News Archive - Page 3 of 150

Jumbo: Press release

Jumbo: Press release
31.03.2026
France
Jumbo: Press release
Exploitation for shows

One Voice is stunned by the statements made yesterday on X by Mathieu Lefèvre, Minister of State at the Ministry for Ecological Transition, claiming that the health of the hippopotamus Jumbo “is not cause for alarm”.
These remarks, based on veterinary reports commissioned by the administration, are in flagrant contradiction with the evidence we possess and which we have brought to the attention of the authorities.
Inaccurate and opaque administrative reports

The first report, issued by the Lot-et-Garonne prefectural authorities in early February 2026, has never been made public despite our repeated requests, raising legitimate questions about transparency. The second report – this time from the Gironde prefectural authorities later in February, which we were able to consult – raises serious questions regarding its rigour: drawn up following a 90-minute visit, it relies heavily on statements from the owner of the Zavatta circus, without essential on-site checks being carried out.

Numerous crucial points were not examined: no consultation of the medical records nor any assessment of the actual living conditions (temperature, water quality in the container where Jumbo bathes, dimensions of the facilities, etc.). Worse still, certain observations directly contradict the findings made by our own veterinary experts in 2024 and January 2026.

Unfit and dangerous conditions of captivity

Our investigations are unequivocal: Jumbo suffers from severe obesity, significant joint pain and a rapid deterioration of his health. The symptoms observed in early 2026 indicate a significant worsening of his locomotor problems.

Contrary to official claims, Jumbo’s situation is catastrophic. This hippopotamus, a semi-aquatic and gregarious animal that spends up to 16 hours in water and travels dozens of kilometres each night, has been kept alone for nearly 40 years, in conditions incompatible with its fundamental biological needs: lack of sufficient access to a suitable pool, prolonged confinement—sometimes for days on end in a trailer—and exploitation in shows.

Our teams recently observed this during the setting up of the Muller Circus in Lormont (33) in recent weeks. Jumbo was kept locked up for two weeks without access to his “pool”. He is also forced to take part in performances, now even carrying a person on his back, despite his worrying state of health.

Not to mention public safety, given that this animal—listed among Africa’s most dangerous—is separated from visitors at best by flimsy barriers, most often by a simple wire that is not always electrified and is regularly crossed by spectators.

Convictions, and yet impunity

The Muller family, who set up illegal installations wherever they go, are no strangers to legal disputes.

Alexandre Muller has already been convicted on multiple occasions for contempt of court, death threats and violence against public officials, resisting arrest and obstructing traffic. Edmond Muller has been convicted of physical and psychological abuse committed against animal rights activists who were demonstrating peacefully and lawfully.

But above all, both were convicted by the Criminal Court of Valence in 2020 for “unlawful operation of an establishment housing non-domestic animals; placing or keeping an animal in an environment causing suffering; and using an unsuitable method of confinement likely to cause suffering or injury.”

These facts directly concern the living conditions imposed on Jumbo in the circus. The worst part? The seizure of the hippopotamus had been ordered prior to the hearing. It failed in the face of violence from the circus staff. And the State and the Courts gave in, leaving Jumbo in their care even after the conviction.

Let’s put a stop to these outdated practices!

Beyond Jumbo’s case, this situation highlights the persistent abuses linked to the captivity of wild animals in circuses. Even as a ban is announced, no concrete solution is currently guaranteed to ensure the transfer of these animals to suitable facilities.

With the Muller Circus due to arrive in Mérignac in the coming days, One Voice calls on:

the authorities to demonstrate transparency and to commission an independent and comprehensive assessment;

local authorities to refuse to allow circuses that exploit wild animals to set up;

the public to no longer condone these outdated practices.

Jumbo is the symbol of a silent suffering that we can no longer ignore.

Jumbo is not a number. He is not an attraction. If he dies in his trailer after enduring continuous pain so intense it is impossible to describe, those responsible will be held to account. We will secure justice for him. But there is still time to get him out of there. One Voice is calling on the general public to sign its petition.

2,041,157 animals used in experiments in 2024: France seems frozen in inertia

2,041,157 animals used in experiments in 2024: France seems frozen in inertia
27.03.2026
France
2,041,157 animals used in experiments in 2024: France seems frozen in inertia
Animal testing

For more than ten years, the figure of 2 million animals used in experiments in French laboratories has not fallen: it has become the norm. Whilst since 2021 – five years ago now – the European Union has been urging its member states to phase out animal experimentation, France is not slowing down. It is stagnating. And becoming bogged down in a statu quo which increasingly looks like a deliberate choice.

The raw figures seem abstract. They say nothing of the bodies subjected to constraint, the repeated procedures, the sample takings, the confinement, the constant stress. They say nothing of the lives cut short, yet they sum up a reality: every day in France, 3,785 animals are used in laboratories. More than 150 per hour. More than two per minute.

The industrialisation of suffering

One of the most striking developments of 2024 is the explosion of the number of genetically modified animals: over a million, 1,022,805 to be precise. These living beings are thus engineered to develop diseases or exhibit specific characteristics to meet experimental protocols. Put simply: manufactured to be used and then disposed of. If they appear in the statistics today, it is because of a European framework that finally requires the reporting of tail, finger or limb amputations, despite these being classified as ‘minor’ procedures.

The most exploited species

With 1,477,726 individuals, mice remain by far the most commonly used animals. They are also the most affected by severe procedures and genetic modifications (962,602). If they do not die from induced tumours, they are killed at the end of the experiments.
Of the 160,573 rabbits used in experiments in 2024, the overwhelming majority (154,663) were ‘used’ in so-called ‘routine production’ tests, a phrase that trivialises the reality endured, as it refers to animals bred to provide their blood, antibodies or bodily fluids. At the end of these procedures, 99.2% of them were killed. The remaining 1,284 fared no better: reduced to the status of resources, they were reused, shuttled through protocols like products, reused until exhaustion. After 2024, they will no longer be undergoing pyrogenic tests: Europe has banned these after long campaigns by our European coalitions. We will now ensure that this ban is actively enforced in the future.
But these animals are not the only victims of experimentation: our most familiar companions are not spared either. There were 574 cats and 3,342 dogs in the statistics. The vast majority of the latter come from breeding facilities such as those in Gannat and Mézilles, run by the American group Marshall BioResources, because France welcomes these companies with open arms.
In August 2024, 160 cats and 140 dogs were used to ‘train staff’ and teach them how to kill… Meanwhile, there is no ‘waste’: sample taking and injections are on the agenda. The aim? To dehumanise the experimenters as early as possible whilst daring to speak of ‘animal welfare’.

Fewer severe procedures: a smokescreen

At first glance, one indicator might seem encouraging. So-called ‘severe’ procedures are falling (from 191,046 in 2023 to 159,744 in 2024) and the total for ‘severe + moderate’ has dropped below the one-million mark.

But on closer inspection, the picture darkens: so-called “minor” experiments are skyrocketing and exceeded one million in 2024 (1,079,955). Their number has doubled in just a few years, and mice are paying the highest price (821,876).

The explanations put forward to justify these results – a ‘stricter’ framework and ‘increased pressure’ to reduce the number of animals – do not stand up to scrutiny. Reducing the number of animals is not a matter of pressure: it is an obligation enshrined in European policy. It is also a strong expectation among the French public.

Furthermore, One Voice has scrutinised the projects of laboratories conducting animal experiments that same year: around sixty reveal blatant cases of downplaying the suffering. For some laboratories, the stakes are clear: avoiding the ‘severe’ category allows them to reuse the animals and avoids retrospective assessments that could demonstrate the futility of this suffering. It is a logic of budgetary optimisation where pain and death are merely adjustment variables.

France clings to practices that a growing number of countries are abandoning. Today it remains the last country in the European Union to use the method of ascites to produce antibodies, in spite of it being widely criticised for its cruelty, and despite the existence of alternatives. In 2024, 24,090 instances were recorded, of which 24,043 were classified as severe procedures.

Faced with these figures, the authorities can no longer look the other way.

One Voice calls for an end to this absurd logic. Moving away from animal experimentation is not an utopian dream; it is a matter of political will, already underway among our European neighbours. On behalf of the animals victimised by laboratories, sign our petition.

2,041,157 animals used in experiments in 2024: France seems frozen in inertia

In 2024, 2,041,157 animals were used in laboratories in France, a figure almost identical to that of 2023 (2,046,754)

Les espèces les plus exploitées

Avec 1 477 726 individus, les souris restent de loin les animaux les plus utilisés. Elles sont aussi les plus touchées par les procédures sévères et les modifications génétiques (962 602). Si elles ne meurent pas des suites de tumeurs induites, elles sont mises à mort à l’issue des expériences.
Sur les 160 573 lapins expérimentés en 2024, l’écrasante majorité (154 663) a
« servi » à des tests dits de « production de routine » : une formule qui banalise la réalité endurée puisque l’on parle d’animaux élevés pour fournir leur sang, leurs anticorps ou leurs fluides. À l’issue de ces procédures, 99,2% d’entre eux ont été tués. Les 1 284 restants ne furent pas mieux lotis: réduits à l’état de ressources, ils ont été réutilisés, enchaînant les protocoles comme des produits, réutilisés, jusqu’à épuisement. Après 2024, ils ne subiront plus de tests pyrogènes : l’Europe les a interdits après de longs combats de nos coalitions européennes. À présent, nous veillerons à ce que cette interdiction soit activement appliquée à l’avenir.
Mais ces animaux ne sont pas les seules victimes de l’expérimentation: nos compagnons parmi les plus familiers ne sont pas épargnés. Les chats ont été 574 et les chiens, 3 342. Une grande majorité de ces derniers proviennent d’élevages comme ceux de Gannat et Mézilles, gérés par le groupe américain Marshall BioResources, car la France accueille ces entreprises les bras ouverts.
En août 2024, 160 chats et 140 chiens ont servi à « former le personnel » et à l’entraîner à donner la mort… Entre-temps, pas de « gaspillage »: prélèvements et injections sont au programme. L’objectif ? Déshumaniser au plus tôt les expérimentateurs tout en osant parler de « bien-être animal ».

Les procédures sévères en baisse : un écran de fumée

À première vue, un indicateur pourrait sembler encourageant. Les procédures dites « sévères » reculent (de 191 046 en 2023 à 159 744 en 2024) et le total « sévère + modéré » passe sous le seuil du million.
Mais à y regarder de plus près, le constat s’assombrit : les expériences dites « légères » explosent et dépassent le million en 2024 (1 079 955). Leur nombre a doublé en quelques années et les souris en paient le prix fort (821 876).
Les explications avancées pour justifier ces résultats, un cadre « plus exigeant », une « pression accrue » pour réduire le nombre d’animaux, ne résistent pas à l’analyse. Réduire le nombre d’animaux n’a rien d’une pression : il s’agit d’une obligation inscrite dans la stratégie européenne. C’est aussi une attente forte des Français et Françaises.

Par ailleurs, One Voice a passé au crible les projets de laboratoires expérimentant sur les animaux cette même année : une soixantaine révèlent des cas flagrants de minimisation des souffrances. Pour certains laboratoires, l’enjeu est clair : éviter la catégorie « sévère » permet de réutiliser les animaux et évite des bilans rétrospectifs qui pourraient démontrer l’inutilité de ces souffrances.. Une logique d’optimisation budgétaire où la douleur et la mort ne sont que des variables d’ajustement.

La France s’accroche à des pratiques qu’un nombre croissant de pays abandonne. Elle reste aujourd’hui le dernier pays de l’Union européenne à recourir à la méthode de l’ascite pour produire des anticorps, pourtant largement décriée pour sa cruauté malgré l’existence d’alternatives. En 2024, 24 090 utilisations ont été recensées, dont 24 043 classées en procédure sévère.

Face à ces chiffres, les autorités ne peuvent plus détourner le regard.

One Voice appelle à rompre cette logique aberrante. Sortir de l’expérimentation animale n’est pas une utopie, c’est une volonté politique, déjà engagée chez nos voisins européens. Au nom des animaux victimes des laboratoires, signez notre pétition.

In Varennes-Vauzelles, the Nièvre region’s first Chatipi is improving coexistence between humans and cats

In Varennes-Vauzelles, the Nièvre region’s first Chatipi is improving coexistence between humans and cats
12.03.2026
Varennes-Vauzelles
In Varennes-Vauzelles, the Nièvre region’s first Chatipi is improving coexistence between humans and cats
Domestic animals

Located within the grounds of the Pignelin care home in Varennes-Vauzelles near Nevers, the Nièvre region’s first Chatipi will be officially opened on 26 March. This community project has helped resolve tensions caused by stray cats whilst improving their welfare and fostering new bonds with residents.

The opening ceremony will take place on Thursday 26 March at 2pm, attended by Véronique Coureau, chair of the local charity Les P’tits Félins de Pignelin, Morgane Tillier, healthcare manager at the Pignelin care home, Cyrille Cantin, building and electrical manager, Paul Rosette, logistics manager for the Nevers Urban Area Hospital Centre (CHAN), and Mathilde Perrot from the association One Voice.

A community project born out of a conflict situation

A community project born out of a conflict situation

Before the launch of the project, the presence of unneutered cats within the care home grounds had become a source of significant tension: uncontrolled breeding, disturbances in the outdoor areas and animal suffering were fuelling a heated controversy.

Faced with this situation, the care home management had decided to ban the feeding of cats to discourage them from approaching the buildings. Alerted by staff and volunteers concerned about animal welfare, One Voice then contacted the Nevers Urban Area Hospital to propose a practical alternative: the implementation of a Chatipi project.

Chatipi, a practical facility for the protection of cats

Chatipi is an educational project taking the form of a small, specially fitted chalet that provides shelter for cats whilst organising their feeding and health monitoring. Combined with neutering and awareness-raising initiatives around feline straying, it helps stabilise populations and informs the public about the importance of having cats neutered.

As part of this project, One Voice covered the costs of fifteen neutering procedures, microchipping and tests for major feline diseases, as well as the purchase of the chalet, cat flaps, an information board and 30 kilos of dry food.

The Nevers Urban Area Hospital Trust constructed the concrete slab on which the facility stands and will be responsible for the maintenance and any future repairs to the equipment.

The association Les P’tits Félins de Pignelin, set up specifically for this project, assembled and fitted out the chalet. It now feeds the cats, monitors their health, traps them if necessary, buys the food and maintains the chalet. It also covers the long-term veterinary costs for the residents of the Chatipi.

Positive effects for the cats… and for the residents

Since the facility was set up, the situation has changed dramatically. Tensions have eased, and the cats, now neutered and monitored, are in better health and much calmer.

The project has also allowed the residents to enjoy precious moments. One lady comes down every afternoon to feed the cats dry food.She has a special bond with ‘Titi’, the oldest of the group, whom she has known since he was a kitten. Another resident regularly saves a little of his leftovers to share with the cats.

Another resident has knitted a blanket for the cats, thereby regaining some mobility in her hands.

In the long term, therapeutic projects centred on the presence of the animals could also be launched within the care home.

Practical information

The opening of the first Chatipi in the Nièvre region will take place on Thursday 26 March at 2pm, at the Chatipi located within the grounds of the Pignelin care home, 5, route de la Guesse, 58640 Varennes-Vauzelles.

In Varennes-Vauzelles, the Nièvre region’s first Chatipi is improving coexistence between humans and cats

The Nièvre region’s first Chatipi will be inaugurated on 26 March at the Pignelin care home, promoting peaceful coexistence between residents and free-roaming cats.

Hunting: three more deaths and injured walkers

Hunting: three more deaths and injured walkers
19.03.2026
France
Chasse : encore trois morts et des promeneurs blessés
Wildlife

Between 30 November 2025 and 7 March 2026, there were at least two hunting-related incidents every week! Three hunters lost their lives whilst engaging in this cruel and deadly pastime, and two joggers were hit by stray bullets. Every season, the same arguments are put forward: hunting is a tradition, a rural pastime, a regulated activity. Yet the facts tell a very different story. One Voice is fighting for radical reform of this practice, which adds numerous collateral victims to the 45 million animals killed each year.

Between late November 2025 and early March 2026, accidents multiplied in France, serving as a reminder that hunting is not only dangerous for the animals it targets, but also for humans who do not take part in it.

Two joggers injured by stray bullets

On 30 November 2025, in Plémet (Côtes-d’Armor), a bullet fired during a drive hunt passed through the window of a house and came to rest in a built-in oven. A tragedy was narrowly averted: the kitchen was empty at the time of impact.

A few weeks later, the danger struck a walker directly. In Vaison-la-Romaine, a 25-year-old jogger was seriously injured by a hunter who claimed to have mistaken him for wild boar. The bullet shattered his knee, leaving him with permanent disability.

Unfortunately, such incidents are far from rare. Hunting accidents occur every year and affect people who have absolutely no connection to the pursuit.

In forests, on public paths, and even at home, anyone can find themselves in the line of fire. In Bormes-les-Mimosas, two mushroom pickers found themselves caught in the middle of a driven hunt and had to throw themselves to the ground and cry out to avoid being targeted.

In the Jura region, a jogger was shot in the foot. On a road in the Aisne region, a wedding procession was halted by a hound hunt, with shots ringing out just a few metres from the guests.

Three hunters victims of their own practices; animals hunted and killed

Whilst the violence of hunting affects humans, dogs also pay a heavy price. Wild boar drives regularly result in animals being seriously injured or killed. In the Landes region, eight dogs were injured during a hunt. In the Vendée region, two died and five others were maimed.

Not to mention our pets, all too often caught in the trap of these armed hunts: in the Haute-Saône region, a cat at a château was killed by hunting dogs that had entered private property.

And the wildlife is subjected to scenes of a brutality rarely shown. In February 2026, a stag chased by dogs ended up on a motorway (with all the risks that entails for motorists) after being bitten on the legs, before being shot dead.

A deadly season

During the 2024/2025 season, the French Office for Biodiversity (OFB) recorded 11 fatal accidents involving hunters, compared with six in the two previous seasons. The winter of 2025–2026 was marked by a series of incidents: accidental shots to the hands or legs, ricocheting bullets, falls from hunting hides, and hunters injured by their own weapons. In the Somme, a man was shot dead during a driven hunt, whilst another was seriously injured on the same day.

In the Eure region, a hunter died after tripping over barbed wire whilst carrying a loaded rifle. In the Charente region, another drowned after falling into a river. These tragedies come on top of the numerous incidents already recorded at the start of the season, and these numbers are based solely on our press review: it is likely that many other accidents have gone unrecorded.

Hunting: a risk to everyone

These events are not isolated accidents. They are the logical consequence of a system that permits the use of firearms in public spaces frequented by everyone: paths, forests, roads and inhabited countryside.

The question is therefore no longer whether such tragedies can happen, but how much longer our society will accept that an armed leisure activity poses such a risk to the public and inflicts such violence on animals.

Join our campaign and sign our petition for a radical reform of hunting!

Hunting: three more deaths and injured walkers

41 accidents in three months, 3 deaths. Walkers and joggers remain the collateral victims of hunting.

Trial of a member of the hunting community in the Var region: Press Release

Trial of a member of the hunting community in the Var region: Press Release
18.03.2026
Gap
Trial of a member of the hunting community in the Var region: Press Release
Domestic animals

Poaching, death of a husky, illegal weapons…
One Voice will be present in Gap on 19 March for the trial of a member of the
Vars hunting society
Last December, a man who is a member of the Vars hunting society was taken
into custody for offences related to his hunting activities: undeclared weapons,
the remains of animals killed illegally, and the shooting of a husky named
Aramis. One Voice has joined the proceedings as a civil party in this case
which has been documented by the French Office for Biodiversity (OFB). We
will be present at the Magistrates’ Court in Gap on 19 March 2026 at 1.30 pm to
demand a verdict commensurate with the violence inflicted.

The case came to light during an investigation initially focusing on aggravated assault
committed between December 2023 and December 2025 by a member of the Vars
hunting society. But as investigators delved deeper into their inquiry, the list of
offences lengthened…
Animal remains kept as trophies
The defendant poached chamois and roe deer outside the hunting season or in
breach of established hunting plans. Searches led to the seizure of undeclared
weapons and a pick-up truck believed to have been used for poaching trips. The
investigations also uncovered a significant quantity of animal remains: preserved
chamois and deer heads, and chamois legs. All remains that should have been sent
for rendering.
Poaching is not a mistake, but a decision: the decision to shoot without regard for
seasons, quotas or the fragile balance of natural habitats. The decision to kill without
restraint.
Aramis, a dog treated as a target
Even more seriously: during one of these illegal outings, the suspect is alleged to
have shot a husky dog who was wearing a harness and answered to the name of
Aramis.
Violence linked to hunting does not stop at animals classified as ‘game’. It spills over.
It also affects walkers’ dogs, stray dogs and cats. Cows, donkeys, horses. Hunting
dogs themselves are not spared. All too often, they are treated as mere tools:
neglected, abandoned, kept in appalling conditions. One Voice has documented this
on numerous occasions: in the Ain, in Lot-et-Garonne and elsewhere. Aramis joins

this endless list. He serves as a reminder that, in the world of hunting, dogs too pay a
heavy price.
On 19 March 2026, animals will have voices to defend them
This case will be heard on 19 March 2026 at 1.30 pm before the Magistrates’ Court in
Gap. One Voice will be there. Because poaching is not just a minor offence: it is the
very negation of wildlife. It is deciding, alone, when an animal must die, without any
framework or limit.
Our organisation had already taken action during the hearing of the poachers in the
Cher region. Today, the same question remains: how many more animals must fall
before we admit that this violence is not marginal but indicative of a system in need of
a thorough overhaul?
Poaching and the shooting of dogs or other domestic animals are not isolated
incidents. They call for a radical reform of hunting. One Voice is calling on the general
public to sign its petition.
Trial of a member of the hunting community in the Var region: Press Release
Poaching, death of a husky, illegal weapons. One Voice will be present on 19 March
for the trial of a member of the Vars hunting society

Loro Parque: Press Release

Loro Parque: Press Release
17.03.2026
Antibes
Loro Parque: Press Release
Exploitation for shows

One Voice condemns France’s decision to take the easy way out by opting for the worst possible scenario for the orcas at Marineland rather than setting an example

Whilst the plan for a sanctuary in Nova Scotia seemed a done deal in December, One Voice has revealed a dramatic U-turn in recent weeks that condemns the last two captive orcas in France, Wikie and Keijo. Against public opinion and in complete contradiction with the spirit of the law of 2021, the French government is preparing to give its approval for their transfer to Loro Parque in the Canary Islands.

The situation for the orcas at Marineland is at an impasse. Worse still, the threat of being sent to Europe’s most abusive dolphinarium now hangs over Wikie and Keijo.

At a time when dolphinariums are closing across Europe, France very soon risks being singled out for its lack of foresight and its wait-and-see approach which have led to the current situation. A situation that cannot be attributed to the organisations that have been raising the alarm for many years and whose proposed alternatives are being dismissed one after the other.

The latest development: after announcing that it would prioritise the transfer of the two orcas from Marineland to the future marine sanctuary in Nova Scotia (Canada) – a project on which our association has been working for five years in collaboration with the Whale Sanctuary Project and the world’s leading specialists – the Ministry for Ecological Transition has been backtracking since mid-January. So much for the sanctuary for Wikie and Keijo. Between a rock and a hard place, the fate of Wikie and Keijo now hangs in the balance between a transfer to Loro Parque in the Canary Islands (Spain) or outright euthanasia – an argument used to put pressure on Spain which until now had considered the conditions at Loro Parque too poor to accommodate the orcas.

In this equation, animal welfare is overshadowed by financial interests. It also paves the way for commodification towards Asia.

Breeding and transfer to Japan: reading between the lines of the Loro Parque solution

Loro Parque is, in itself, a catastrophic prospect. There are already four orcas there, still subject to breeding and performances: a female and her one-year-old calf, Teno, in a pool separate from the two males. This raises the question of social interactions within a group with established hierarchies, involving orcas made aggressive by captivity, in a space that is too confined, falling short of the recommendations of the European Association of Aquatic Mammals (EAAM). Four orcas died there between 2021 and 2024 at ages ranging from 3 to 29, whereas the life expectancy of an orca in the wild exceeds 50 years.

The park has a facility capable of accommodating a maximum of six adult orcas, and it is almost certain, according to our sources, that its intention is to breed Wikie upon her arrival. This was already under discussion in 2025 during the previous attempt by Parques Reunidos, the owner of Marineland, to transfer the orcas to Loro Parque. The park had then stopped administering contraception to the orca before the Spanish government blocked their transfer.

This time, if the transfer is politically approved, Wikie will be used for breeding. Her son Keijo, meanwhile, could be sent to Japan and face an equally tragic fate. Asia is not about to close its dolphinariums. Faced with a shortage of orcas on the international ‘market’ and a genetic issue preventing the breeding of orcas already held in Asia, Keijo represents a multi-million-euro asset for these countries.

The links between Loro Parque and Japan are already strong. Officially, Teno was born in March 2025 to an unknown father. According to sources close to the case, his mother was likely inseminated, potentially by Earth, the last male orca in captivity in Japan, who died at the age of 16 last summer.

Orcas are social animals. In Japan, all orcas belong to Grandvista Hotel which owns two parks: Kamogawa and Kobe Suma Aqualife. A female orca on loan to Nagoya Park has been kept alone since Earth’s death for no apparent reason. That is unless Japan is expecting another father.

The hypocrisy of a move abroad

What message does the French government wish to send to the public? What is the value of the law of 2021 banning the captivity and breeding of cetaceans in France, if they are traded abroad to suffer an even worse fate?

One Voice refuses to stand by helplessly whilst this tragedy unfolds before our eyes and is calling for a Europe-wide consultation to offer all cetaceans still in captivity a sanctuary along our many coastlines or outside Europe. The proposed sanctuary in Nova Scotia remains a solid option, but it cannot move forward without guarantees that the orcas will be transferred there. The lack of a ministerial decision is currently blocking authorisations, investment and funding. We expect France to send a strong signal to the rest of the world, rather than becoming a symbol of failure.

Loro Parque: Press Release

One Voice condemns France’s decision to take the easy way out by opting for the worst possible scenario for the orcas at Marineland rather than setting an example

Alpes-de-Haute-Provence: Shooting wolves? The courts say no

Alpes-de-Haute-Provence: Shooting wolves? The courts say no
13.03.2026
Alpes-de-Haute-Provence Alpes-de-Haute-Provence: Shooting wolves? The courts say no
Wildlife

On 27 February 2026, following a request from One Voice, the Administrative Court in Marseille overturned six orders issued by the Prefecture of the Alpes-de-Haute-Provence region, authorising livestock farmers to shoot wolves. This victory comes just as the government has adopted legislation making it easier to shoot wolves. Faced with this setback, we are on high alert.

The court ruled that these orders were unlawful on two key points. Firstly, the prefecture claimed that cattle herds could not be protected, without providing any concrete evidence to support this. Yet this presumption does not hold water: each situation must be subject to an individualised technical and economic analysis before any shooting authorisation is granted. Secondly, it was incumbent upon the prefect to demonstrate that the farmer had indeed put protective measures in place. This was not the case.

Towards case law that protects wolves better

This verdict in favour of wolves is not an isolated case. It is in fact part of a body of case law built up over time: in 2024, the Administrative Court in Besançon had already struck down similar orders for the same reasons. In January 2026, it was the Court in Nice that overturned seven orders issued by the Prefecture of the Alpes-Maritimes region. Victory after victory, a legal precedent is taking shape: exemptions from wolf protection are not an automatic right. They must be earned and justified.

A real victory, but one erased by the government

This decision is good news for the wolves of the Alpes-de-Haute-Provence. But it comes just as the government’s announcements have come into force. Gone is the obligation to protect herds before being allowed to shoot. Gone is the prior assessment. Farmers will be able to open fire on the basis of a simple declaration, without having to prove anything. What the courts have just condemned — the lack of evidence and protection — is set to become the legal norm.

We have denounced this text, which marks an ethical, ecological and political step backwards, from the very beginning. All the more so as it sends a disastrous signal to those who view wolves not as beings essential to our ecosystems but as targets.

We will not give in!

Faced with this declaration of war, One Voice will not stand idly by. We are preparing our response.

Because the law can be a shield, provided we take hold of it. Because behind the legal proceedings, there are wolf families. Like Milo, Mina and their cubs in Corrèze, threatened by poaching and an illegal hunt organised by the local FDSEA, and narrowly saved thanks to an emergency mobilisation.

Six illegal orders overturned in Marseille, seven in Nice: the case law protecting wolves is advancing. But the government intends to erase it all. To ensure this victory is not the last, we must act now: sign the petition for wolves!

Stop the persecution of wolves!

Alpes-de-Haute-Provence: Shooting wolves? The courts say no

The courts have overturned six orders against wolves in the Alpes-de-Haute-Provence. A victory under threat from the government.

Stop à la persécution des loups ! Stop à la persécution des loups ! Stop à la persécution des loups ! Stop à la persécution des loups ! Stop à la persécution des loups ! Stop à la persécution des loups ! Stop à la persécution des loups ! Stop à la persécution des loups ! Stop à la persécution des loups ! Stop à la persécution des loups !

Court hearing in Gap: poaching and the death of Aramis brought before the courts

Court hearing in Gap: poaching and the death of Aramis brought before the courts
12.03.2026
Court hearing in Gap: poaching and the death of Aramis brought before the courts
Domestic animals

Last December, a man who is a member of the Vars hunting society was taken into custody for offences related to his hunting activities: undeclared weapons, the remains of animals killed illegally, and a husky named Aramis shot dead. One Voice has joined the proceedings as a civil party in this case which has been documented by the French Office for Biodiversity (OFB). We will be present at the District Court in Gap on 19 March 2026 at 1.30 pm to demand a verdict commensurate with the violence inflicted.

The case came to light during an investigation initially concerned with aggravated assault committed between December 2023 and December 2025 by a member of the Vars hunting society. But as investigators delved deeper into their inquiry, the list of offences grew longer…

Animal remains kept as trophies

The defendant poached chamois and roe deer outside the hunting season or in breach of established hunting plans. Searches led to the seizure of undeclared weapons and a pick-up truck believed to have been used for poaching trips. The investigations also uncovered a large quantity of animal remains: preserved chamois and deer heads, as well as chamois legs. All these remains should have been sent for rendering.

Is hunting not enough, then? For some, never, even if it means flouting the rules meant to regulate a practice that already has serious consequences for wild animals. Poaching is not a mistake, but a decision: the decision to shoot without regard for seasons, quotas or the fragile balance of natural habitats. The decision to kill without restraint.

Aramis, a dog treated as a target

Even more serious: during one of these illegal outings, the suspect is alleged to have shot a husky dog who was wearing a harness and went by the name of Aramis. What does he represent in this story? A presence deemed undesirable on a territory that some consider as their own?

Violence linked to hunting does not stop at animals classified as ‘game’. It spills over. It also affects walkers’ dogs, stray dogs and cats. Cows, donkeys, horses. Hunting dogs themselves are not spared. All too often, they are treated as mere tools: neglected, abandoned, kept in appalling conditions. We have documented this on numerous occasions: in Ain, in Lot-et-Garonne and elsewhere. Aramis joins this endless list. He serves as a reminder that, in the world of hunting, dogs too pay a heavy price.

On 19 March 2026, the animals will have voices to defend them

This case will be heard on 19 March 2026 at 1.30 pm before the Magistrate’s Court in Gap. One Voice will be there. Because poaching is not merely an offence: it is the very negation of wildlife. It is deciding on one’s own when an animal must die, without any framework or limits.

We had already taken action during the hearing of the poachers from the Cher region. Today, the same question arises: how many more animals must fall before we admit that this violence is not marginal but indicative of a system in need of a fundamental overhaul?

On 19 March 2026 at 1.30 pm, at the Magistrates’ Court in Gap, we will speak out on behalf of the chamois, the red deer, the roe deer and Aramis. Because behind every court case, there are lives shattered. Because poaching and the shooting of dogs or other domestic animals are not isolated incidents. They call for a radical reform of hunting. Let’s demand it: sign our petition.

Court hearing in Gap: poaching and the death of Aramis brought before the courts

Poaching, the death of a husky and illegal weapons: One Voice will be in Gap on 19 March to demand justice

Badgers dug up alive: you can say no

Badgers dug up alive: you can say no
10.03.2026
France
Badgers dug up alive: you can say no
Wildlife

Over the coming months, the prefectures will be proposing authorising additional periods for the underground hunting of badgers.

As part of these public consultations, everyone can have their say.

Let’s oppose this cruel and archaic practice.

As part of the public consultations, citizens can submit their comments and proposals electronically. It is essential that we participate in large numbers. For contributions to be properly taken into account, they must be well-reasoned.

Here are four arguments you can use, rephrasing and personalising them as you see fit:

A cruel practice

Underground hunting causes extreme suffering and distress to badgers: burrows are destroyed with shovels, pickaxes or crowbars; animals cornered by dogs are dragged out with metal grippers before being shot or killed with a knife, if they do not die beforehand from stress or dog bites. This practice is carried out solely for the hunters’ amusement.

A non-selective method

Badger burrows are often shared with other species, some of which are protected. Introducing dogs into the burrow tunnels can disturb, injure or kill animals that are not the intended target.

A timing that condemns the young badgers

The supplementary digging-out period takes place when the young are not yet independent. Furthermore, killing a female at this time almost always condemns her young to die in the burrow.

A practice contrary to the law

Article L. 424-10 of the Environmental Code prohibits the killing of mammalian young. The Administrative Court of Appeal in Bordeaux (24 February 2026, No. 24BX00637) recently clarified that a ‘young’ refers specifically to a young animal incapable of living independently without relying on its mother. Yet underground hunting during the supplementary period directly (or indirectly through the death of the mother) exposes young badgers to death.

A fight that remains necessary

Every year, our legal actions prove it: mobilisation is pushing back against barbarism. In 2025, twelve prefectural orders were suspended by the courts, sparing 1,000 badgers from the regions of Aisne through Eure to Haute-Vienne. Despite these advances, and despite the fact that 84% of French people say they are opposed to underground hunting (IPSOS/One Voice poll 2024), the hunting lobby continues to exert pressure.

One Voice remains fully committed and continues to use all available legal means to defend badgers and to speak out on their behalf in the face of hunters’ lies. Your civic engagement remains essential.

Badgers dug up alive: you can say no

Prefectures are set to launch public consultations to authorise the underground hunting of badgers. Oppose it!

Detergents: Europe says no to animal testing

Detergents: Europe says no to animal testing
10.03.2026
Europe
Detergents: Europe says no to animal testing
Animal testing

Victory! By amending the regulations on detergents for domestic and industrial use, the European Parliament has just taken a historic step. From now on, the use of animal testing is banned for the development of new products in Europe. This major breakthrough is the result of many years of campaigning. We have actively contributed to this alongside the European coalition Cruelty Free Europe, for which we are the representatives in France.

Challenging policy-makers, confronting manufacturers with the reality of their practices, informing the public… For many years, we have been campaigning to end animal testing whether for cosmetics or household products. In 2024 and 2025, One Voice conducted a wide-ranging survey of manufacturers. It highlighted the vague responses and the embarrassment of many industry giants. We have also documented the suffering of the animals used in these experiments, particularly that of rabbits who are the most commonly used animals in tests involving cleaning products.

As part of the European coalition Cruelty Free Europe, One Voice has actively contributed to this advocacy work. This breakthrough proves that animal exploitation is never inevitable.

What the new regulation changes

In practical terms, what does this new regulation entail, and how far does this ban actually go?

The amendments to Regulation (EC) No 648/2004 prohibit the use of animal testing for the production of detergents for domestic and industrial use.
The ban applies to both ingredients and finished products, ensuring that the development, innovation and regulation of new detergents can take place without resorting to animal testing.
This is the first ban on animal testing in European legislation since its abolition for cosmetics in 2013. These new rules will come into force three and a half years after their formal adoption, i.e. in July 2029.

Progress… and gaps

Despite these significant advances, gaps remain. The ban applies only to tests carried out “for the purposes of this Regulation”. In practice, certain molecules used in detergents may still be subject to animal testing under other regulations, such as REACH on chemical substances (paints, textile dyes, food additives, etc.).

Another limitation: unlike the situation for cosmetics, the text does not provide for a ban on the marketing of detergents that have been tested on animals outside the European Union.

A momentum that must still gather pace

There is still a long way to go since the European Union, through Directive 2010/63/EU, enacted the end of animal testing for all its Member States. An ambitious and necessary goal that we are monitoring closely with our European coalitions. Several European countries have already taken action by launching their national plans to end these practices on living beings. In 2023, the European Commission committed to drawing up a roadmap to phase out animal testing in chemical safety assessment. This document, expected in the first quarter of this year, must set out the steps to replace animal testing with modern and reliable scientific methods. It is a follow-up to the European Citizens’ Initiative “Save Cruelty-Free Cosmetics – Commit to a Europe Without Animal Testing”, launched in 2020 and signed by over 1.2 million citizens of the European Union.

This victory is essential, but it does not mean the fight is over. As long as a single animal can still be used to test our chemicals or medical treatments, we will continue to fight. The end of animal testing is no longer a utopian dream but a path we have embarked upon.

Europe must now set about ending animal testing without exception within its other regulations and encourage Member States that are still lagging behind, such as France. We will ensure this happens.

Detergents: Europe says no to animal testing

The European Parliament bans animal testing for detergents. A historic step forward