chalet, caring for and feeding the residents, monitoring their health, etc. In total, around fifteen unadoptable cats are expected to benefit from the Chatipi in Saint-Geniès-de-Comolas.