News Archive - One voice

One Voice, with AVES and other partners, attack the umpteenth ministerial anti-wolf decree

One Voice, with AVES and other partners, attack the umpteenth ministerial anti-wolf decree
25.06.2025
France
One Voice, with AVES and other partners, attack the umpteenth ministerial anti-wolf decree
Wildlife

Yet another ministerial decree published on June 21, making it easier to kill wolves… The French Ministries of Ecological Transition and Agriculture continue to claim that no protection measures are feasible for certain herds, while publishing a list of so-called “measures”… which are precisely that. This crude manipulation calls for a firm response. One Voice, together with AVES and other partners, are once again taking legal action to overturn this unjustifiable text.

Shameless ministerial duplicity

In February, a first decree modified the legal framework surrounding the shooting of wolves, introducing the fiction of the “non-protectability” of cows and horses. This concept, undefined at the time, has now been “clarified” in a decree published six months later. The result: these famous “vulnerability reduction measures” are protection devices, already admitted for sheep and goat farms, for example.

In other words, the ministries have deliberately twisted reality in order to get their project through. The deception is obvious, the intention crystal-clear: to disguise a culling scheme under the guise of “management”.

We denounced this diversionary tactic during the public consultation. We are now fighting it in court, as we did with the previous text. The government cannot continue to manipulate texts with impunity, to better delegitimize any attempt at coexistence between humans and wild animals.

Why not go all the way and finance these new measures, recognizing them as real protection? Because it’s much easier to feed the hatred that breeders have for wolves than to find real solutions for coexistence. Do we need to repeat once again that lethal shooting is not effective? The National Assembly’s report on pastoralism, published last April, demonstrates as much, in line with our own study on the same subject.

A circumvention strategy to better slaughter

Let’s make no mistake: this is not about improving herd protection. These measures will be neither officially recognized nor financed. They serve only one purpose: to provide administrative justification for shooting. Farmers, left to their own devices, will find no concrete help. On the other hand, they will be granted the right to kill.

Since the Council of the European Union approved the downlisting of wolves, the most brutal rhetoric has been unleashed. Some MPs, galvanized by this setback, no longer even try to hide their desire for extermination. Deputy Pierre Cordier put it bluntly in the Assembly: “Fences are useless; we have to shoot!” Not a single voice was raised to contradict this chilling statement.

Towards systematic elimination

These are not mere aberrations: this is a deliberate policy of elimination. The prefect in charge of the national wolf action plan expressed surprise at the “unprecedented number” of wolves killed. Not because she was alarmed, but because she feared that the annual quota would be reached too soon. Her main concern was how much room for manoeuvre there was left to continue bowing to the injunctions of the agro-pastoral lobbies.

We resist

In the face of this methodical offensive against a species native of our part of the world, we will not bend. We call on all those who reject this logic of extermination to mobilize. On July 2, especially for Camille, Milo and Mina, we’ll be in Mâcon and Tulle respectively, where we’ll be speaking out loud and clear for the wolves. If you can’t join us, please sign and share our petition. Together, let’s stop this policy of annihilation.

Saône-et-Loire: a new wolf, but the same old hatred

Saône-et-Loire: a new wolf, but the same old hatred
19.06.2025
Saône-et-Loire
Saône-et-Loire: a new wolf, but the same old hatred
Wildlife

Since 2019, wolves have been making timid attempts to return to the Saône-et-Loire region. Each time, the same story repeats itself: the animal settles in, triggers the fury of the agricultural lobbies, and is then shot. In 2020, 2021, 2023… all were killed. While we should be investing massively in means of protection, on May 15, the prefect decided to reduce the protection measures that farmers in six villages are required to implement in order to obtain public subsidies. Because cohabitation between humans and wildlife is the only viable option, we are challenging this decree before the Dijon administrative court.

Photo : OFB-SD71

Camille, the latest wolf to have settled in Morey, targeted

In December 2023, in the Saône-et-Loire region, a wolf was shot in the thigh. After surviving for months in excruciating pain, he was found dead in February 2025, in suspicious conditions that prompted us to lodge a complaint. We had offered to transfer him to a sanctuary in Italy. We were met with silence from the authorities.

A few weeks ago, a new individual, Camille, was spotted in Morey, in the same town as his injured predecessor. Images captured by a camera trap were authenticated by the prefecture on May 12. This simple observation was enough to rekindle tensions. In an open letter, the FDSEA and Jeunes Agriculteurs 71 immediately called for the wolf to be purely and solely eliminated.

The prefect gives in to the lobbies’ pressure

For the representatives of intensive agriculture, Camille’s slaughter was not enough. They have only one objective: to eradicate wolves at any cost. They’re not interested in protection measures, and they strongly influenced the prefect with a simple message: fewer protection measures, more money for farmers. In short, they want to have their cake and eat it too.

Welcomed on site on May 13 with sheep carcasses in protest, the prefect gave in two days later. From now on, in the six villages concerned, in order to be subsidized, farmers will no longer have to implement two protection measures (“circle one”), but only one (“circle two”).

Faced with this renunciation, we have made a request with the Dijon administrative court to have the prefectoral decree annulled. Killing Camille won’t solve anything. Rather than give in to retrograde lobbies, it’s high time to invest massively in protection measures, which are the only way to ensure harmonious cohabitation between wolves and humans.

Join us in front of the Mâcon prefecture on July 2 at 10am, for Camille. Sign so that wolves can finally live in peace.

Illegal sale of a lion to a taxidermist: the Gougeon family reoffends

Illegal sale of a lion to a taxidermist: the Gougeon family reoffends
19.06.2025
France
Illegal sale of a lion to a taxidermist: the Gougeon family reoffends
Exploitation for shows

In the spring of 2025, we received documents indicating that a trainer well known to our association had sold a lion to a foreign taxidermist, who in turn sold the stuffed animal to a Parisian company. The only snag in this system, which still allows animals to be “stuffed” on top of their lives of misery, is that the circus had no right to own the animal, and even less to sell him to enrich itself at his expense. Faced with this shameful and illegal transaction, we filed a complaint with the Paris public prosecutor’s office.

Wild felines treated as objects even after their death

Teddy Gougeon must really enjoy appearing before the court… In 2024, we already had him convicted for his illegal exploitation of non-domestic animals, for which he had no certificate of competence, and for mistreatment by a professional. The verdict: a six-month suspended prison sentence and a 5-year ban on keeping wild animals for William Zavatta Circus’ trainer.

We now know that the circus trainer didn’t stop there, as he sold to a taxidermist the remains of a lion he had no right to own or sell to anyone. How was this lion killed before being put in a tanning bath, like Dorian before him? Did he even have a name? After a lifetime of exploitation, his tormentors did not hesitate to benefit from him one last time, engaging in a totally prohibited form of trafficking. They have even managed to obtain a permit to export the body to Indonesia from the Direction régionale et interdépartementale de l’environnement, de l’aménagement et des transports (DRIEAT Île-de-France) in December 2024. Everything seems to be going swimmingly for the animals’ enemies…

Towards a botched law… and unbridled traffic?

This isn’t the first time we’ve denounced these actions. In 2021, we had already uncovered the maneuvers of a trainer from the same family, Joseph Gougeon, who had used the services of an unlicensed taxidermist, whom we had investigated. A juicy trade that can bring in over 10,000 euros for each individual whose skin is greedily plucked… and which has enough to entice circus performers. Now that the ban on wild animals in traveling circuses is about to come into force, and the French Ministry of Ecological Transition has definitively given up on funding sanctuary places, what are they going to do with the animals they can no longer whip under their big tops? True to form, it’s a safe bet that they’ll choose the most profitable option, to the detriment of the animals and in defiance of the law… Will the State also wash its hands of the matter, if wildlife trafficking shoots up as a result of its incompetence? We won’t allow it!

On behalf of the lion killed and sold for shipment abroad, we have filed a complaint against Teddy Gougeon and the taxidermy company involved, and are calling for an investigation. Add your voice to ours by signing our petition: Say no to animals in circuses!

Tony Zavatta circus: the same suffering for “domestic” and wild animals

Tony Zavatta circus: the same suffering for “domestic” and wild animals
05.06.2025
France
Tony Zavatta circus: the same suffering for “domestic” and wild animals
Exploitation for shows

After receiving several reports in April of the very worrying condition of a camel at Tony Zavatta Circus (Gougeon production), and dispatching investigators to the site in May, One Voice lodged a complaint of mistreatment, which was closed almost immediately, which is a disgrace. These practices involving animals considered domestic will continue for a long time to come, as they are not affected by the legal ban on traveling circuses scheduled for December 2028. And yet, as their suffering is the same, we defend them too.

On May 7, we posted images from a whistle-blower showing a camel held by Tony Zavatta Circus, then based in Luçon (85). Constrained to three meters of chain as its only radius of movement, without water or shelter, with humps in very poor condition, he moved on the spot, displaying abnormal and stereotyped behavior, a clear sign of malaise among captive animals. But he’s not the only one affected by the deleterious conditions of detention in this circus.

Endless detention with appalling consequences

A few days later, in La Chaize-le-Vicomte (85), we filmed the same camelid, still tethered. Lacking sufficient freedom of movement, he tramples aimlessly for hours on end, as if lost in a mirage where he’s crossing vast lands, as his nature predestined him to do, or circling his post, reproducing his training routine ad nauseam. At times, he explodes, struggles, desperately trying to free himself.

A little further on, a younger camel is restless, clearly having nervous breakdowns. Full of the energy peculiar to his age, he would certainly prefer to leap and gambol, but that’s impossible for him as it is, as his makeshift cage isn’t twice his size. His only possible stimuli: licking a knotted cord or chewing on a billboard, hung on one of his prison’s metal gates.

Surrounding him on this construction site are llamas, ponies and dromedaries, kept in scandalously similar conditions. These other companions are also chained very tightly, confined among stocks of materials or along a path accessible to anyone. When some of these captives have the “luxury” of having a household bucket as a water source, their tie, the length of which is decided by the circus workers, systematically prevents them from drinking from it!

How difficult it is to have such suffering legally recorded…

On May 16, One Voice filed a complaint for mistreatment of animals by professionals, which constitutes an aggravating circumstance. We have also requested an urgent inspection by the local authorities of the owner of Tony Zavatta Circus, one of the members of the indescribable Gougeon family.

This is not the first time (far from it!) that the brothers and cousins, who are also at the head of the circuses Italiano and Idéal, as well as of Nouveau Cirque Triomphe – the list goes on – have found themselves concerned by our complaints. Among the most recent cases to date, we’ve already had those of the Paris Circus convicted of abusing Jon as well as Patty, Céleste, Marly and Hannah.

Following up on our alert, the Vendée prefecture replied, assuring us of their “vigilance in this matter”. While we were pleasantly surprised that the gendarmerie and municipal police were dispatched to the site for “administrative checks and an inspection of the animals”, we regret that no institutional service trained to analyze animal behavior was also asked to carry out ethological observations. What immediate corrective actions were ordered on site? A veterinary inspection? The seizure of camelids in poor health? No, the circus owners were simply asked to increase the length of their ties!

To add insult to injury, while dismissing our complaint, State officials confirmed the stereotypical behavior of certain captives. Worse still, this suffering is trivialized by invoking their fatal destiny, doomed to “circus exploitation”. An admission of insufficient human resources and institutional complacency towards abusive circus practices. The real distress of these sentient individuals is negated by lacunary legislation.

Even if our complaint was unsuccessful this time, we won’t give in!

generics.video.play

Non-wild animals, the great forgotten of the law

Let’s not forget that these living beings are, in the eyes of the legislation dated November 30, 2021, considered as domestic and will therefore not be affected by the forthcoming ban of December 1, 2028. So many lofty ambitions had taken seed, and now this law is missing its initial objectives, leaving room for a variety of interpretations to the detriment of those first concerned, many of whom will continue to be trained, exploited… or others simply forgotten, as here, due to a general lack of controls, or which are clearly only in name. Meanwhile, circus owners will even be compensated with public money to continue subjugating sentient individuals over and over again!

There’s only one solution: a total ban on animals in circuses. Help us change the law by signing our petition.

Traumatic flashball scare shots on wolves

Traumatic flashball scare shots on wolves
02.06.2025
Haute-Savoie
Traumatic flashball scare shots on wolves
Wildlife

We thought we’d seen it all, but now we’re stunned. Wolves are about to undergo a terrifying experiment. A pack in the Haute-Savoie region is to be disturbed and its individuals captured. And for what? To test the effects of a variant of shooting: “traumatic” scaring shots (TEFT) [sic]. Although this initiative is an attempt to find answers to the incessant culling of canids, questions remain as to the real interest of this experiment and its considerable impact.

In September 2024, a public consultation was opened on an experimental project to test a new, non-lethal method of scaring off wolves.

Spearheaded by two recognized organizations, Asters – Haute-Savoie Conservatory of Natural Spaces (CEN74) and the Institute for the Promotion and Research on Protection Animals (IPRA), the project involves capturing up to five individuals, fitting them with GPS collars and, once released, studying their reactions to flashball discharges when attempting to predate flocks. The captures were authorized by two orders issued by the Prefect of Haute-Savoie on March 17, 2025.

A good idea to combat lethal shooting… but nothing new

What’s hard to understand is that breeders can already carry out scare shots, so why inflict further trauma on wolves?

Is the aim to inflict further pain and fear? This remains unclear, all the more so as the project’s leads themselves acknowledge that this method is “promising but as yet poorly documented”. In other words, we’re about to test a form of increased violence on wolves, with no real guarantee of its effects or effectiveness.

Further persecution

In Passy, after the escaped goats in the prefect’s sights, the wolves are about to be subjected to severe psychological and physical shocks. Is it really necessary to capture five of them, who are already being hunted down relentlessly, in order to verify that these shots are more effective when they prove to be “traumatic”?

High-risk capture, trapping and sequestration for protected animals

The terms of the project’s non-technical summary (RNT) are unambiguous: this is a “non-lethal but painful scaring method”.

The TEFT project presents significant risks for wolves, both during capture and shooting. Trapping and anaesthetizing can lead to stress, motor disorders, injuries of varying degrees of severity, and disruption of social dynamics within the pack. The flashball shots themselves, although qualified as non-lethal, can nevertheless cause pain, behavioral alterations and, in the event of poor execution, potential handicaps. In fact, the aim of the project is to “subject [the wolf] to a painful experience, so that it learns to avoid herds as a result of this bad experience”. Serious consequences for members of a protected species…

The animals will – fortunately – be “returned to their natural habitat”, but at what cost to their lives and those of their families? A member of the Blaitière pack targeted by these measures was captured on April 6. Who is it? The father or the mother? Did the cubs witness it? The stability and equilibrium of the group help to channel and educate the youngsters.

To put an end to the persecution of wolves in all their forms, sign our petition.

Behind the official figures for animal experimentation, reality remains unchanged

Behind the official figures for animal experimentation, reality remains unchanged
27.05.2025
France
Behind the official figures for animal experimentation, reality remains unchanged
Animal testing

The Ministry congratulates itself for a slight drop in the number of animals used in experiments for the first time in 2023, but more than 2 million individuals were still involved that year. The official figures continue to exclude countless living beings, invisible in the reports. Not to mention the fact that 90% of experiments are not legally required.

Behind the coldness of technical terms such as « use » and so-called « moderate » suffering lie very real, painful experiences.

One Voice deciphers what the falsely transparent figures do not show.

In its 2023 statistical survey, the French Ministry of Higher Education and Research (MESR) congratulated itself for a slight drop in the number of living beings exploited for the first time in experiments during the year. However, the 2 million mark is still exceeded, whether we consider the total number of animals tested (2,030,513) or the number of first uses in 2023 (2,046,754). It is important to remember that the MESR only counts the first scalpel stroke given to an individual during the year: reuses during the same year are not taken into account.

What’s more, behind these overall figures, there are still major disparities between species: 20% of hamsters still undergo procedures classified as « severe », and although dogs account for just 0.2% of uses, the figures for them are on the rise.

Thousands of lives overlooked by ministerial reports

Every year, official data on animal experimentation remains largely underestimated… It doesn’t take into account animals used outside regulated procedures. These animals are only declared to the European Commission every five years. This is the case, for example, of individuals bred solely to reproduce genetically modified lines, or of those killed to remove their organs or tissues for in vitro research. These practices are sometimes referred to as « New Methodological Approaches » (NMAs), a term that leads to confusion: we’re not talking here about « Non-Animal Methods », but rather about the additional use of countless living beings! Rather than marking a break with in vivo experimentation, these practices add to it, as animals continue to be killed to satisfy the demands of a research system that is struggling to evolve.

Invisible in falsely transparent annual reports, all excluded from official data, they disappear in a persistent opacity.

When the category of « moderate » suffering is used to mask reality

The MESR points to a drop in the most unbearable experiments, described as « severe », from 11.5% in 2022 to 9.3% in 2023. It also claims that 87% of cases would fall into the « mild » or « moderate » severity category.

But these percentages mask an entirely different reality: of the 2,046,754 uses recorded in 2023, the moderate and severe categories alone account for almost half of all cases.

What does MESR consider moderate pain?

« mutant mice » killed because they had become ‘too old’ following a delay in delivery, then replaced by others to undergo multiple injections before being placed on a hot plate;
another 2,500 were injected with cancer cells into their bladders, developing weight loss, prostration, urinary pain and anorexia before being killed;
or 1,136 of these small rodents implanted with a tumor and subjected to repeated oral force-feeding with fecal matter…

To what extent has this « moderate » level of severity become the norm for procedures that are nonetheless profoundly invasive? Practices remain violent, only the indicators are adapting.

90% of animal experiments are not required by law

Of these 2,046,754 uses of living beings, only a quarter (449,790) fall into the category of « regulatory studies and routine production ». Less than half (206,987) respond to legislative or regulatory requirements, generally European. Consequently, barely 10% of experiments in 2023 are required by law.

The remaining 1,839,767 could be replaced by alternative methods.

If, like three quarters of French people, you support the end of animal experimentation (One Voice/Ipsos April 2023), and believe in alternative methods, join us in calling for an end to these outdated practices!

How to track down every last wolf according to the State: new public consultation

How to track down every last wolf according to the State: new public consultation
28.05.2025
France
How to track down every last wolf according to the State: new public consultation
Wildlife

Here we go again: the French government is once again consulting the public to modify the ministerial decree orchestrating the shooting of wolves. One might have hoped that the Ministries of Ecological Transition and Agriculture would have finally reconsidered their position and recognized that herds of cows, horses and donkeys are indeed protectable, but this is not the case! This text is just as hypocritical as the previous ones.

The administration is ever more hypocritical about protection measures

The proposed modifications are nothing more than a smokescreen… Admittedly, the notorious “vulnerability reduction measures” have finally been defined… almost six months after the first public consultation. But what’s absurd is that these “options” include recognized means of protection for sheep and goats (if only they were actually implemented…): surveillance, dogs and electrified pens. We’d be laughing if it weren’t so pathetic.

All the while, the State was proclaiming loud and clear that cow herds could not be protected, going so far as to modify the ministerial project last February at the request of the lobbies: it was the Savoie Mont-Blanc Interdepartmental Chamber of Agriculture that was behind the first amendment to the text. As for the prefects, they haven’t even bothered to carry out the technico-economic analysis required to prove this pretty fable defended by the administration. That’s why we were attacking their illegal decrees en masse.

All this fuss, only to find that the “vulnerability reduction measures” they pulled out of the hat included “real” protection measures.

But to question themselves and withdraw the provision relating to the so-called “absence of a technically valid protection scheme”, absolutely not! Breeders shouldn’t think that our dear ministers are turning their backs on them and refusing to shoot wolves. In the meantime, it’s the same old story: these “proposals” won’t be funded.

They all want wolves dead

Because yes, that’s what’s going on: politicians who hate all living creatures have a single goal: to exterminate wolves. Yet another fine example of their political hijacking: they rush to the bedside of the “overwhelmed” breeders and stir up their thirst for death even more.

When it comes to nauseating draft resolutions against wolves and trampling on their future and that of biodiversity, they always come forward. But when it comes to thinking instead of using rifles, and to actively monitoring animals destined for the slaughterhouse, there’s no one left.

The example of Camille, the latest wolf to appear in the Saône-et-Loire region, is blatantly obvious: as with his predecessor, everyone, including the Minister of Agriculture, wants to see him dead. The prefect has made it easier to shoot wolves, and has swept aside the obligation to protect flocks.

It cannot be repeated often enough: systematically killing wolves will change nothing, because others will come. These majestic animals are here, and they have the right to live.

As for Milo and Mina’s situation on the Millevaches plateau, it shows that the lobbies are fiercely opposed to the development of any form of wildlife. It’s time to get up to date: 8 out of 10 French people (Ipsos/One Voice poll, November 2024) believe that wolves have their rightful place in nature.

Act with us for all wolves in France by denouncing the inadequacy of the measures proposed in the text submitted for public consultation. And to put an end to their persecution, sign our petition.

Stop the breeders’ persecution of Milo and Mina and all other wolves!

Stop the breeders’ persecution of Milo and Mina and all other wolves!
27.05.2025
Corrèze
Stop the breeders’ persecution of Milo and Mina and all other wolves!
Wildlife

At the slightest attack, breeders call for wolves to be slaughtered. Milo and Mina are bearing the cost of this policy on the Millevaches plateau. Some farmers’ unions demonstrated on Saturday to call for their deaths. Everyone is in cahoots to wipe them out, and everyone – public decision-makers included – is making statements, each more nauseating than the last.

Hostility towards Milo and Mina is on the rise…

The very special wolf couple continue to be shot at on the Millevaches plateau. As soon as last Thursday’s attack was announced, the farming unions were already unleashing their torrent of hatred into the public arena.

Gathered last Saturday in Saint-Merd-les-Oussines, the farmers are calling for the wolf brigade to be sent on site, and for reinforced defense shooting to be authorized. They denounce the inaction of public authorities. Inaction, really? While the government representatives are literally lending them an attentive ear…

All wolves are already disliked in France. They’re a good excuse to get the votes of the farming world, as shown by the abject proposal for a resolution by deputies to reduce their population by half.

But farmers still want more, and will not stop until their wish is granted: the eradication of these wild canids, which are intrinsically European.

… and a lobby making more and more slanderous statements

It’s almost funny: Fabien Marcilloux, president of Modef Corrèze, says: “Our thoughts are mainly with the game. We’re here again today for the massacre of a herd.” What is he referring to? The wild animals that the hunters put to death one after the other, or those in his care before they are taken to the slaughterhouse? Either way, these words speak volumes about his feelings towards animals. It’s hardly surprising that he should attack wolves, despite the fact that 8 out of 10 French people consider their return to be a real boon for biodiversity (Ipsos/One Voice poll, November 2024).

According to Corrèze Senator Daniel Chasseing: “Wolves are not compatible with livestock farming. And when there are too many of them, it’s impossible to continue farming.” Prefect Vincent Berton, for his part, is true to the characteristic cowardice that seems to be the hallmark of government representatives: “We’re going to have to adapt. But the wolf is a protected species. I don’t think we have to learn to live with the wolf. You have to be able to protect yourselves from it.”

Don’t they mean to say that it’s livestock farming and intensive pastoralism that are incompatible with wild animals and that trample on their territory? They’re at home here, and as much a part of nature as we are. Wolves have the right to live. Let’s prevent their extermination!

And yet: as in Saône-et-Loire, where Camille is already being hunted down, the prefect has also called in the wolf brigade in June: Milo and Mina’s days are numbered… We’ll fight to the bitter end for them. Join our fight by signing our petition to end the persecution of wolves.

Wolves: in the Saône-et-Loire region, let’s save Camille, threatened with imminent slaughter

Wolves: in the Saône-et-Loire region, let’s save Camille, threatened with imminent slaughter
19.05.2025
Saône-et-Loire Wolves: in the Saône-et-Loire region, let’s save Camille, threatened with imminent slaughter
Wildlife

Wolves are being exterminated one by one in the Saône-et-Loire region, and Camille, the latest arrival, is no exception. The lieutenants of louveterie and pests, under the orders of the prefect, have already been after him since Thursday evening (15/05/2025). He was even the target of a shot. The Prefecture and the Ministry are always quick to slaughter a single wolf and destroy all the biodiversity he is responsible for, as long as they can satisfy hunters and certain breeders.

Photo: OFB

In the Saône-et-Loire region, the only response to the arrival of wolves on the territory is lethal shooting. The State has opted for systematic death, and these wild cousins of dogs have been shot one after the other, in 2020, 2021 and 2023.

Barely arrived, already hunted down

When Camille’s presence in the village of Morey was confirmed, hateful reactions abounded: the FDSEA and Jeunes Agriculteurs 71, true to form, called for the kill in an open letter.

As usual, the Prefect bowed to the wishes of the breeders, who have always refused to protect their herds destined for the slaughterhouse. He facilitated the shootings, without in any way requiring the implementation of protective measures.

Camille has therefore become prey since last Thursday. “The wolf was shot on Thursday evening, but missed,” said the prefect, much to his dismay.

The prefect is rubbing his hands, however, as he has summoned the OFB’s national brigade to get the wolf. A veritable hunt is underway. Financed by taxpayers.

Only one solution: cohabitation

It’s inconceivable to hate nature so much. It’s obvious that the successive culling of every wolf in the Saône-et-Loire region has done nothing to reduce the number of attacks. Every time a wolf is killed, another one takes their place. It’s time to stop constantly playing the fear card and refusing to question the situation. It’s high time for the State to assume its responsibilities and encourage farmers to assume theirs. Muriel ARNAL President of One Voice

Electrified pens, guard dogs and human presence: these are the solutions for “protecting” animals. Contrary to what the French Minister of Agriculture claims, there are other solutions than culling, which proves cruel and ineffective every time.

Why always kill rather than live together? 7 out of 10 French people (Ipsos/One Voice poll, November 2024) think that it is unacceptable for the State to slaughter animals from protected species for the simple reason that they may represent a risk to livestock farming, and 81% consider that the return of wolves to France represents a real benefit for biodiversity.

Another path is possible, as in Mexico or Abruzzo.

For all the wolves in France, we are present wherever they are in danger, as for Milo and Mina, but also before the courts where we are challenging the decrees administering their death. To put an end to their persecution, sign our petition!

After isolation and suffering at Marineland, Fox was sent to endless exploitation

After isolation and suffering at Marineland, Fox was sent to endless exploitation
16.05.2025
Antibes
After isolation and suffering at Marineland, Fox was sent to endless exploitation
Exploitation for shows

In November 2024, two seals and four sea lions were shipped from Antibes to the Madrid zoo, where their exploitation has resumed. While Marineland continues to dispose of the animals that made its fortune, many are still languishing in the French park’s pools. Such was the case with Fox, the Steller sea lion whose stereotypical behavior is clearly visible in our images, until his departure on May 8. Pierre Gallego, a veterinarian specializing in marine biology and consultant for One Voice, gives us his analysis.

On April 24, at the Antibes dolphinarium, Wikie and Keijo, but also the dolphins, are still locked up. Among them, we witnessed the distress of Fox, a large male weighing almost a ton. Arrived in Antibes in 2013, the Steller sea lion shared his tank with two of his congeners: Boris and Laska. For the past few months, he had been vegetating there alone, amidst algae accumulating on the floor and fragments floating on the surface. In our images, we see him in full stereotypy, swimming slowly in a circle, taking the same path over and over again, passive and indifferent to his surroundings. How could it be otherwise when there’s no enrichment to be found in this aquatic prison? The only “entertainment” added is a vulgar jet of water. It would be laughable if the situation weren’t so dramatic.

Appalling conditions of confinement

Even when Fox might have hoped to be distracted from his miserable existence at feeding time, this was not the case. 1 minute and 24 seconds: that’s how long the keeper spent with him when feeding him. Not a second longer, and certainly not for any interaction with him. Once he’d had his pittance, Fox was back to his solitary confinement… and his pool laps.

The conditions in which this Steller sea lion is kept are largely inadequate, insufficient, and cause him psychological suffering that is intolerable in a 21st century European institution. The lack of involvement of the keepers, as well as the absence of a permanent veterinarian, only amplify my professional concerns. Dr Pierre Gallego veterinary consultant for One Voice

Dr. Pierre Gallego has studied our images. For this veterinarian specializing in marine biology, there’s no doubt: Fox’s attitude is “a typical example of stereotyped behavior, stemming from profound boredom”. To put it bluntly: none of what is going on is okay.

Our consultant denounces in turns the ridiculous size of the pool, its lack of maintenance, the total absence of behavioral enrichment and the imposed isolation. It’s hard to imagine the pain and loneliness felt by this gregarious animal, which should have been living surrounded by other sea lions, napping on rocks, pressed up against his companions, or diving to a depth of a hundred meters. In captivity, this life – any life worthy of the name – is impossible. And the dolphinarium has done nothing to alleviate this ordeal… nothing other than to discard Fox after enriching itself on his back for over 10 years.

For Fox, as for the animals still kept at Marineland, the French government has wilfully failed to anticipate the park’s closure, abandoning the captives to their fate. We will continue to speak out on their behalf. Sign our petitions to demand an end to dolphinariums, and a sanctuary for Wikie and Keijo.