The state intended to protect sheep … who are no longer there!

The state intended to protect sheep … who are no longer there!

The state intended to protect sheep … who are no longer there!
24.11.2014
The state intended to protect sheep … who are no longer there!
Wildlife

In the context of anti-wolf hysteria, prefects believe they can do whatever they want under the pretext of calming farmers who will never be appeased, and are illegally authorising the shooting of wolves, a protected species. Three associations have just won their legal appeals against the State.

The justice system has once again proved ASPAS, Ferus and One Voice right by suspending two illegal orders for the shooting of wolves, this time in the Alpes-de-Haute-Provence. Our associations had attacked these decrees of the Prefect in 24 September which ordered the slaughter of four wolves, with the possibility of hunters being able to hunt them until 25 December in the communes of Allos, Thorame-Basse and Thorame-Haute, so say “protecting herds against predation” … while sheep are no longer on the pastures at this time of the year!

In its order of 20 November, the Marseille Administrative Court therefore considers that these two prefectural orders do not comply with the conditions set by the Ministerial Decree of 15 May 2013. “It is not sufficiently established, by the documents produced by the Prefect, that the herds remain exposed, during the entire period of execution of the decree, to the predation of the wolf […] “.

Let it be known, it is not allowed to slaughter wolves when the sheep have returned to the sheepfold in autumn! The official argument of the “protection of herds” no longer deceives anyone: a real wolf hunt is engaged by some Prefects, with so much zeal that they even forget the respect of the laws. Thirteen wolves have been killed since the end of August. Faced with this delirious policy, our associations appeal to the reason and responsibility of the representatives of the State. We will continue to fight orders considered illegal.

Shooting wolves out of the context of predation on herds is of no use to pastoralism. The Prefects are pretending to respond to the difficulties of the breeders by offering hunters the opportunity to shoot, even if it means putting a protected species at risk. Rather than digging into this trigger-happy policy, the public authorities would do better to really support the breeders in their necessary adaptation to the presence of wolves.

A call on Russia at the Olympics to put an end to animal fighting as done in the Middle Ages

A call on Russia at the Olympics to put an end to animal fighting as done in the Middle Ages

A call on Russia at the Olympics to put an end to animal fighting as done in the Middle Ages
07.11.2014
A call on Russia at the Olympics to put an end to animal fighting as done in the Middle Ages
Exploitation for shows

A new investigation reveals that in Russia, bears are captured, chained up and fed to dogs being tested for their hunting abilities.

One Voice and Baltic Animal Care are today launching an international campaign to reveal what wild animals used as living tools for assessing the abilities of hunting dogs in Russia are subjected to.

One Voice investigators focused on Russia’s national symbol, the brown bear, which will also be one of the symbols of the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi. They visited four hunting dog training centres in four different regions of Russia. There they discovered seven bears and the worst cases of animal suffering they have encountered since they began their work several decades ago.

They filmed bears in chains, as well as badgers and wild boars locked up, chased and attacked by Laikas, a Russian breed of hunting dogs. They met the judges who presided over the trials and graded the dogs according to old rules, based in particular on tracking, barking, aggression and courage. In these trials, aggression is rewarded. In a test on a bear, for example, the dog will get a good score if it bites the bear deeply in the hocks, heels or hindquarters, but it will lose points if it retreats or does not bite hard enough.

Our investigators are haunted by what they saw. At a competition they attended, the bear was attacked and bitten by dogs all day long, then remained chained to a pulley overnight, ready to be used again the next day. At another centre, two cubs shared a cage measuring approximately 5 x 3 x 2.5 metres. They were in a pitiful state. They were covered in a thick layer of mud and excrement, as was the floor of their cage. This is a terrible fate for these animals, which are among the most intelligent mammals and renowned for being great travellers and extraordinary explorers. Muriel Arnal President of One Voice Tests using a bear involve chaining it to a pulley system, which operates using a cable stretched between two trees. An employee stands on each side to pull or push the bear. Specialised judges observe and evaluate the performance of the dogs, which must attack and corner the bear. Elena Bobrova Baltic Animal Care

Each time the dog fails to meet an established criterion, points are deducted from a maximum possible score of 100. For example, if its bites are not strong enough, the dog will lose up to 8 points; if it barks but does not bite the bear, it will lose 10 points; and if it moves away from the bear instead of biting it, it will lose between 10 and 15 points.

Given that a ‘test’ normally lasts ten minutes and that several dogs are assessed each day, the same wild animal can be used as a target multiple times.

The price to pay for causing a wild animal to suffer in this way is not high. One Voice investigators noted that a ten-minute test cost between 200 and 400 roubles, or approximately £2 to £4.

In Russia, these activities are referred to as ‘trials’ or ‘field tests’. They are officially supported by dog breeding associations and hunting clubs. According to available information, there are several dozen or even several hundred such training centres in Russia. They are advertised on public roads, in the press and on the Internet. Various wild species are used to train and test hunting dogs: badgers, bears, foxes, martens and raccoon dogs. These animals are usually captured in the wild, but One Voice investigators have discovered that bears are sometimes purchased from circuses or zoos. Various breeds of dogs take part, including Laikas, Borzois and Dachshunds.

Dogs that prove themselves can then participate in regional, inter-regional or national competitions, as well as international competitions. Dogs that do not perform satisfactorily may be refused their pedigree. For Laikas, for example, obtaining a pedigree requires passing several field trials, where they are confronted with different animals, including a captive bear.

The One Voice investigation revealed the total disregard that Russian hunting dog training centres have for nature and the needs of wild animals. They are thus completely out of step with the international community, which promotes knowledge and protection of wildlife and animal welfare.

One Voice and Baltic Animal Care are calling on the international public to take action by writing to President Putin and their country’s Russian ambassador to demand better protection for animals and a ban on the use of wild animals in hunting dog trials.

We hope that our new report and the videos we are publishing on the Internet will serve as a catalyst for the international campaign calling on Russia to stop using captive wild animals to train hunting dogs. There could be no greater contrast to the images of 21st-century cosmonauts carrying the Olympic torch, which the whole world will see today, than what can be seen in these Russian training centres. These scenes of dogs being set upon wild animals, worthy of the Middle Ages, should definitely be a thing of the past. Muriel Arnal President of One Voice

Notes:

1. The paper version of the report, as well as the English version, can be obtained on request by calling 02 51 83 18 10 or via the contact form.

2. Laikas – In Russian, the word ‘Laika’ is derived from the verb ‘layât’, which means to bark. Laikas are descended from indigenous dogs and have long been used as hunting and guard dogs. There are four recognised breeds in Russia: the Karelian-Finnish Laika, the Russian-European Laika, the West Siberian Laika and the East Siberian Laika. The latter three are among the breeds listed by the Fédération Cynologique Internationale (FCI). The Karelian-Finnish Laika is a close relative of the Finnish Spitz, and these two breeds were merged in 2006.

3. Animal protection legislation in Russia – the only animal protection referred to in this study is the limited protection against physical suffering granted to animals by the Criminal Code in Part 2, Section IX, Chapter 25, Article 245, which states: ‘Any act of cruelty towards an animal that has caused death or injury, if perpetrated with malice or for profit, or using sadistic methods, or in the presence of minors, shall be punished (…)’ At first glance, it would seem that this legislation could be applied to prevent the suffering of wild animals in hunting dog training centres. However, Elena Bobrova of Baltic Animal Care explains that attempts to enforce this legislation have failed, as the responsible authorities have deemed hunting dog training centres to be legal. New legislation is urgently needed to prevent wild animals from continuing to be captured and used to evaluate hunting dogs in Russia.

Following the drama of Lizy-sur-Ourcq, the challenges of the trial

Following the drama of Lizy-sur-Ourcq, the challenges of the trial

Following the drama of Lizy-sur-Ourcq, the challenges of the trial
23.06.2014
Following the drama of Lizy-sur-Ourcq, the challenges of the trial
Exploitation for shows

On 30 June, a trial will be held in Meaux following the escape of a circus elephant, which caused the death of a man on 8 September in Lizy-sur-Ourcq. One Voice hopes that the real issues at stake will be addressed.

What are these issues?

The first is to question the presence of elephants in circuses and its consequences for public safety. The tragedy in Lizy-sur-Ourcq sadly illustrates that travelling circuses with elephants cannot guarantee the safety of the public and residents of the towns that host them. How could they, when they are unable to meet the basic physical and psychological needs of animals endowed with extraordinary strength?

The results of the One Voice investigation conducted after the accident in Lizy-sur-Ourcq are damning, both in terms of the conditions in which the elephants are kept and in terms of public safety.

In support of this survey, the report for One Voice written in May 2014 by Dr John Knight on the situation of elephants in circuses and the increasingly deteriorating condition of Samba (whom he had already studied in 2005) speaks for itself. This eminent wildlife specialist points out, with material and scientific evidence to support his claims, the dramatic consequences for the health and behaviour of pachyderms kept in circuses and the safety and health risks for humans.

The second issue is ethical. How can we justify depriving a being with acute sensitivity and recognised intelligence of its freedom and most basic needs (walking, drinking at will, washing, eating a varied diet, having a social life)? Finally, how can we justify forcing it to perform tricks that go against its nature?

Dick Gregory, Martin Luther King’s fellow activist, said that animals in circuses reminded him of slavery because they represent the domination and oppression he fought so hard against. It is time for France, a leading country in human rights, to shake off its inertia and consider the unjust fate of these chained animals, the elephants in circuses! One Voice is open to dialogue with trainers to find solutions together to free these beings, in the interest of all, from a life of indignity that nothing can justify. Muriel Arnal President of One Voice

Companion animals: The better to know our companions the better to live with them

Companion animals: The better to know our companions the better to live with them

Companion animals: The better to know our companions the better to live with them
24.04.2014
Companion animals: The better to know our companions the better to live with them
Domestic animals

As part of the Zoé Unit, One Voice is launching the ‘Animal Companionship’ programme. It aims to provide keys to understanding the lifestyle and nature of the animals that live alongside us, thereby establishing knowledge as an antidote to mistreatment.

‘Animal Companionship’ will be launched on Saturday, 7 December 2013, during a conference on cats led by Dr Nathalie Simon, a veterinary behaviourist. It will take place at 2 p.m. at the Maison Municipale du Bénévolat, 10 boulevard Marx Dormoy, 19312 Brive La Gaillarde, in the presence of the team from the Brive SPA shelter, a local partner of One Voice. From abuse to abandonment, violence against pets often stems from a lack of knowledge.

Within the Zoé unit, which is already combating proven acts of cruelty in the field – several farms have recently been convicted – One Voice has developed an educational approach aimed at taking early action to prevent the emergence of unintentional but abusive behaviour towards animals.

‘Animal Companionship’ is a programme run in conjunction with shelters and associations that are partners of the Zoé unit. It will focus on cats in 2014 and dogs from 2015 onwards.

In order to reach as wide an audience as possible, One Voice has chosen two tools: the publication of information leaflets and the organisation of conferences/training sessions led by Nathalie Simon. The daily life with animals will be discussed with the aim of highlighting the most appropriate actions in relation to them. These conferences will leave plenty of room for interaction with the audience. Aimed at everyone, they are also intended as a practical tool for future adopters, association staff or anyone who comes into contact with animals.

Cats are amazing and misunderstood animals. With Compagnonnage animaux, the public will be able to discover the particularly subtle relationship that is possible with them. Based on mutual respect, it is entirely free of domination or possessiveness… Muriel Arnal President of One Voice The shelter is overflowing with animals traumatised by the humans who were responsible for them. This is all the more sad because the abuse they suffered was often based on misconceptions and a lack of curiosity. I am convinced that with a little relevant information, many tragic outcomes could be avoided. Bernadette Arnal President of the SPA in Brive