Archives: News

In Lot-et-Garonne, ‘hunting’ dogs are left to their own devices in a barn: One Voice is investigating and filing a complaint

In Lot-et-Garonne, ‘hunting’ dogs are left to their own devices in a barn: One Voice is investigating and filing a complaint

In Lot-et-Garonne, ‘hunting’ dogs are left to their own devices in a barn: One Voice is investigating and filing a complaint
01.02.2023
In Lot-et-Garonne, ‘hunting’ dogs are left to their own devices in a barn: One Voice is investigating and filing a complaint
Hunting

Around ten dogs exploited for hunting and kept year-round in an almost abandoned barn at the bottom of a wood: out of sight, out of mind? Not for One Voice, who are blowing the whistle and filing a complaint at the Agen legal tribunal.

After an alarming warning of dogs being kept shut up year-round behind bars in a barn lost in the woods on the outskirts of Agen, our investigators have gone to the premises. They discovered, while going along a wooded path, a prison building, all very banal in appearance, except for the ten or so dogs found there kept without supervision. This dilapidated place, containing tools and all kinds of objects thrown here and there, plastic bags, breeze blocks, floorboards, wires, and with hard, uneven ground, strewn with faeces between the dirt and stones… And in the middle of these boxes of odds and ends, at the mercy of the cold and wind at that time, but also the stuffiness of the air during the spring, around ten dogs were calling out for help.

Like a weapon: a life of boredom at the shed, or hunting

‘Hunting’ dogs, so to speak: forced to work at hunters’ service until they are exhausted, and kept far from dwellings such as in Chaux-du-Dombief so as not to disrupt the neighbourhood, but also out of the sight and attention of those who might worry about their welfare.

Dogs like any other!

Despite nothing differentiating them from other dogs with regard to legislation, these dogs are seen as tools by their exploiters and as a collective, not as individuals. Only the pack counts. Hunters are interested in them sparing no effort, not being scared by the gunshots, and being at their beck and call. And if one of them dies, it will quickly be replaced. For the rest of them, outside of hunting, they are stored in places like this one so as not to ‘bother’ anyone with their barking.

After a day spent hunting, some of them have eye injuries or are limping, others scratch intensely. They find their bowls empty and disgusting from the previous week, or even a little cocktail of yellow stagnant water that looks like urine. They share the contents of a crate filled with several animal limbs left out in the open air which leaves them susceptible to becoming unwell. We realise that what we thought were stones on the floor is in reality a carpet of bones. There are even animal skulls in the straw.

#NotAllHunters

Many hunters deny the facts that we have documented, maintaining that they are not like that, that they love their dogs and treat them properly with forced photos on social media. But where are they when we defend the dogs that they love so much? Why are they siding with Goliath and not David in this battle of the iron pot against the earthen pot, if, really, they want the best for the so-called ‘hunting’ dogs? Why are they not at least morally condemning this abuse, and why do they prefer to boast by publishing photos that have nothing to do with the problem?

We are filing a complaint for mistreatment at the Agen legal tribunal. To support us in this process and allow these dogs to be rescued as quickly as possible and to find a loving home, sign our petition for hunting dogs !

Translated from the French by Joely Justice

The Pyrénées-Orientales Prefect is playing hide and seek with his decrees

The Pyrénées-Orientales Prefect is playing hide and seek with his decrees

The Pyrénées-Orientales Prefect is playing hide and seek with his decrees
30.01.2023
The Pyrénées-Orientales Prefect is playing hide and seek with his decrees
Hunting

For years, the Pyrénées-Orientales Prefecture has published, in total opposition to French law, many decrees retrospectively authorising pure and simple destructions of animals carried out the month before. Since they have learned of this procedure, One Voice has alerted those concerned. The only response that the Association has had in return: silence. Call for the Prefect to force them to stop this intolerable practice.

French law is unambiguous: administrative acts only come into effect after their official publication. Yet, since 2015, the Pyrénées-Orientales Prefect, under pressure from those who wish to practice their lethal hobby without being questioned, has been agreeing to evade French law.

In fact, at the time of the monthly publication of the so-called normal register of administrative acts (RAA) on their website, the Prefecture has taken the opportunity to make a large number of the decrees already being implemented, or even already implemented, public.

More than 200 decrees retrospectively passed

In 2022, they also published 238 decrees retrospectively allowing the ‘management’ of populations of wild boars, badgers, foxes, deer, pigeons, etc. with official hunts and/or individual shots. The ‘destructions’ had been carried out day and night with light sources in many towns, and sometimes even as close to 150 metres from houses.

In the greatest secrecy, the Prefect authorised a wolf-hunting lieutenant, accompanied by local hunters of their choice or even wolf-hunter lieutenants from neighbouring areas, to kill an unlimited number of individuals over a period ranging from a few days to around a month.

It was only once the ‘management operations’ were completed, or about to be completed, that the authorisation act was published on the Internet, too late for any of us to know…

Trampled democratic principles!

This practice is scandalous and completely undemocratic! It prevents all of those concerned from knowing about these authorisations within a reasonable time scale. It particularly deprives associations, such as One Voice, from the possibility of referring them to the appropriate courts to try to get them cancelled.

We are fighting for a minimum period of fifteen days to be introduced between the publication of decrees authorising official hunts or individual shots and the actual start of operations – something which is still not planned for currently. In fact, the publication frequently comes in one or two days after the hunts, making any legal appeal impossible and pointless, just as the case was specifically for the ibex in Bargy.

When it comes to the Pyrénées-Orientales, we have contacted the Prefect, Mr Rodrigue Furcy, several times. Unsurprisingly, we have not received any response. Worse, despite our many letters, he continues to publish his decrees well after them coming into effect.

The almost total disinterest of the political representatives for animal advocates is clearly demonstrated once again: the Prefecture proves their lack of consideration for animals who will be killed, alongside their contempt regarding our initiative for more transparency and legitimacy.

Let’s demand that the Prefecture respects the law!

Send the letter, downloadable here, to the Prefect. Thanks to you, there will be no other choice than to admit that this practice is illegal and to stop it as soon as possible.

Example: decree of 1 December… published on 4 January 2023

Translated from the French by Joely Justice

No respite for wolves: new year, new massacres

No respite for wolves: new year, new massacres

No respite for wolves: new year, new massacres
27.01.2023
No respite for wolves: new year, new massacres
Wildlife

Wolves, who belong to a protected species, can be slaughtered completely legally in France. However, these legalised massacres do not even seem to be sufficient for their opponents, since wolves are also victims of poaching, killed outside of any legal framework.One Voice regularly challenges Prefectural decrees authorising lethal shots on wolves, and more widely is fighting to stop this carnage from happening.

An exemption to the protection of the species applied with no reflection

While wolves are protected by the Bern Convention and the European Union Habitats Directive, it is completely possible to slaughter them “to prevent significant damage particularly to crops, farms, forests, fisheries, water, and other types of property”, according to Article L. 411-2 of the Environmental Code.

In France, when shots have been authorised by prefectural decrees, wolves that approach herds can be killed without question. Never mind if the animals eliminated are not those who are directly involved in the attacks. Complete nonsense that is denied by our neighbours, who do everything they can to minimise the instability of packs and the impact that the lupine population has on conservation. The disappearance of a breeding male effectively destroys the social structure of the pack and increases the risk of its members dispersing, jeopardising their survival and increasing the risk of disruptive attacks by wolves operating alone from that point. But is it not the eventual aim of the French State, under pressure from lobbies, to further demonise wolves?

In Austria, only specifically designated wolves can be killed. They therefore make sure that the wolf that causes the attack will be slaughtered – a wolf who, let’s remember, does not kill for pleasure but out of necessity to feed itself. Killing another other animal is forbidden. An Austrian tribunal incidentally cancelled a shooting authorisation in December 2020, given that the risk of killing another wolf – that was not responsible for past attacks – was too high.

In Switzerland, wolves are not chosen randomly: it must be a young animal so as not to disturb the hierarchical configuration, on the condition that the pack has successfully reproduced, and only if said pack has killed at least ten livestock animals in four months.

In France, the number of individuals slaughtered is constantly growing. Until this policy exterminating wolves ends, One Voice will ensure that the (minimal) conditions necessary to obtain a destruction authorisation are followed, which unfortunately is not always the case.

Two weeks after the start of the new year, two wolves have already been killed by hunters

The killing of wolves is monitored by the DREAL [Direction régionale de l’Environnement, de l’Aménagement et du Logement – Regional Directorate for the Environment, Development, and Housing] in Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, who would rather put these killings down under the pleasant description of “an intervention protocol for the wolf population”, probably to try and minimise the severity and make people believe that, as their name suggests, they are concerned about the environment.

In 2023, 174 wolves could therefore be slaughtered completely legally. Scarcely twenty days after the start of the new year, this was already the case for two of them: the first in the Alpes-de-Haute-Provence Department due to derogation shots, the second “deliberately destroyed outside of the protocol” (poached, in reality), somewhere in France with no further precision, as the DREAL tracking chart shows.

About a year ago, we challenged two agricultural unions who called on their members to poach wolves, bragging about having “bullets and poison”. However, “incitement to commit an offence harming a protected species” is only a crime if it is followed by a result (an individual kills a wolf in response to the union’s incitement). This lack of violation is highly contestable. An amendment was filed against this scandal under the Biodiversity law framework, but was unfortunately rejected…

There has been no information on the first two victims of 2023 in the media. On the Alpes-de-Haute-Provence Prefecture’s website there is no more information on the wolf concerned but there is a call for applications to appoint a wolf-hunting lieutenant who will participate, among other things, “in operations provided for in the ‘wolf’ protocol” – including: “will participate in the killing of wolves”.

Wolves are animals with complex emotional intelligence. But according to the State, they are simply heads to be cut off to please hunters who only think about nature and its wildlife in the context of the prism of immediate profits that they can derive from it. We are still here, despite the catastrophic situation in which biodiversity finds itself.

It is all the more despicable that no scientific study has shown that killing wolves would significantly reduce their impact on farm animals, who, let’s not forget, will end up at the abattoir after a (short) life of being exploited in an over-grazed environment.

Translated from the French by Joely Justice

Press conference at the Grenoble Chatipi for stray cats on 23 January 2023 at 10:45am

One Voice, who has been fighting against feline straying for years, has implemented the educational Chatipi programme, which educates the population on cats in general and allows these felines with no human family to no longer suffer in misery. One Voice is also implementing three-way partnerships with town councils (or residential areas) and local associations to microchip and most importantly neuter homeless cats and release them if they cannot be adopted, while providing them with a wooden chalet for them to rehydrate themselves, eat, and take comfort. This is what has happened in Grenoble, where an agreement was signed between the town, Cosa Animalia, and One Voice. A press conference will take place on Monday 23 January at 10:45am.