Transfer of the dolphins from Marineland: Press release

Transfer of the dolphins from Marineland: Press release

Transfer of the dolphins from Marineland: Press release
22.07.2026
Antibes
Transfer of the dolphins from Marineland: Press release
Exploitation for shows

Following the failure of various legal actions brought in recent days by 15 organisations, the way was completely clear for Parques Reunidos on Wednesday 22 July. The previous afternoon, transport crates were brought out, and stretchers began to be delivered to the Marineland grounds, followed by the semi-trailers signalling an imminent departure.

Loading is now underway for eight of the twelve dolphins at Marineland in Antibes. We are sharing these images with you as a sneak preview.

Their final destination: the dolphinarium in Málaga. A national scandal, a disgrace orchestrated by money, and a high-risk journey for animals whose safety cannot be guaranteed.

Once on board, long hours await them, immobilised out of the water, terrified, with the pressure of gravity bearing down on their organs, in night-time temperatures that do not drop below 24 degrees.

Lua, torn away from her mother, her grandmother and her best friend – separated from everything that made her captivity bearable – will find herself in Málaga with the male dolphins, driven mad by captivity. And where are they headed? A Spanish dolphinarium, then another at Beauval Zoo, for which the Minister for the Environment has just issued a decree explicitly authorising breeding. The French public is thus forced to watch helplessly as this tragedy unfolds – a tragedy that the government has fully supported through its failure to find a dignified solution in the form of sanctuaries, and its pro-financial-interests stance towards Marineland and Beauval Zoo. And this is despite the repeated lies from Parques Reunidos, which as recently as Monday claimed it had not set a date for the cetaceans’ departure.

The teams from One Voice, who have been on site for days, will be keeping watch throughout the night; our campaigners are gathering for a dignified protest, in stark contrast to this industry of carnage.

More information to follow tomorrow.

Transfer of the dolphins from Marineland: Press Release

The transfer of the dolphins from Marineland to Spain has begun

 

Pomme has been killed: Press release

Pomme has been killed: Press release

Pomme has been killed: Press release
20.07.2026
Alpes
Pomme has been killed: Press release
Wildlife

Last May, One Voice campaigned to save a female wolf trapped in the Seine-Maritime – one of the few wolves in Normandy – and succeeded in having her released into the wild in the Alps, despite demands from extremist farmers’ unions that she be put down. Pomme, the young female wolf, had adapted perfectly to her new home. One Voice has just learnt that she was shot dead during the night of 16–17 July in the Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, on orders following the deaths of animals from a herd for which, as her GPS collar data shows, she was not responsible. A scandal — and an illustration of what wolves are enduring throughout France.

We had named her Pomme, so that her origins – Normandy, that land where hunters and farmers wanted her dead – would never be forgotten. Rescued from a trap in the spring, transferred and then released in the Alps, she had immediately found her feet. For two months, her tracking collar told the story of a free, intelligent animal that posed no threat to livestock.

In the span of two months, Pomme travelled more than 500 kilometres and explored four French departments — Drôme, Isère, Hautes-Alpes and Alpes-de-Haute-Provence — before beginning to settle down south of Lake Serre-Ponçon. Throughout this time, no negative interactions with domestic herds were recorded: precise data from her GPS collar confirms that she had not been involved in any damage to livestock since her release. She fed exclusively on wild animals — young deer, roe deer, young wild boar and foxes — the very same animals that are hunted down and killed by any means available on the pretext that their numbers need to be ‘controlled’. She had also been observed on several occasions with at least one other wolf.

Genetic analyses further highlight her significance: Pomme was the result of a cross between the Italo-Alpine and German-Polish wolf populations. She was by no means a hybrid with the domestic dog, but rather a wild wolf, Canis lupus lupus. A rare genetic heritage, essential to biodiversity — that someone chose to destroy.

An ‘innocent’ animal, shot all the same

We know from a reliable source that the shooting was carried out in the Alpes-de-Haute-Provence by a wolf hunter commissioned following the death of a farm animal. However, the data from her GPS collar shows that, in all likelihood, Pomme was not responsible for this damage. Furthermore, the DDT 04 had been informed the day before, that the female wolf had been photographed by hunters in the area.

We demand the truth. How many other wolves are wrongly accused, then killed in silence? Pomme’s story raises questions about all the others. Enough lies, enough propaganda; we want the facts, the documents, the evidence. One Voice will be lodging a request regarding these extremely serious incidents.

« They killed Pomme even though she had done nothing wrong, even though she was adapting perfectly, even though her data proved her innocence. This is an extremely serious matter. Pomme is not an isolated case: she is the face of all those wolves branded as guilty to justify killing them. We will not remain silent,” says Muriel Arnal, President of One Voice.

Scapegoats, even at the highest levels of government

Pomme’s fate speaks volumes about an era in which wolves have (once again) become the convenient scapegoats of a policy that has lost its way. Only around 1,082 wolves live on French territory, a far cry from the viability threshold estimated by scientists to be between at least 2,500 and 5,000. Yet up to 23 per cent of them may now be killed each year.

While the Ministries of Agriculture and Ecology bow to pressure from lobbies, that the obligation to protect livestock is being weakened, and that the way is being cleared for shooting, the reality on the ground is being trampled underfoot. Wolves play a fundamental role in the balance of natural habitats, which so badly need them. Wild animals no longer have anywhere to survive in peace.

Taking action for Pomme, and a series of upcoming campaigns

One Voice would like to thank all those who, outraged by what is happening, have brought the truth about Pomme to light. We call on them, and all witnesses, to share information about wolves killed in France with us. Their anonymity is guaranteed completely and absolutely. It is thanks to them that this hypocrisy will be exposed.

One Voice will organise an action in support of Pomme at the very spot where she was killed, in the Alpes-de-Haute-Provence. This will be just the first in a series of actions to denounce far and wide what happened to her, and to relentlessly ask the question: what, in reality, is the situation for all the other wolves? The organisation is also looking into the possibility of lodging a request and will shortly announce the date and venue of the gathering.

Pomme was rare, precious, free. She had done nothing wrong, yet she was killed. We will not forget her — and we will not allow impunity to take hold.

Pomme has been killed: Press Release

They’ve killed Pomme! The female wolf from Normandy, released into the Alps, has been shot.

One Voice gives the primates of Rousset a voice in the European Parliament

One Voice gives the primates of Rousset a voice in the European Parliament

One Voice fait entendre la voix des primates de Rousset au Parlement européen
17.07.2026
Strasbourg, France
One Voice gives the primates of Rousset a voice in the European Parliament
Animal testing

Europe is drawing up a roadmap to phase out animal testing. At the same time, France plans to triple the number of cages at the Rousset primatology centre in the Bouches-du-Rhône. This absurdity was at the heart of our statement on 9 July before the ‘Animal Welfare and Protection’ group of the European Parliament.

Instead of clinging to an outdated and cruel model, shouldn’t France – the EU member state that carries out the most animal testing – also be the first country in Europe to fund animal-free alternatives?

This crucial question was at the heart of the debates in the European Parliament on 9 July. Our aim: to alert MEPs to the dangers of the proposed expansion of the Rousset primate breeding facility, at a time when the European Commission has just published its roadmap to end animal testing on 1 June.

Investing today in laboratory primate breeding amounts to perpetuating an outdated model

Every new facility makes it even more difficult to phase out these practices, due to the equipment funded and the jobs created that depend on them. This is all the more true given that this expansion project involves a colossal investment of 30 million euros of public money from the ‘France 2030’ plan, which is in fact intended to support innovation and the ecological transition. This decision is in complete contradiction not only with the initial ambitions, but also with the expectations of the public and those of a growing section of the scientific community itself.

Continued capture and importation

Even if expanded, the Rousset breeding facility would only account for around 35 per cent of French experiments. Hundreds of primates will still be imported from Mauritius and Asia. Our undercover investigations carried out in 2023 with our local partners have shown that captures in the wild continue to fuel the industry. Torn from their families and their forests, transported thousands of kilometres, these sentient beings – with exceptional social, emotional and cognitive abilities – are paying a heavy price. Beyond the suffering endured by the individual animals, these imports increase the risk of zoonoses – diseases transmissible from animals to humans, such as tuberculosis. 

1.2 million European citizens have spoken up

A lack of transparency, a waste of public money, health risks, the continuation of cruel and obsolete experiments… By pressing ahead with this project, France is sending a disastrous signal to the international community, one that threatens the European roadmap adopted – need we remind you – in response to the massive mobilisation of 1.2 million citizens through the European Citizens’ Initiative ‘Save cruelty – Free Cosmetics – Commits to a Europe without animal testing’, launched in 2021 across 22 countries. In France, the population has also spoken out, with 93 per cent opposing the Rousset project.

Every euro invested in new cages is one euro less for the medical alternatives of tomorrow. Primates do not belong in laboratories or in the cages in Rousset. By making their voices heard in the European Parliament, One Voice is exposing the infamous Rousset project to the whole of Europe.

Watch our filmed statement on the intergroup’s website.

One Voice gives the primates of Rousset a voice in the European Parliament

9 July 2026 – One Voice denounces the proposed expansion of the Rousset primate breeding facility in the European Parliament

 

Court hearing on the foxes: Press release

Court hearing on the foxes: Press release

Court hearing on the foxes: Press release
17.07.2026
Hauts de Seine
Court hearing on the foxes: Press release
Wildlife

On Thursday 23 July 2026 at 10am, the Administrative Court of Cergy-Pontoise will hear the application for summary proceedings brought by One Voice against the order issued by the Prefect of Hauts-de-Seine on 15 June 2026. This order authorises, for two and a half months, hunts at the authorities’ initiative in a private garden, using traps or night-time shooting. This is an exceptional measure misused for purposes other than its intended aim, with no legal or scientific basis, which the organisation is calling for to be suspended as a matter of urgency.

One needs to understand what lies behind the administrative terminology. From 15 June to 31 August, in the dead of night, foxes may be hunted down, trapped or shot in a private garden in the Hauts-de-Seine. Night-time shooting and traps, whose unspeakable cruelty is well-known: they strike indiscriminately, without distinguishing their victims. These are the methods being deployed – hard to believe, almost impossible to imagine. And for what danger? Droppings and burrows in a garden.

A woman complained about the presence of foxes and therefore requested that traps be set up in her garden to wipe out this fox family. The prefecture authorised their killing, upon simple request, without considering any alternative measures or making the slightest effort to raise awareness. The easy way out: killing, rather than learning to coexist.

Nature’s treasures, treated as pests

Who are these so-called ‘pests’? Highly intelligent creatures with exceptional abilities to adapt, remember and learn, endowed with a particularly sophisticated social organisation and means of communication. Playful and sociable, foxes are also excellent parents. All they ask is to live in peace, to look after and feed their family – in the height of summer, when the year’s litter of cubs are still dependent on their parents. As emblems of our forests and countryside, they are now also settling on the outskirts of our towns and cities. Coming across a fox in your garden is not a nuisance, it is a stroke of luck.

A fox shuns humans and is completely harmless. In its 2023 report, the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES) concluded that no culling of foxes could be justified on health grounds. Worse still: culling them has the opposite effect, by encouraging the proliferation of rodents that carry Lyme disease. Foxes are not a threat; they are our allies.

A nationwide campaign against foxes

This order is part of a wider campaign of persecution: every year in France, at least 500,000 foxes are killed by shooting, trapping or digging-out, largely because they are classified as a ‘species likely to cause damage’ (ESOD) in 88 departments, a classification with no scientific basis. And the noose is tightening: the draft three-year decree for 2026–2029, currently open for public consultation until 30 July 2026, plans to extend this classification to 91 departments — three more than at present!

“Trapping and shooting foxes at night, in a garden, simply because they dig burrows: this is where the logic of treating these animals as pests leads. We ask the judge to reiterate that wildlife is not a nuisance but an asset.” — Muriel Arnal, President of One Voice.

If a burrow in a garden is enough to condemn foxes to death, then no wild animal is safe anywhere. One Voice will not allow this precedent to be set and will be in court on 23 July to block it.

Court hearing on the foxes: Press release

One Voice goes to court to suspend the prefectural order authorising the killing of foxes on a private property in the Hauts-de-Seine

 

14 contested badger orders: Press release

14 contested badger orders: Press release

14 contested badger orders: Press release
15.07.2026
Rennes
14 contested badger orders: Press release
Wildlife

One Voice, together with ASPAS and AVES France, is calling on the Administrative Court of Rennes to immediately suspend 14 prefectural orders — one per constituency — authorising officially appointed huntmasters to organise massive and virtually unlimited hunts at the authorities’ initiative against badgers throughout the department of Finistère until 31 December 2026. The hearing will take place on Tuesday 21 July 2026 at 2.30 pm.

These orders amount to a veritable free pass granted to officially appointed huntmasters: an unlimited number of hunts at the authorities’ initiative throughout the department, with no restrictions on the number of badgers killed, and the possibility of enlisting up to thirty hunters.

The authorised methods are extremely broad: shooting, including at night, trapping, but also ‘manual’ and ‘mechanical’ digging-out. The former is none other than underground hunting—which the Administrative Court of Rennes had already, at our request, suspended in the Finistère for the additional period in 2026, by an order dated 10 June. Is the Prefecture attempting to circumvent this court ruling by including underground hunting amongst the authorised hunting methods?

For hours on end, badgers are cornered at the bottom of their burrows and bitten by dogs – which also suffer injuries during the operation – before being dragged out using tongs that maim them, and then killed. As for ‘mechanical’ digging, using a digger or backhoe loader, this amounts to crushing the burrows and burying entire families alive, doomed to die of suffocation.

At this time of year, the young are still present in the burrows. Terrified by the dogs, gunfire and machinery, young badgers still dependent on their mothers risk being injured, crushed, buried alive or killed outright. And while the summer’s heatwaves and droughts are already taking their toll on wildlife, making access to water and food more difficult, the State has chosen to compound this with the violence of these hunts — without any real justification based on alleged damage; it is, yet again, the same old cronyism….

These orders are moreover published without any prior public consultation and in complete contravention of the law, and are based on arbitrariness, not science. The three organisations are calling on the Administrative Court of Rennes to suspend them and to protect badgers, these architects of nature and pillars of biodiversity.

14 contested badger orders: Press release

In the Finistère, One Voice is challenging 14 orders that subject badgers to unrestricted hunting

 

Victory for the badgers in Ille-et-Vilaine: Press release

Victory for the badgers in Ille-et-Vilaine: Press release

Victory for the badgers in Ille-et-Vilaine: Press release
10.07.2026
Ile et Vilaine
Victory for the badgers in Ille-et-Vilaine: Press release
Wildlife

In a ruling dated 9 July 2026, the judge presiding over summary proceedings at the Administrative Court of Rennes granted an emergency suspension of the additional underground hunting season, which had authorised the hunting of badgers in the Ille-et-Vilaine from 1 June until the general opening of the hunting season on 14 September. This decision was secured by One Voice, AVES France, ASPAS and LPO Bretagne, represented by the law firm Géo-Avocats.

Following a request by the four organisations, the judge hearing the summary proceedings suspended the prefectural order which extended the badger hunting season into the height of summer, precisely when this year’s young are at their most vulnerable. As it had done on 10 June for the Finistère, the Administrative Court of Rennes confirmed its position on a key point of law: the definition of ‘young’ mammals, whom it is prohibited to kill.

Adopting the definition provided by the Administrative Court of Appeal in Bordeaux, the judge ruled that the term ‘young of all mammals’ should be understood to mean a young animal that has not yet reached independence, that is to say, one that is incapable of surviving on its own without relying on its mother. This state cannot be equated solely with the weaning period, as hunters regularly claim.

The judge thus points out that this non-selective practice can lead to the illegal killing of young badgers still dependent on adults, purely for the hunters’ pleasure.

For behind the terms ‘underground hunt’ or ‘digging-out’ lies an unbearable reality: badgers hunted right down into their burrows, cornered for hours, bitten by dogs, torn from their refuge… and then killed. A despicable, violent practice belonging to a bygone era.

Following cases in the Finistère, Haute-Marne and Cher, this latest suspension reinforces a clear body of case law in favour of badgers. One Voice and its partners will continue to fight to put an end to ‘digging-out’ wherever it is still permitted.

Victory for the badgers in Ille-et-Vilaine: Press Release

Victory for the badgers in Ille-et-Vilaine: the courts have granted an emergency suspension of the additional period of digging-out

 

27,430 animals condemned: One Voice cracks down on the lack of transparency of the laboratories

27,430 animals condemned: One Voice cracks down on the lack of transparency of the laboratories

27,430 animals condemned: One Voice cracks down on the lack of transparency of the laboratories
09.07.2026
France
27,430 animals condemned: One Voice cracks down on the lack of transparency of the laboratories
Animal testing

For years, a simple, terse statement issued by the ethics committees was enough to inflict unspeakable suffering on lab animals. The Administrative Court of Appeal in Paris has just issued these ethics committees with a stern admonishment. Thanks to our campaign, they will no longer be able to rely on a few vague phrases to authorise the unacceptable. A historic victory for transparency and for animals.

In 2022, our team uncovered a staggering experimental project. To test future treatments for epilepsy, it announced the use of 27,430 rodents: 8,700 mice, 17,730 rats and 1,000 Mongolian gerbils. All of these are sentient, social animals, capable of experiencing complex emotions such as fear, stress or pleasure. Animals whose welfare is governed by European regulations and the 3Rs principle, yet 26,040 of them were destined to undergo procedures classified as ‘severe’. Put simply: weeks of carefully planned pain and distress, with no outcome other than death.

Various methods, all based on suffering

The protocol divided the animals into ten groups. The methods used to induce convulsions varied. Some were administered substances followed by electric shocks to the cornea, in the ears or directly to the brain. Others endured injections of substances, while still others underwent surgery to have electrodes implanted in their brains. Some of them were conditioned to have a seizure upon the very first electrical stimulation. Twice a day, five days a week for two weeks, they were electrocuted to make their brains more sensitive to stimulation, to the point where a seizure was triggered by the very first shock before they were administered the substances.

Regardless of which group they were in, their fate was sealed. The animal would suffer an epileptic fit and be euthanised immediately at the end of the test. If it survived, it would be used in further experiments. None of these 27,430 animals survived; they were all killed.

Months of struggle for mere documents

These atrocities were supposed to remain hidden. We refused to accept this state of affairs. To obtain the authorisation documents and assessment reports – which are, after all, public records – it took a struggle lasting several months, and we had to refer the matter to the Commission for Access to Administrative Documents (CADA). Its analysis confirmed what we had suspected: there was no serious evidence to justify the experimentation on more than 27,000 animals. The file even mentioned alternative methods such as neuron cultures and the study of brain samples. These were dismissed in a peremptory decision without further argument. The Ministry of Higher Education and Research approved the experiment without demanding further justification, taking the laboratory’s statements at face value. We challenged this authorisation in court.

A game-changing victory

On 3 July 2026, the Administrative Court of Appeal in Paris ruled in our favour. Its verdict is crystal clear and highlights an obvious truth: when it comes to inflicting such torture on sentient beings, ethics committees cannot merely rely on generalities. The balance between the suffering inflicted and the expected ‘benefits’ must be clearly assessed, the absence of alternatives verified, and the number of animals used justified.

Yet, for far too long, ethics committees have functioned merely as rubber-stamp bodies. Virtually no project is rejected, and France remains Europe’s leading country for animal experimentation, at the same time as European regulations are evolving, requiring Member States to draw up a strategy to phase out animal experimentation.

From now on, authorisations granted to laboratories will have to be properly justified. The suffering of animals can no longer be concealed behind a few hastily ticked boxes. This victory provides us with a powerful legal tool. It marks a step back for impunity and the code of silence. And it finally opens a breach for all animals who are victims of tests and protocols.

27,430 animals condemned: One Voice cracks down on the lack of transparency of the laboratories

An end to impunity: laboratories will finally have to justify the suffering inflicted on animals.

 

 

 

‘Goose neck’ game: despite the ban, Arfeuilles announces the return of an illegal practice

‘Goose neck’ game: despite the ban, Arfeuilles announces the return of an illegal practice

‘Goose neck’ game: despite the ban, Arfeuilles announces the return of an illegal practice
02.07.2026
Arfeuilles
‘Goose neck’ game: despite the ban, Arfeuilles announces the return of an illegal practice
Exploitation for shows

Last year, our campaign led to the cancellation of the ‘goose neck game’ in Arfeuilles in the Allier. The authorities had then clearly reiterated the legal framework: this practice has no place in local and popular festivals. A year later, however, the local council has announced its return to the programme for the patron saint’s day celebrations on 15 August 2026. By choosing to reintroduce this grim spectacle, the Arfeuilles council is flouting both the law and the warnings, showing the intention to revive a practice that we will never cease to oppose.

On 12 April, the Arfeuilles festival committee announced on its Facebook page the return of the ‘goose neck’ game as part of the summer festivities. Behind this name lies a practice involving the hanging of animal carcasses – geese, chickens, rabbits or others – killed specifically for the occasion, so that participants can attempt to tear off their heads or decapitate them with their bare hands. For One Voice, allowing such a spectacle to return is out of the question.

Extract from the Arfeuilles Festival Committee’s summer programme

An unambiguous ban

As early as 2025, our organisation had opposed the holding of this event. Thanks to our solicitor’s intervention with the Departmental Directorate for the Protection of Populations (DDPP), the event was ultimately cancelled.

The government authorities had at this time reiterated several key principles: the use of animal carcasses for entertainment purposes is prohibited, and the slaughter of an animal outside a slaughterhouse constitutes a criminal offence. Finally, animal carcasses, considered to be animal by-products, may not be used for this type of event. These legal reminders gave us hope that this practice was now a thing of the past.

The town hall remains silent

This year, as early as mid-April, we wrote to the mayor of Arfeuilles to seek clarification.

Our request was quite straightforward: Is this ‘event’ now a symbolic re-enactment, using items such as soft toys or piñatas, or does it once again involve the use of animal carcasses, in breach of the regulations? We also urged the council to prioritise festive alternatives that respect both animals and the law. To date, we have received no reply.

A practice we have been campaigning against for several years

Our campaign against the ‘goose neck game’ is nothing new. Back in September 2023, our investigation had already revealed what was taking place in Saint-Bonnet-près-Riom: around twenty animals decapitated during a ritual presented as a rite of passage into adulthood. These images caused a great deal of public outrage and helped to shed light on a largely unknown ‘tradition’. Since then, we have continued our work to ensure that these acts cease once and for all.

We must act before it is too late

We are once again calling on the municipality of Arfeuilles to abandon this medieval-style event if it involves the use of animal carcasses, and to opt for a symbolic version that respects both the animals and the regulations, as well as the sensibilities of the public.

You can also take action, for example by contacting Arfeuilles Town Hall to ask them, politely and respectfully, to abandon this practice once and for all. And if you haven’t already done so, please don’t hesitate to sign our petition to put an end to the ‘goose neck game’ throughout France.

To end the ‘goose neck’ game

Extrait du programme estival du Comité des Fêtes d’Arfeuilles

Une interdiction pourtant sans ambiguïté

En 2025 déjà, notre association s’était opposée à l’organisation de cette animation. Grâce à l’intervention de notre avocate auprès de la Direction départementale de la protection des populations (DDPP), la manifestation avait finalement été annulée.

Les services de l’État avaient alors rappelé plusieurs principes essentiels : l’utilisation de cadavres d’animaux dans le cadre d’un divertissement est interdite et l’abattage d’un animal en dehors d’un abattoir constitue un délit pénal. Enfin, les dépouilles animales, considérées comme des sous-produits animaux, ne peuvent être utilisées pour ce type d’événement. Ces rappels légaux laissaient espérer que cette pratique appartenait désormais au passé.

La mairie reste silencieuse

Cette année, dès la mi-avril, nous avons écrit au maire d’Arfeuilles afin d’obtenir des précisions.

Notre demande était pourtant simple : cette « animation » est-elle désormais une reconstitution symbolique, utilisant des objets tels que des peluches ou des piñatas, ou prévoit-elle une nouvelle fois l’emploi de dépouilles animales, en contradiction avec la réglementation ? Nous avons également invité la commune à privilégier des alternatives festives respectueuses des animaux comme de la loi. À ce jour, aucune réponse ne nous est parvenue.

Une pratique que nous combattons depuis plusieurs années

Notre mobilisation contre le « jeu du cou de l’oie » ne date pas d’hier. En septembre 2023, notre enquête révélait déjà ce qui se déroulait à Saint-Bonnet-près-Riom : une vingtaine d’animaux décapités lors d’un rituel présenté comme un passage à l’âge adulte. Ces images avaient suscité une vive émotion et permis de mettre en lumière une « tradition » largement méconnue. Depuis, nous poursuivons notre travail pour que ces actes cessent définitivement.

Agissons avant qu’il ne soit trop tard

Nous demandons une nouvelle fois à la commune d’Arfeuilles de renoncer à cette animation moyenâgeuse si elle implique l’utilisation de cadavres d’animaux et d’opter pour une version symbolique, respectueuse des animaux comme de la réglementation et de la sensibilité du public.

Vous pouvez également agir, par exemple en contactant la mairie d’Arfeuilles pour lui demander, avec courtoisie et respect, d’abandonner définitivement cette pratique. Et si ce n’est pas encore fait, n’hésitez pas à signer notre pétition pour mettre fin au « jeu du cou de l’oie » partout en France.

Pour la fin du jeu du cou de l’oie Pour la fin du jeu du cou de l’oie Pour la fin du jeu du cou de l’oie Pour la fin du jeu du cou de l’oie Pour la fin du jeu du cou de l’oie Pour la fin du jeu du cou de l’oie Pour la fin du jeu du cou de l’oie Pour la fin du jeu du cou de l’oie Pour la fin du jeu du cou de l’oie Pour la fin du jeu du cou de l’oie

The Court of Orléans on badgers: Press release

The Court of Orléans on badgers: Press release

The Court of Orléans on badgers: Press release
26.06.2026
Orléans
The Court of Orléans on badgers: Press release
Wildlife

One Voice, avec l’ASPAS, AVES et Nature 18, demande au tribunal administratif d’Orléans de suspendre en urgence l’arrêté qui autorise le prolongement de la vénerie sous terre des blaireaux dans le Cher, du 1ᵉʳ juin au 14 septembre 2026. Audience lundi 29 juin à 15 heures. Une nouvelle fois, des familles entières de blaireaux — petits compris — sont promises aux pioches et aux pinces des déterreurs.

Représentées par le cabinet Géo-avocats, les quatre associations dénoncent un arrêté qui ferme les yeux sur la souffrance, pour le seul agrément et loisir d’une poignée de pratiquants.

La vénerie sous terre consiste à lâcher des chiens dans les galeries pour acculer les blaireaux au fond de leur terrier, avant de les déterrer à la pioche et à la barre à mine, de les saisir avec de longues pinces métalliques et de les achever. Une traque qui peut durer des heures. Parmi les victimes : des blaireautins encore dépendants des adultes. C’est cette violence que One Voice documente depuis des années, enquêtes en infiltration à l’appui.

Tuer les petits est illégal : les juges le répètent

L’article L.424-10 du code de l’environnement interdit de détruire les petits des mammifères chassables. Et le « petit », scientifiquement, c’est un animal qui n’a pas atteint sa maturité sexuelle. Chez les blaireaux, l’émancipation à l’égard des adultes n’intervient qu’à l’automne. La période complémentaire revient donc à massacrer des jeunes que la loi protège — directement, et indirectement en abattant les adultes dont ils dépendent encore. 

Les juridictions administratives retiennent ce critère de l’émancipation, et la cour administrative d’appel de Bordeaux l’a confirmé sans ambiguïté le 24 février 2026 : les jeunes blaireaux encore dépendants sont des « petits » protégés. Rien, ni de prétendus dégâts ni une prétendue surpopulation, ne justifie d’y déroger.

Dans le Cher, un arrêté en trompe-l’œil

Pour justifier le déterrage, la préfecture invoque « l’augmentation de plaintes de dégâts de blaireaux reçues ». Une réalité qu’elle n’a, de son propre aveu, jamais vérifiée.

Et si l’arrêté affiche quelques garde-fous censés répondre aux annulations déjà prononcées par le tribunal administratif d’Orléans, ce ne sont que des leurres :

  • Un quota de 300 blaireaux — ce qui est énorme pour une espèce dont on ne connait pas les effectifs et au rythme de reproduction lent.
  • Une chasse limitée aux week-ends, lundis et jours fériés — ce qui est déjà le cas depuis 2021 au moins, ce loisir se pratiquant de toute façon hors des jours ouvrés.
  • Un périmètre étendu jusqu’à 250 mètres des terres agricoles, jachères, prairies, vignes et vergers : autrement dit, dans un département agricole à 60 % et bordé de bois, exactement là où vivent les blaireaux, en lisière de forêt et dans le bocage.

Sous couvert d’encadrement, l’arrêté livre donc aux déterreurs l’essentiel des blaireautières.

Les préfectures s’entêtent, la justice tranche

Cette audience s’ajoute à une longue série de revers infligés aux arrêtés de déterrage : suspension dans la Marne par le tribunal administratif de Châlons-en-Champagne le 7 mai 2026, annulation par celui de Limoges des arrêtés pris en 2024 dans la Creuse, la Corrèze et la Haute-Vienne. Partout, le même constat : les préfectures ne peuvent continuer à autoriser ce massacre. One Voice et ses partenaires entendent l’obtenir aussi dans le Cher.

Illegal trade in animals on Leboncoin: the courts turn a blind eye

Illegal trade in animals on Leboncoin: the courts turn a blind eye

Illegal trade in animals on Leboncoin: the courts turn a blind eye
25.06.2026
Illegal trade in animals on Leboncoin: the courts turn a blind eye
Domestic animals

Despite the law of 2021, thousands of unregistered cats and dogs have continued to be advertised on the website Leboncoin. In 2023 alone, the Toulouse-based association ‘L’école du chat libre’ recorded 4,500 illegal adverts concerning nearly 11,000 animals in just a few months. Together, we then took the matter to court. After more than two years of proceedings, the court dismissed the case on the grounds of ‘good faith’. This is a worrying decision that highlights the issue of online trade in animals, trafficking and abandonment.

In France, all dogs and cats must be identified by a microchip or a tattoo. When they are sold online, online advertising platforms such as Leboncoin must ensure that identification is present and are obliged to verify this information. This principle is not a recommendation. It is a legal obligation laid down by the law of November 2021. Its aim is clear: to put an end to the lucrative trade carried out at the expense of our pets and the collateral damage that goes with it: trafficking and abandonment.

What Leboncoin is doing

As early as 2021, Leboncoin should have taken action and put a verification system in place. Instead, the platform turned a blind eye. As a result, for years, thousands of animals were sold without identification, sometimes before they had reached the legal age. In 2023, together with our partner, L’école du chat libre in Toulouse, we lodged a complaint. This complaint was well-founded, backed up by a meticulous survey of 4,500 illegal adverts concerning nearly 11,000 animals between April and November 2023. We were simply asking for the law to be enforced.

What the courts are saying

We recently received a ruling dismissing the case. Yet the court acknowledged that: yes, Leboncoin had failed to put a monitoring system in place after 2021; yes, adverts were published for years after the legislation came into force. But the platform is considered to have acted ‘in good faith’ because its monitoring system was not yet operational.

A company can thus flout the law for two years, then eventually comply with it because it is being prosecuted, without facing any further consequences. It could at the very least have suspended the publication of adverts while waiting for the monitoring system to be up and running, but it did not do so. Case closed. In the meantime, thousands of animals are paying the price for this inaction.

The internet: a supermarket for living beings

Every day, adverts for dogs and cats spring up on these platforms. Heart-warming photos, enticing promises, immediate availability: everything encourages impulse buying. But behind these adverts lie clandestine breeding operations – veritable puppy and kitten factories churning out animals in conditions of utter distress to meet a demand fuelled by the immediacy of a click. Not to mention the many private individuals who also feed into this system, failing to neuter their pets and giving away or selling unwanted litters.

People want a cute, cheap puppy – right now. The buyer sometimes receives a sick, traumatised, unidentified animal, making any traceability impossible.

From advert to abandonment

These online sales have direct consequences. Animals acquired on a whim are more likely to be abandoned: because care is expensive, because holidays are coming up, or because a move disrupts daily life. In France, tens of thousands of animals are abandoned in this way every year; the luckiest end up in shelters, while the others end up in animal pounds. For the latter, time is of the essence. Once the statutory eight-day period has passed, if they are not claimed, they are put down.

The law of 2021 aimed to put an end to this vicious circle. Leboncoin continued to flout it for years. And today, the courts rule: ‘in good faith’.

This dismissal of the case does not erase the facts. It does not dampen our resolve. More than ever, we remain vigilant against illegal adverts, we will continue to document them, to call for an outright ban on online donations and sales, and to demand a national neutering programme. In this fight, everyone can take action. By writing to Leboncoin*, and reporting suspicious adverts, you are helping to bring about change. Join the fight with us!

* A template letter is available by clicking on this link.

Illegal trade in animals on Leboncoin: the courts turn a blind eye

Thousands of animals sold illegally on Leboncoin: ‘in good faith’, according to the courts.