Rousset Primatology Station: entire lines of primates suffering in laboratories

Rousset Primatology Station: entire lines of primates suffering in laboratories

Rousset Primatology Station: entire lines of primates suffering in laboratories
04.11.2025
Rousset, Bouches-du-Rhône Rousset Primatology Station: entire lines of primates suffering in laboratories
Expérimentation animale

After taking legal action to obtain transparency around the fate of primates being used in France, One Voice finally received several — incomplete — documents from the CNRS and the University of Aix-Marseille.

Although they are only partial, these documents already paint a damning picture. They make it possible to reconstruct the journey of several marmosets born, transferred or held at the CNRS breeding facility in Rousset, and to glimpse the real conditions of the life’ of primates being used for experiments in France.

Entire families of primates victims of experiments over several generations

At the CNRS site in Rousset, suffering is not the lot of a single individual: it is passed on from generation to generation. Entire lines of primates are being exploited there.

  • For example, Fenouil, a marmoset who spent several years in Rousset, died in 2022 after undergoing numerous experiments. But he was also used for breeding. Eight babies were born to him, including Nuphar, Narcisse and Navet, who were born in 2017.
  • Nuphar died the same year as his father. A few days before their deaths, both had undergone injections into the brain as part of the same experimental project. His brothers, Narcisse and Navet, met a similar end: they were killed after being subjected to the same experimental protocol.
  • The case of Kaki, another marmoset, illustrates this infernal mechanism. He died in 2023 from an unknown cause, leaving behind descendants who also died in unclear circumstances: Orange, born in 2018, and Pépin, born in 2019 in Rousset, both died without any cause being given.
  • Salakis, born in 2021 in Rousset, was exploited for breeding. She gave birth to five babies—their fate remains unknown.
  • Her brother Sauvage, born the same year, suffered serious injuries to the throat and arms. Last May, one of his claws was torn off following ‘a mistake by the handler’, who allegedly pulled on him while he was clinging to the cage.

In the wild, marmosets are the little chatterboxes of the jungle

These South American primates live in groups and are very talkative. They even give each other names, using specific vocalisations. Cooperation is a ubiquitous practice in marmoset groups, particularly when it comes to raising the young, regardless of gender.

In laboratories, marmosets experience constant distress

And yet, the fate of many of these small mammals will be captivity, solitude and suffering. France remains the leading European country with respect to the use of animals, including primates, in its laboratories, in contradiction with European objectives to reduce their numbers. This is also a far cry from the ambitions of countries such as the United States, where the National Institute of Health (NIH) intends to reverse its practices within five years, making non-animal methods the norm, with those using living beings becoming the minority alternative.

With this expansion of the CNRS site in Rousset, our country and the research community are perpetuating cruel and obsolete practices, financed by millions of euros of public money. Join us in demanding that this type of project be abandoned!

To learn more about the suffering of these primates:

Traditional hunting: all the ‘experiments’ in 2023 were illegal

Traditional hunting: all the ‘experiments’ in 2023 were illegal

Traditional hunting: all the ‘experiments’ in 2023 were illegal
07.11.2025
France
Traditional hunting: all the ‘experiments’ in 2023 were illegal
Animaux sauvages

A few weeks ago, One Voice, together with LPO, obtained an emergency suspension of new authorisations to kill nearly 100,000 skylarks in the regions of Gironde, Landes, Lot-et-Garonne and Pyrénées-Atlantiques. These authorisations were based on the results of ‘scientific’ pseudo-experiments conducted… by the hunters themselves in 2023, which we had immediately challenged in court. Today, the Administrative Court in Bordeaux has ruled in our favour, following the courts in Châlons-en-Champagne and Pau, confirming the complete illegality of these desperate attempts to revive archaic practices in the name of ‘science’. But this victory heralds a new battle, as the Ministry now wishes to amend the European texts on the protection of birds. Join us in writing to the Ministry to say no to this unacceptable project!

For years, thousands of skylarks, lapwings and golden plovers were captured each autumn using devices each one more cruel than the other, before being collected and killed by hand by thrill-seeking hunters. We have fought tirelessly, from the administrative courts to the State Council and the Court of Justice of the European Union, and we have won every time.

Ardennes, Gironde, Landes, Lot-et-Garonne and Pyrénées-Atlantiques: these shameful experiments were illegal everywhere

Despite our victories, successive governments have shamelessly provided unwavering support to hunters to allow them to continue slaughtering these birds who have a poor conservation status. In 2023, they even attempted to reauthorise net capture in five regions under the guise of scientific pseudo-experiments entrusted to the hunters themselves. The aim? To once again circumvent court decisions.

The ruling handed down on 6 November by the Administrative Court in Bordeaux echoes those of judges in Pau and Châlons-en-Champagne: all these experiments were illegal. Hunters wanting to pass themselves off as impartial scientists? The court put them in their place, stating that ‘there is no evidence to suggest that such a programme would be entrusted to a research organisation’. They loudly proclaimed that we didn’t understand anything. Today, the courts have ruled: these captures should never have taken place.

Stop the persecution: hunters, ministers, respect the law and leave the birds in peace!

What will the State do now? Try once again to authorise illegal ‘experiments’? Introduce new ‘quotas’, like the ones for which we managed to obtain an emergency suspension before the State Council in September 2025? If they try, they will always find us standing in their way.

But a new option seems to be emerging: the minister has already indicated that he wants to go even further and is considering requesting an amendment to the European legislation on the protection of birds. This would be a historic step backwards and could pave the way for the return of glue hunting, which we thought had been buried for good, and it would be opposed by 83% of the French population.

The lives of birds are worth more than these tricks and this constant contempt for animals. Today, we are writing to the minister to express our opposition to any amendment to the European legislation, and we invite you to do the same. The hunters must finally accept that they have lost, and leave the birds in peace!

Creuse: after the culling of wolves, dogs are now being targeted

Creuse: after the culling of wolves, dogs are now being targeted

Creuse: after the culling of wolves, dogs are now being targeted
12.11.2025
Creuse
Creuse: after the culling of wolves, dogs are now being targeted
Animaux familiers

With wolves already being hunted, dogs are now becoming the new victims of administrative madness. The Prefecture of Creuse has just authorised the officially appointed huntmasters to kill dogs to “protect livestock”. This is an incredibly brutal decision, sadly reminiscent of the excesses already seen elsewhere in France. Under the guise of defending farmers, the State is institutionalising the killing of domestic animals —who are often lost, sometimes abandoned. We are challenging the order before the Administrative Court in Limoges. The hearing will take place on 19 November at 9.30am.

A familiar scenario: Aveyron, Haute-Vienne… and now Creuse

This is not the first time. Last year, the regions of Aveyron and Haute-Vienne attempted to impose the same deadly orders. In both cases, citizen mobilisation and legal action led to these decisions being suspended or repealed. These precedents should have served as a lesson. But clearly, some prefects want nothing but violence: let’s start again elsewhere, in silence.

Stray dogs, a poorly addressed problem

Stray dogs are not a subject to be dismissed out of hand. Abandoned or left to fend for themselves, they may, out of fear or hunger, approach livestock and cause incidents. But this is precisely where public action should set an example: identifying, collecting and protecting these animals rather than condemning them. Solutions exist – sterilisation and identification campaigns, care in shelters, support for owners – which would simultaneously protect livestock and respect animal life. Culling, on the other hand, is merely an admission of failure and laziness.

Bullets instead of solutions

When wolves are not being targeted, it is dogs. Each time, the same logic is at work: shoot first, think later. Instead of implementing effective and ethical protection measures for livestock, the easy and bloody option is chosen. And hypocrisy reigns: sheep are supposedly being saved, but only to be sent to the slaughterhouse a few months later.

This gun-toting policy is disgraceful. The slaughter of stray animals, whether dogs or wolves, solves nothing. It only serves to maintain a climate of fear and violence, where weapons replace reflection, and where animal life has no value.

We demand the immediate repeal of this order in the Creuse region and an end to these outdated practices. Dogs, like wolves, deserve protection and respect, not bullets from a State that has run out of arguments.

One Voice condemns the planned dolphinarium at Beauval Zoo: an unacceptable step backwards

One Voice condemns the planned dolphinarium at Beauval Zoo: an unacceptable step backwards

One Voice condemns the planned dolphinarium at Beauval Zoo: an unacceptable step backwards
05.11.2025
France
One Voice condemns the planned dolphinarium at Beauval Zoo: an unacceptable step backwards
Exploitation for shows

While France made a commitment in 2021 to gradually phase out the captivity of cetaceans, the project at Beauval Zoo aims to create a « study and research centre » for dolphins. This facade of fancy words conceals a new dolphinarium, synonymous with prolonged suffering for dolphins, with the added prospect of the animals being bred and eventually transferred to other dolphinariums, even as far away as China.

In sanctuaries, all breeding is prohibited

According to publicly available information, Beauval is planning to build pools containing more than 30,000 m³ of artificial seawater in order to accommodate a large number of bottlenose dolphins. While the figures may seem impressive, they are far from sufficient to meet the physiological and behavioural needs of dolphins who travel freely up to 90 km per day in the ocean. Dr Pierre Gallego, a veterinarian and marine biologist specialising in cetaceans, attests that this project « is nothing more than a dolphinarium in disguise », denouncing the exploitation of animal welfare to legitimise reproduction and captivity.

A move contrary to the spirit of the law and science

One Voice points out that the law passed in 2021 was supposed to mark the end of cetacean captivity in France. However, this project at Beauval pursues the logic of traditional dolphinariums, namely by planning for the birth of new individuals and exchanges between dolphinariums.

For Muriel Arnal, president of One Voice, « Beauval is trying to sell us the notion of a « land-based sanctuary »: pools of concrete disguised as a refuge. Tomorrow, will we have to accept permanent circuses, where tigers spend their lives in lorries? »

The association also denounces the pressure exerted by Marineland, which is threatening to transfer its dolphins to Spain. This strategy presents the French authorities with a false dilemma: choosing between captivity in Beauval and exile abroad, when a third option exists –that of genuine marine sanctuaries.

Marine sanctuaries, the only alternative for the welfare of dolphins

Since 2020, One Voice has been working with its partners on solutions involving sanctuaries that offer captive dolphins a semi-natural environment where they can relearn how to live without constraints and in complete safety. This model, which is supported by the European coalition Dolphinaria-Free Europe, is recognised as the only credible option for ensuring the welfare of dolphins without replicating the patterns of the captivity industry.

« Any relocation must be to a true sanctuary – one that prohibits breeding, public shows, close interactions, and trade in cetaceans. Anything less is just an upgraded dolphinarium » —Statement by the Dolphinaria-Free Europe coalition, of which One Voice is the French representative.

David Perpinan, a specialist veterinarian who has worked at the Loro Parque dolphinarium in Spain, states: « In Spain, three dolphinariums have recently closed, and this is the case throughout Europe. The Beauval Zoo, however, has decided to continue making dolphins suffer by breeding them and keeping them captive in concrete pools ».

A societal issue and a matter of political consistency

One Voice is calling on the Ministry for Ecological Transition to formally reject the Beauval Zoo project which contradicts the State’s commitment to protecting cetaceans. The association points out that it has already taken action and has succeeded in blocking the transfer of orcas from Marineland to Japan, and that it will continue to fight against any attempt to perpetuate captivity under misleading names.

« The public has not forgotten the fight for the cetaceans at Marineland. We will never be party to a new dolphinarium, even if it is « prettier ». » —Muriel Arnal, President of One Voice

One Voice demands:

that Beauval Zoo:

  • honour its initial commitment to take in dolphins without any breeding or transfer except to marine sanctuaries when these are ready.

And that the authorities:

  • refuse any authorisation to create a new dolphinarium, whatever its name;
  • actively support projects for marine sanctuary;
  • commit to a genuine rehabilitation policy for existing captive dolphins.

We are available for any further information or interviews.

Press Office

06 43 26 78 80

one-voice.fr

No to a new dolphinarium in Beauval No to a new dolphinarium in Beauval No to a new dolphinarium in Beauval No to a new dolphinarium in Beauval No to a new dolphinarium in Beauval No to a new dolphinarium in Beauval No to a new dolphinarium in Beauval No to a new dolphinarium in Beauval No to a new dolphinarium in Beauval No to a new dolphinarium in Beauval

Does, stags, roe deers: slaughtering them in the name of forests

Does, stags, roe deers: slaughtering them in the name of forests

Does, stags, roe deers: slaughtering them in the name of forests
05.11.2025
France
Does, stags, roe deers: slaughtering them in the name of forests
Wildlife

Increasing the culling of does, stags, and roe deers, authorizing their hunting in all seasons, reducing quotas and penalties for hunters… The strategy proposed by the administration to supposedly protect the forests managed by the National Forests Office (ONF) consists in sacrificing the lives of wild animals. One Voice denounces this false solution, which aims solely to satisfy the appetites of gun owners and the timber industry. It goes against all ethics and ecological logic.

Killing to preserve life: this is the insane proposal put forward in the new report published jointly by senior officials from the Ministry of Ecological Transition and Agriculture. As the primary targets of hunting with hounds, persecuted during prolonged hunting seasons and recurring victims of administrative hunts, deer, does, and roe deers are already hunted from all sides. Today, they are under serious threat of extermination: the government and the ONF are jointly calling for “a clampdown on wild ungulates”. This is a euphemism for authorizing increased culling and reducing penalties for hunters who do not comply with the quotas in force. The report goes even further and even proposes classifying deer and roe deers as “species likely to cause damage” (ESOD). If this were to happen, they could be hunted all year round and by any means, including guns and traps.

A new offensive against animals

Even though, in another report, the General Inspectorate for the Environment and Sustainable Development (IGEDD) expressly recommends removing group 2 from the ESOD and the Council of State has just overturned part of this classification, the administration is once again targeting what remains of the wildlife population.

Already pointed out by the European Union for its inaction in protecting the environment, the government must not once again give in to the hunting and financial interests of certain parties. Besides submission to hunters, the issue is not so much protecting nature as the lucrative “resource” of wood, threatened by droughts and fires.

Riddled with inconsistencies, the report mentions an increase in the number of cervids. Yet these animals are extremely useful for forest regeneration because they transport seeds. At the same time, wolves, which play a decisive role in natural regulation, are also increasingly persecuted, as their protection status has been downgraded.

So what do we want? Forests emptied of their animals? Faced with this senseless persecution, we stand alongside the animals, advocating an approach other than shooting them. Especially since peaceful alternatives exist: planting fruit trees, creating meadows, forest edges, or even closed canopy areas to encourage tree growth…

To stop this slaughter, One Voice is calling on the Ministry of Ecological Transition to demand the outright abandonment of this deadly project and the abolition of the unjust ESOD status!

Rousset primatology station: the same fate for all the primates exploited

Rousset primatology station: the same fate for all the primates exploited

Rousset primatology station: the same fate for all the primates exploited
04.11.2025
Rousset, Bouches-du-Rhône Rousset primatology station: the same fate for all the primates exploited
Animal testing

Whether they come from the same bloodlines or not, primates in laboratories share the same daily reality: suffering. The information, albeit partial, contained in the documents received from the CNRS and the University of Aix-Marseille concerning the protocols using these animals paints a chilling picture of the real “living” conditions of rhesus macaques. Many were born or passed through the Rousset site, which is looking to expand its operation.

Iroquoise, born in 2013 in Rousset, had numerous injuries caused by fights between individuals made aggressive by captivity and the intense stress of invasive tests. She gave birth to Indira in 2017. Both were used in the same project. Indira, like her mother, had visible signs of trauma on her face: wounds, scratches, injuries, and bites.

Behind these names are lives. Sentient beings, capable of fear, attachment, and pain. Because rhesus macaques are surprising creatures, among the few mammals that blush with pleasure, like many birds that use color to attract mates.

In a breeding facility like Rousset, their stories fade into obscurity behind administrative reports, but the torture inflicted upon them is repeated—generation after generation.

The common thread among all these primates: daily suffering

Whether they were born in Rousset, transferred from other centers, or exploited in different projects, they all share the same fate: confinement, deprivation, pain. Behind the protocols and scientific terms, their distress is the only constant.

Akira, who was born in 2009 in Rousset and died in 2018, underwent the insertion of cranial pins and chambers that became infected. Wounds are also reported, caused by fights with other primates due to their conditions of captivity. Researchers’ notes indicate:

Still showing signs of cortical collapse following cleaning of the chamber. Animal not well in cage: head back, drooling, vomiting, weak”.

In 2018, it was noted:

Animal not well in cage at 6 p.m. Bristled hair and vomiting observed during the day. […] then decision to operate on him the next day as an emergency to remove the chamber”.

The next day, Akira died on the operating table.

Eliott, born in 2009 in Rousset and deceased in 2019, was subjected to a research project on the effects of cocaine, forcing him to take repeated doses of the drug. The notes mention that he remained “in a dazed state (staring into space and listless posture) for several days”. He was attacked by other monkeys, requiring staples to be inserted. The records report numerous injuries due to fights. Electrical stimulators were implanted in his chest.

These excerpts reflect the physical and psychological violence inflicted on these animals, victims of prolonged and invasive protocols.

This is how, in 2025, primates are still being used and treated in our country’s laboratories.

Far from moving towards a reduction in animal experimentation, France is instead embarking on the path of industrializing primate breeding, in total contradiction with European objectives to transition to alternative methods.

The expansion of the CNRS site in Rousset, planned to turn it into a national breeding facility, is proof of this. Behind the technocratic term “National Center for Primatology” lies a brutal reality: the expansion of a site intended to produce and supply ever more monkeys for exploitation. Together, let’s make the voices of these animals heard: join us in calling for the cancellation of this project!

To learn more about the suffering endured by these primates:

The Vienne Prefecture condemns an unlimited number of badgers to endure 30 days of hunting

The Vienne Prefecture condemns an unlimited number of badgers to endure 30 days of hunting

The Vienne Prefecture condemns an unlimited number of badgers to endure 30 days of hunting
29.10.2025
Vienne
The Vienne Prefecture condemns an unlimited number of badgers to endure 30 days of hunting
Wildlife

On 14 October, the Prefecture of the Vienne region issued an order authorising the killing of badgers in Moulismes and the neighbouring municipalities of Plaisance, Adriers, Persac and Saulgé. The order was published too late to be suspended, with fanciful justifications –badgers suddenly becoming sheep killers– and without the slightest regard for either the animals or the law… Faced with this relentlessness and the illegality of the order, One Voice is taking legal action and requesting its annulment.

The order is tantamount to a declaration of war on badgers. While these animals can already be hunted throughout the current hunting season, as well as during additional unearthing periods, the Vienne Prefecture is adding to this by authorising a hunt of incomprehensible scale. For no less than 30 days, an unlimited number of individuals will be at risk of being killed within a radius of 233 kilometres. This vast playground will be open to anyone the officially appointed huntmaster deems useful to invite, without any supervision. The badgers will then be killed by any means the hunter deems appropriate… Perfect for thrill-seeking hunters, who will be able to indulge themselves to their heart’s content.

As the icing on the cake, this massacre was decided without prior consultation with the regional Director of Agriculture and Forestry. As for the citizens, they were not informed of the context or objectives of this operation, nor were they able to express their opinion on the matter, in total disregard of procedures.

Badgers… sheep killers?!

Why all the fuss? According to farmers, it’s because badgers attack… sheep. Who would believe such a tall tale? Certainly not the researchers who looked into this issue in 2024, pointing out that in no cases recorded in their study were any mustelids responsible for predation on sheep flocks. At best, they can feed on animals that are already dead, in which case it is not clear what harm this could do to farmers… Knowing that the damage caused by badgers to crops, however minimal, is very often exaggerated, these implausible statements are only half surprising…

Alternative measures exist

To justify this massacre, the authorities dare to claim that it is “necessary” because badgers supposedly cannot be trapped. When you know that hunters go after these animals deep in their burrows during every underground hunt, this sounds more than far-fetched. Once again, the State, hand in hand with trigger-happy individuals, demonstrates its obsession with bloodshed, without mentioning any alternative measures to these atrocities. Meanwhile, to protect crops in the long run, only the use of olfactory repellents, non-return flaps and low fences would be effective.

To protect badgers and prevent the authorities from finding new and increasingly far-fetched excuses, sign our petition for a radical reform of hunting.

In the space of three months, the French government has authorised experimentation on more than 1.8 million animals in French laboratories

In the space of three months, the French government has authorised experimentation on more than 1.8 million animals in French laboratories

In the space of three months, the French government has authorised experimentation on more than 1.8 million animals in French laboratories
28.10.2025
France
In the space of three months, the French government has authorised experimentation on more than 1.8 million animals in French laboratories
Animal testing

In France, authorisations for protocols involving animals continue, month after month, without any questioning. Fundamental and applied research, regulatory and toxicological testing: all continue to cause the suffering and death of hundreds of thousands of sentient beings. Between 22 July and 22 October 2025, 1,867,167 animals were used in experimental projects authorised by the Ministry of Research. Here are a few examples presented by One Voice!

Behind these figures, a wide variety of projects continue to be carried out throughout the country, illustrating the extent to which France is not making any real transition towards animal-free science, despite the knowledge and tools that would make it possible to reduce the use of animals.

Primates: lives destroyed in the name of science

In France, 3,378 primates — mainly macaques and marmosets — continue to be used in experiments of unacceptable cruelty. These social, intelligent animals are torn from their fellow creatures and condemned to months of suffering in laboratory cages. Here is a non-exhaustive list of the abuses they suffer:

  • As part of toxicology studies, 2,500 macaques will receive test substances daily, either orally or by injection. They will undergo blood and tissue sampling, and sometimes surgical implants. Some will be isolated for up to three months, restrained in a chair during procedures. The expected effects include pain, stress, weight loss and physiological changes. The vast majority of them will be killed, and a few will be reused in other experiments.
  • In another protocol, 32 macaques will undergo injections directly into the eyes, repeated examinations under anaesthesia, and painful specimen samplings. Fasting and stressed by restraint, they will experience acute pain before also being killed for analysis of their eyes. Again, 28 of them will not survive. The remaining four will be used in another project.
  • In order to study yellow fever virus, 66 macaques will be deliberately infected by mosquitoes carrying the virus. They will endure fever, vomiting, loss of appetite and extreme fatigue before dying from the infection or being killed for “study”.
  • Finally, 320 marmosets and 225 macaques will undergo surgical implants with devices to administer test molecules and monitor their physiological parameters. The consequences: pain, inflammation, isolation and intense stress. 

While these experiments are on the increase, the State plans to expand the Rousset Primatology Station in the Bouches-du-Rhône region to turn it into a “National Primatology Centre“. This public project, estimated to cost €30 million and financed by our taxes, will prolong the captivity and suffering of thousands of animals.

We strongly condemn this project. Rather than investing in suffering, France ought to invest in the science of the future: animal-free, ethical and truly innovative.

Dogs and cats: our companions are being exploited in laboratories in France

In France, thousands of dogs and cats continue, year after year, to be subjected to long, painful and often fatal experiments. Behind each protocol lies an unbearable reality: affectionate animals are being turned into research tools. Here are a few examples:

  • To test medical devices, 240 dogs will undergo one or more surgeries lasting up to three hours. Implantations, reopenings, repeated blood samples: despite anaesthesia, post-operative pain, infections and locomotor discomfort are common. All will be euthanized at the end of the studies.
  • In another project, 90 dogs will receive experimental molecules by injection, sometimes directly into the brain or joints. These procedures cause stress and pain, and nerve damage may occur. Again, the majority will not survive.
  • 260 cats will be used in infection studies involving the administration of viruses or bacteria. Injected, swabbed daily, and subjected to repeated sample-taking, they will develop fever, cough, mouth ulcers, conjunctivitis, diarrhoea, or vomiting. 220 will be killed, and the rest will be used in another project.
  • 80 dogs will be vaccinated and then exposed to pathogens administered oro-nasally. Frequent blood samples, daily rectal swabs, repeated restraint and stress are part of the protocol. Unvaccinated animals, used as controls, will develop diarrhoea, vomiting and fever before being euthanized.
  • Finally, 50 dogs will undergo major surgery to implant vascular devices. Despite anaesthesia, post-operative pain, fatigue and loss of appetite are inevitable. All will be killed at the end of the experiments.

These are the atrocities that continue to occur every day in French laboratories.

Rodents: still as many are subjected to painful and deadly projects

With more than 1.4 million individuals exploited, rodents remain the most commonly used animals in French laboratories. Mice, rats, rabbits and hamsters account for the majority of protocols, often among the most invasive.

Here are a few examples:

  • In a project on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, 6,170 mice will be subjected to repeated injections, some directly into the central nervous system, to study the progression of the disease. They will develop progressive paralysis before being euthanized.
  • To study optic nerve damage, 3,075 mice will receive up to three injections in the eye, followed by a section of the nerve, causing inflammation, pain and loss of vision.
  • In a neurobiology project, 180 mice will undergo surgery, lens implants and behavioural tests. Deprived of food and isolated, they will receive electric shocks before being killed.
  • To study bone marrow transplants, 8,564 mice will be irradiated, grafted and regularly sampled, causing stress, weight loss and repeated pain over several weeks, even though these procedures are classified as “moderate”.
  • 7,624 mice will be victims of a project on Alzheimer’s disease, enduring force-feeding, anaesthesia and terminal surgery. Pregnant females will undergo premature births and develop motor and cognitive disorders before being killed.
  • 45,000 mice will undergo blood sampling, anaesthesia, surgery and repeated injections, including subcutaneous implants and administrations. They will suffer pain, bruising, hypothermia, stress, weight loss and motor disorders, before most of them are killed.
  • 4,692 mice will receive neurotoxins by injection or orally in a botulism protocol, leading to progressive paralysis, hypothermia and isolation, eventually resulting in certain death.
  • 9,934 mice will be manipulated over several weeks to test treatments against tumour and metastatic cells after receiving tumour cell injections. They will suffer stress, pain, irradiation and restricted mobility, with some developing conditions leading to loss of appetite and weight. All of the mice will be killed.
  • Finally, 7,680 mice will be subjected to severe peritonitis, artificially induced by surgery or injection of intestinal contents. They will experience a drop in body temperature, weight loss and depression before being sacrificed for observation.

Ethical and modern science is possible

The transition to animal-free science is no longer an utopian dream: it is overwhelmingly supported by the French population (Ipsos/One Voice survey, April 2023), by nearly 150 European scientists from 19 Member States, by the European Parliament in 2010 and 2023, and by French parliamentarians.

We therefore demand that laboratories fully comply with the law, giving priority to alternative methods whenever available.

We encourage professionals to train in animal-free research techniques and urge our political representatives to back significantly increased funding for these approaches.

Because 21st-century science can no longer rely on practices from a bygone era.

Together, let us call on the Minister for Higher Education and Research to commit to ethical and modern research.

Download our template letter and join us in the fight for science that is finally free from animal testing.

From the Alps to the Pyrenees: a string of victories for mountain galliformes

From the Alps to the Pyrenees: a string of victories for mountain galliformes

From the Alps to the Pyrenees: a string of victories for mountain galliformes
24.10.2025
France
From the Alps to the Pyrenees: a string of victories for mountain galliformes
Wildlife

Since 2021, One Voice has been fighting to save mountain galliformes whenever prefects deliver them up to hunters, thereby saving thousands of individuals. Once again this year we have taken legal action in several French regions to have the shooting of these endangered mountain birds suspended. Already the courts have ruled in our favour: in the regions of Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, Hautes-Alpes and Isère, the lives of hundreds of birds will be spared, while several orders for 2022, 2023 and 2024 have been definitively cancelled in Ariège and Pyrénées-Orientales.

Every year, mountain galliformes, already victims of the decline of traditional pastoral practices, as well as of tourism and winter sports, are harassed by hunters with the blessing of the prefectures, when all they want is to live in peace. We are taking legal action to defend these birds, which are classified as near threatened by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

Hundreds of birds spared in Alpes-de-Haute-Provence and Hautes-Alpes

Following our requests for summary judgment, the judge in Marseille suspended the orders issued by the prefects of the regions of Alpes-de-Haute-Provence and Hautes-Alpes. The 122 black grouse and 197 rock partridges and red-legged partridges targeted in these regions will be spared. The Court went so far as to remind the trigger-happy hunters that nothing prevents them from participating in the counting of these mountain animals without demanding the right to slaughter them in return… This is a clear message and an essential recognition of the need to immediately ban the killing of these individuals.

Mixed decisions from the Court in Grenoble

In the Isère region, we have obtained an immediate halt to the slaughter of 84 rock partridges authorised by the Prefect. However, despite our efforts, the judge has rejected our requests against the authorisations granted by the regional hunting federations in Savoie and Haute-Savoie targeting this species and black grouse. This despite the completely unfair tactics of the hunters who waited until the day of the hearing to finally publish these quotas which they had deliberately concealed to prevent us from finding out about them.

This incomprehensible decision challenges a ruling by the Administrative Court of Appeal, which is rare and worrying in so far as it marks a break with a history of court decisions favourable to mountain galliformes.

The illegality of shooting grey partridges in Ariège and the Pyrénées-Orientales confirmed for 2022, 2023 and 2024

With the emergency over, the courts in the Pyrenees have confirmed the illegality of shooting mountain grey partridges in 2022, 2023 and 2024. Whether in the regions of Pyrénées-Orientales or Ariège, the administrative courts of Montpellier and Toulouse have reiterated that it is not acceptable to kill animals for pleasure when their populations are collapsing. They also penalized the authorities for failing to comply with the minimal procedural standards required of them by choosing not to disclose any relevant information about the consequences of their order prior to its publication. This decision will strengthen our fight for next year, if the State once again chooses to brush aside these rulings and continue its relentless persecution of these birds.

After record-breaking seasons in 2023 and 2024, which saved thousands of lives, the results obtained in 2025 confirm the need to protect these animals, victims of the deadly hobby of a small minority. More than ever, we need you to speak up for these birds of the peaks!

Animal experimentation: the CNRS and Aix-Marseille University persist in their lack of transparency

Animal experimentation: the CNRS and Aix-Marseille University persist in their lack of transparency

Animal experimentation: the CNRS and Aix-Marseille University persist in their lack of transparency
22.10.2025
Marseille, Bouches-du-Rhône
Animal experimentation: the CNRS and Aix-Marseille University persist in their lack of transparency
Animal testing

For years, One Voice has been fighting to lift the veil on the fate of primates used for research purposes in France. But behind the walls of the laboratories, silence and opacity remain the rule. Faced with this refusal to be transparent, we have taken legal action.

 

On June 12, the Marseille Administrative Court ruled in our favor, ordering the CNRS and Aix-Marseille University (AMU) to provide us with documents relating to the primates held in their facilities. Some of these primates come from the Rousset breeding facility.

However, despite this court ruling, the CNRS and AMU continue to withhold certain documents, in particular inspection reports (carried out by State agencies to monitor the conditions in which animals are kept and experimented on), and to systematically conceal other essential information, such as the causes of death of the monkeys.

This concealment prevents the complete traceability of the animals used and directly contravenes the transparency obligations to which these institutions are subject.

Our fight continues and we will not give up! We have once again taken the matter to the administrative court to ensure that this concealment is lifted and that the court ruling is fully enforced.

The hearing is scheduled for November 3.