In Turin, macaques blinded by continuous mutilations

In Turin, macaques blinded by continuous mutilations

In Turin, macaques blinded by continuous mutilations
10.06.2019
Turin
In Turin, macaques blinded by continuous mutilations
Animal testing

Our Italian partner, the LAV, has just denounced the abominable mutilations reserved for macaques in a research laboratory at the University of Turin, which is conducting a study entitled « LIGHTUP-Making the brain in the blind cortex regain sight ». We need all of you to ask the Minister of Health, Giulia Grillo, to immediately revoke the authorization of this research project and allow these macaques to be released into an appropriate rehabilitation facility.

The Department of Psychology at the University of Turin has approved and even financially supports a program called « Lightup-Turning the cortically blind brain to see« , carried out in collaboration with the University of Parma where animals are locked up as well as Oxford and Hartelust in the Netherlands where they were purchased.

After long months, even years of terrible training, after cutting the skull to expose the brain or inserting rods to block the head from moving during the recording and stimulation sessions, the researchers will tackle « real » research. This study will therefore consist of subjecting macaques, initially in good physical shape, to numerous excruciatingly painful surgical procedures, the removal of parts of the brain in the area of the visual cortex, and even making them blind.

One Voice joins the call of LAV, its European partner, to ask the Italian Minister of Health to immediately revoke the authorization of this project, and allow the macaques to be placed in a rehabilitation centre in the shortest time possible.

Like its partners, One Voice calls for an end to animal testing. This practice has shown again and again that its results are insufficient to justify all the suffering it imposes on sentient beings, moreover primates. The European Union has demanded a drop in the number of animals tested, yet it is almost impossible in Italy or France to have access to reliable consolidated figures. This is unacceptable.

We must all sign urgently a petition before it is too late for them (in Italian) so that the mutilation of these macaques stops immediately. Science, like all human activity, cannot absolve itself from all things ethical.

Photo: Essere Animali

Ban hunting at home? A civic act!

Ban hunting at home? A civic act!

Ban hunting at home? A civic act!
06.06.2019
France
Ban hunting at home? A civic act!
Natural habitat

Your land, your conscience… In France, the uses and the law allow hunters to exercise their right to « leisure » on someone else’s property. The texts are complex, but you can act so that your property becomes a haven of peace for animals. How?

It’s a kind of anti-hunting extension of our Arches of Nature, which aims to reclaim our environment, for a richer and more varied biodiversity… One Voice wants to encourage every French landowner to make a sanctuary of their land, without having to endure hunters and their dogs who can freely pass through it to hunt down their victims.

A hunter hunting at your place…

Because the hunting lobby has nevertheless succeeded in an historic feat of having, in the name of the general interest accorded to their hunting activities, the right to relieve the owners of private land of the power to say no… Since 1964 and the Verdeille law, named after an ardent Senator from the Tarn and who is a hunter, France has enjoyed a special feature. This special feature is from the Communal Hunting Associations approved (or ACCA, which can be intercommunal, or AICA).

Aiming to establish important hunting areas, the Verdeille law obliges small landowners to bring to these associations certain hunting rights linked to their land so that third parties (hunters) can make use of it. The implementation of this law has been special: today it follows that some municipalities are under the ACCA (or AICA) regime, and others are not.

In the first case, hunters can hunt at your place without asking for your permission, but they are however obliged to respect a security perimeter of 150 m around the dwellings. In the second case (excluding ACCA), there is no security perimeter and the hunters will be able to shoot against your garden fence or, if there is no fence, cross it!

What scheme does your municipality depend on? The easiest way is to get information from your town hall.

Thank you, Europe!

You should know that this Verdeille law was modified following an action brought by owners before the European Court of Human Rights, who were successful. Since July 26th 2000, a non-hunter can thus withdraw his lands from an approved Communal Hunting Association subject to making an express request.

If your municipality is outside the Association Communale de Chasse Agréée (ACCA or AICA), you can very simply prohibit hunting at home by affixing, at the edge of the property, signs specifying that you do not accept the practice of hunting on your land.

If your municipality is in the ACCA, as soon as your land is fenced off in a “continuous and constant manner, preventing any communication with all neighbouring land and completely preventing the passage of game and that of man« , they are automatically excluded from hunting territory (Article L. 422-10 and L. 424-3 of the Environment Code).

Otherwise, you can also formulate a territorial opposition to the practice of hunting on your land if they is a minimum of 20 hectares in one area (3 ha in the case of marshes, 1 ha for a pond… but at least 100 ha in mountain areas above the limit of forest vegetation). You will then have to write to the prefect of your department (registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt), mentioning the cadastral references of all the parcels concerned (Articles L. 422-10 3 °, L. 422-13 and L. 422- 18 of the Environment Code).

No to hunting, a real conviction!

Fortunately, small landowners can also ban hunting in the name of their personal convictions (Art. L. 422-10 5 °, L. 422-14, L. 422-15 and L. 422-18 of the Code of the environment). But this is a real act of faith because it requires an important formalism.

Here you must send the Prefect of your department a registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt stating that you want your land to be prohibited from hunting due to your personal beliefs. Please note, this request must be made within a specific period (at least six months before the expiration of a period of five years from the date of creation of your ACCA. Your prefecture must inform you of this date upon request).

In addition to three copies of your request letter, in addition to the cadastral maps and plot numbers of the land concerned, it is recommended to attach copies of the letters that you wish to send to the local hunting society, the mayor and the services. ONCFS premises, to inform them of your decision. Let’s be civil…

Once the ACCA withdrawal is granted, you will be required to place « no hunting » signs along your property lines. Be careful, the law is tenacious: if you sell your property, the new owner will have to confirm within six months the withdrawal of the ACCA, otherwise the land will fall back into the rights to roam, in other words into the bosom of the hunters.

Nettles, the friend of butterflies

Nettles, the friend of butterflies

Nettles, the friend of butterflies
05.06.2019
France
Nettles, the friend of butterflies
Natural habitat

This plant covered with stinging hairs does not look like much and attacks those who underestimate her. Able to defend herself against brutes, she protects her virtues as much as her allies. You have to have the grace of a butterfly to know how to approach her, talk to her and take refuge in her.

She bites and she burns. However, one rarely declares her flames as a bouquet of flowers when she is in blossom, presenting herself mainly in the form of multi-coloured rows of clustering small pale flowers. A nettle (Urtica), whatever her species, she has no allies. Of the nettle family of Urticaceae, her hairy prickly leaves, are uninviting. We avoid her at the side of the roads, we curse her when we accidentally rub against her and the well-mowed lawn enthusiasts pull her out or kill her with pesticides. We don’t know her well enough.

Safe Haven

Because this very old herb has many properties. She has been used since time immemorial, both in food and medicine, in particular. A natural fertilizer, her liquid manure is also very beneficial to the rest of the vegetation. But the benefits of nettles are not limited to the exploitation of them by humans. Her mere presence on the banks of streams, at the edge of the fields, at the bottom of a vacant plot, represents a boon for the surrounding flora and fauna. While cleaning up polluted soils, she attracts a host of admirers, and in particular butterflies! Many have understood how this uninviting plant is an ideal refuge for sheltering from predators. And her mass turns out to be a small garden of Eden where the cunning lepidopterans come to fly with grace.

Nursery

In a group of colourful foragers, we can in particular admire the Vulcan, the Small Tortoiseshell, the Peacock Butterfly, the Comma, the Map or even the Beautiful Lady. Sometimes less flamboyant, the Owlet moths are not left out either: the Jersey Tiger, the Nettle moth, the Small Magpie, the Silver Y and the dark spectacle, are just a few of the many who regularly visit this « weed ». Many also put their offspring in her care. Depending on the species, each butterfly has its own technique. The Vulcan, for example, deposits its eggs one by one on the top of the leaves (the caterpillars later roll up the leaf to feed on from the inside out), while the Map prefers to lay its eggs underneath the leaves, in the form of cascading rosaries… which look like the inflorescences of the plant itself!

Winged poets in danger

Thus, nettles provide both food and shelter for a host of butterflies, whatever their stage of metamorphosis. When you know that these endangered insects are threatened with extinction, mainly due to the degradation of their natural environments, preserving their habitat is more essential than ever! Leaving a square area of nettles at the bottom of your garden is more than an easy gesture, it is an act of resistance against the decline of biodiversity! To fight alongside us and sanctify more and more green spaces, join the Arches of Nature!

No, Angora rabbits don’t like having their fur pulled out!

No, Angora rabbits don’t like having their fur pulled out!

No, Angora rabbits don’t like having their fur pulled out!
04.06.2019
France
No, Angora rabbits don’t like having their fur pulled out!
Fashion

Following its investigation into numerous angora rabbit farms in 2016 and images taken in 2018 showing that nothing has changed. One Voice attacked the Ministry of Agriculture and Food in front of the State Council for its implicit refusal to ban the practice of depilating angora rabbits. The hearing will take place in Paris on June 7th at 2 p.m.

« Combing » or « depilation » is a painful practice for rabbits, which is a gross understatement. This operation of hair removal is carried out while they are totally conscious, to pluck their entire body hair by handles, four times a year, for years to come. To do this, they are sometimes held motionless, squeezed between the farmer’s legs, sometimes tied to a board in painful, stretched out positions. The skin is often torn off along with the hair, especially around the eyes and genitals, where it is the thinnest and most fragile. The howls of the rabbits pierce the eardrums, who do not use their voice to communicate except in case of great danger.

Proof of this is in our 2016 undercover survey which was carried out involving several farms, and it was update in 2018 with images from a whistle-blower. Nothing had changed two years after the scandal was unearthed by One Voice and widely publicized.

The females used as reproducers, sexing at just a few weeks old, rabbits who die from the cold due to their fragility at low temperature, the fast which is imposed several days before the forced hair removal, all these « secondary » elements combine and go towards the sense of stopping this barbaric practice.

The association therefore challenged the Ministry of Agriculture and then made this appeal following its silence. The status quo is not acceptable for Angora rabbits.

At a time when a new farm is in danger of opening, subsidized by the Somme department and without a preliminary investigation, we protest against the fact that France persists in supporting such industries based on animal suffering. The French have expressed very clearly their desire to live in a society in which ecology is central, and where animals are respected. The government must take the measure of its decisions.

Muriel Arnal says: « Through our investigations, public awareness and procedures, we will continue to defend angora rabbits. They too have the right to something other than a miserable life of suffering and stress. »

The public judgment session of June 7th, 2019 will be held at 2 p.m. at the State Council in Paris, metro Palais Royal.

Elyo needs us more than ever!

Elyo needs us more than ever!

Elyo needs us more than ever!
03.06.2019
Mayenne
Elyo needs us more than ever!
Wildlife

Despite our many actions to defend the cause of Elyo, the circus people still hold him. So far, the authorities have remained deaf and blind to our repeated complaints and the great distress of this lion. We don’t give up and demand the High Court of Laval that the suffering of this animal on the verge of madness is finally recognized.

Seven steps in one direction, turn around, seven steps in the other and seven steps in another direction… This is the incessant ballet of Elyo, from one end to the other of his ridiculous cage. It’s this preoccupation of walking aimlessly around that kills time and which marks his desperate existence. The poor lion is still a hostage with these circus people. Since we began our efforts to free him, he has seen more than 365 additional days go by… Each minute, each second, are all like incessant blows upon him which kill him a little more.

Expert advice

We sought the advice of Donald Broom, a retired professor in the Department of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Cambridge. His glance at Elyo’s situation is clear. He denounces the cruelty of those who impose such an ordeal on him. For this world specialist in animal welfare, the beast obviously has an abnormal behaviour and his stereotypical movements are the blatant expression of his distress. He also points out that Elyo also spends a lot of time sitting around doing nothing. « He may be unconscious and listless during these times, which is another indicator of very poor living conditions. » Thus, languishing at the bottom of his cramped trailer, without the slightest social contact, inconsolable since the mysterious disappearance of his brother Chirkane, Elyo is on the brink. He rubs against the bars of his cage until the blood flows as others would do to open a vein to finish it all.

Immobilization of the authorities

The assessment by Donald Broom coincides with another report by a veterinarian mandated by the Public Prosecutor of Dunkirk at the time of our first complaint against the circus in April 2018. In his report, which we managed to obtain a copy of, he attests black and white that Elyo suffers from serious shortcomings in care and that he presents a marked malaise. Suffering from an immense distress and suffering. An observation as explicit and as alarming as this, should have moved the authorities! And yet, no… Not an inch! Worse still: the case has been closed! We are astonished by this obvious disregard for the suffering of an ill-treated lion, as much as by we are with that of the law, which is supposed to regulate the detention of circus animals! Will it silence us? On the contrary! We are more determined than ever to save this big cat from hell and have their rights recognized. This time, we have filed a complaint with the High court of Laval, the hearing will take place on June 7th at 9 a.m. And we will roar as hard as it takes to finally be heard!

We will be there on June 7th at 11am in front of the Prefecture of Mayenne, place Jean Moulin, please join us! Find the information on the Facebook page of the event. For Elyo, as well as all the other felines sequestered in circuses, please sign our petition!

Hunting: bullets will be whistling through the forest from June 1st!

Hunting: bullets will be whistling through the forest from June 1st!

Hunting: bullets will be whistling through the forest from June 1st!
30.05.2019
France
Hunting: bullets will be whistling through the forest from June 1st!
Wildlife

People generally believe that hunting is an autumn and winter activity, but hunters don’t see it that way. Hunters want to hunt as much as possible and for as long as possible. For a long time now, they have obtained the right to hunt deer as of June 1st! This is the period when there are the most people in natural and rural areas, but also when the deer are in the rutting season (mid-July to mid-August)! This makes hunting not only an ecological nonsense (more so when we talk about hunting …) but also an ethical nonsense as well (but hunters have for a long time now demonstrated their total lack of ethics!). Along with the ecological and ethical issues there is also the denial of other human activities that also take place outdoors.

Photo: Pierre Athanaze

This scandalous provision is far from being an act of « conservation » as hunters like to claim. This measure allows them to draw from the most beautiful male deer yearlings in order to decorate their chimney breasts with their morbid trophies. As deer lose their antlers in early fall, hunters are more likely to « harvest » their « beautiful » trophies by slaughtering deer in the summer during the breeding season!

The summer shootings are decreed by the prefects at the request of the departmental hunting federations. Requests which are almost systematically followed by orders authorizing this ridiculous activity. So, why would the hunters feel bothered or ashamed? And why slaughter only deer? Hunting federations and managers of hunting areas have asked the public authorities to allow the hunting of fallow deer. More recently we have seen the demand to hunt wild boars and of course, they won.

During the summer season, bucks and fallow deer are hunted as they approach or from lookouts (watchtowers). Wild boars are hunted by a driving method. Every hunter who pursues this disgraceful activity is also allowed to shoot foxes! This without any restrictions! Even after the buck or fallow deer quota is reached, summer shooters will have the right to continue hunting foxes, which is increasingly recognized as assisting agricultural by the farmers themselves. This hunting period, which is added to the so-called general opening period, allows hunters to hunt three and a half months longer! And the holders of these hunting rights to earn even more money. One can find at most organized private hunts offers of overnight accommodation and hunts in various departments. Hunters, in need of these bloodthirsty activities, can, with hard cash, quench their deadly thirsts during these three and a half months of extended season. This constitutes an additional financial windfall for those who trade in death.

No, hunting is not, as some people try to make us believe, an act of « conservation » of the wild life, but purely a commercial activity.

Please sign our petition to obtain a radical reform of hunting, and its ban during all weekends and school holidays! And meet with us on October 5th for the 2nd united march against hunting.

Goiat needs us!

Goiat needs us!

Goiat needs us!
28.05.2019
Pyrénées
Goiat needs us!
Wildlife

Was it really necessary to capture and uproot a free-living bear from Slovenia, where he had all his bearings, where he had grown up and to essentially prevent him from feeding where he was eventually forced to settle? One Voice denounces an inhuman policy towards Goiat and more generally the bears concerned by this type of program. We need all of you to help stop the scaring off of bears!

In the name of biodiversity, an inhuman program for bears

Suspected of having attacked herds or domestic animals (pigs, sheep or horses) seven times, the agricultural organizations called for measures against Goiat, a bear of Slovenian origin who had been « released » in the Val d’Aran area by Spanish authorities back in 2016. This was to make up for the lack of genetic diversity in the Pyrenean bear population, which were the descendants from a single male, the Pyros bear. The bears do not understand the borders put in place by humans, Goiat moves between our two countries, followed thanks to the GPS collar with which he was equipped with.

Goiat remained the favourite target of the French anti-bear activists. And this spring, after the attacks of which Goiat is perhaps responsible for, the Prefect of the Hautes-Pyrénées wishes to put in place measures of scaring off in order to remove the bear and let us just say this clearly, try to push it back to the other side of the border… The “bear plan” also stipulates that in the event of a so-called “problem bear”, the State can then launch scaring off operations. But what is a « problem bear »? A bear trying to feed? And what would be the next step warning shots? The slaughter of a bear? Isn’t the goal of bringing bears to the Pyrenees to see them multiply? Along with the inherent risks of their presence?

Let’s take part in a public consultation!

Before the publication of this decree, the Prefecture must carry out a public consultation. It will close on June 14th. In order to prevent this operation of scaring off this bear, many of us must respond unfavourably to this project.

By logging on to the site of the Ministry of Ecological and Inclusive Transition, indicate at the beginning of your comment that you are against the scaring off of Goiat. Then argue your case in a few lines. Please note, comments that are copied and pasted are not taken into account. Use your words and phrases without insults or threats (they would also invalidate your opinion).

To help you, we offer some key arguments. Choose one or more and develop them to your liking.

  • The expertise carried out by the technicians of the National Office of Hunting and Wild Fauna
    (ONCFS) has not shown that the bear Goiat is a « problem bear ».
  • Contrary to what is written in the draft decree, in no case does Goiat behave in a familiar manner. The attacks attributed to him took place at night, several hundred meters from homes, in the absence of any human presence. The term « familiar » is therefore not only abusive, but fallacious. In the absence of familiar behaviour, it cannot therefore be categorized as « problem bear » and should therefore not be frightened.
  • Only the installation of means of protection of these breeding herds is able to protect the animals in the long run from attacks from wild predators, but also from stray dogs which are responsible for much more damage to the herds than any of these bears, wolves and lynx put together.
  • The farmer who has suffered two attacks does not have a guard dog for his herd. This deficiency on his part must in no case be turned against wildlife.
  • The predations that Goiat is accused of all took place at night. The herds were poorly protected (lack of electrified fences, ineffective or absent guard dogs, etc.).
  • The installation of electric fences around bee hives was enough to protect them from Goiat, which was filmed nearby by an ONCFS hidden camera on 9th August 2017, demonstrating, if necessary, that simple means of protection are effective in protecting against the damage caused by a large predator.

We are counting on you. A big thank you to everyone.

Two bloodthirsty killers of sea turtles caught in Mayotte!

Two bloodthirsty killers of sea turtles caught in Mayotte!

Two bloodthirsty killers of sea turtles caught in Mayotte!
27.05.2019
Mayotte
Two bloodthirsty killers of sea turtles caught in Mayotte!
Wildlife

Two men caught in the act of killing sea turtles in Mayotte have been immediately put on trial on Monday May 27th 2019 at 2 p.m. at the Mamoudzou Criminal Court. The poachers-including a repeat offender employed by the department to protect these turtles-were filmed at night last week capturing, mutilating, butchering, then transporting two turtles. Between cruelty and the lack of means to defend these animals who are in great danger, One Voice directly questions the weakness of the law, and the lack of political will to act. We are a civil party in this case.

photo:  François-Elie Paute / Oulanga na Nyamba

The killing of the two sea turtles was filmed

The facts are serious. On the night of May 23rd to 24th on a Mayotte beach, two men are filmed surrounding two sea turtles, kicking them to make them move and then stunning them. They then butchered them with a knife while they are as it seems still alive, to then leave the shells on the beach and take the meat in their canoes. An endless and excruciating suffering for these two green turtles who had come to lay their eggs on the beach.

Who protects these endangered sea turtles?

In the world, all species of sea turtles are threatened, as also in the French territories and oceans which have as many responsibilities. However, in Mayotte, the poaching of green turtles reaches frightening proportions. About 400 of them are skinned each year on the beaches of the French islands of the Comoros archipelago. The Mahoran association Oulanga Na Nyamba, which works to protect sea turtles and their habitat, has no real means of acting. But how did we manage to leave these associations alone in the face of such a tragedy, these poor animals who disappeared in such terrible circumstances and suffering?

One of the poachers was paid by the state to watch after the turtles!

Laws, once published, must be enforced and it is up to the state to deploy the means necessary to enforce them. What have we learned here? One of the poachers, had donned the cap emblazoned with the slogan « save the turtles » and to top it all off, this was an employee of the departmental council, whose role was to watch over poachers. One who would then take advantage of this status and then to have poached for several months! A repeat offender, we found an interview dating from 2011, in which he was filmed with knife in hand on a beach with kilos of meat in his canoe. Confronted by activists already reminding him of the law, but failing to do any more. He was employed by the Departmental Council of Mayotte after a conviction…

In a report broadcasted by TF1, a program called « Sept à Huit » in November 2011, we can see the poacher / an employee of the departmental council interviewed on Papani beach during one of his nocturnal « outings ».

The Ecological Defence Council, just an empty shell

Hydrocarbons and noise from boats, fishing, plastic, poaching, climate change, disappearance of their habitat and breeding grounds, etc.: sea turtles are threatened from all sides, which is why they are supposed to be protected. For decades, successive French governments have looked elsewhere. Today, Emmanuel Macron establishes an Ecological Defence Council. We hope it will not be just an empty shell and that the turtle’s alarm call will be heard. We expect strong and effective actions, implemented quickly and for the long term.

Cruelty to free wild animals is never punished

How can you not be disgusted, revolted when you learn the terrible fate of these two poor turtles? Since the latter were free wild animals, whatever the cruelty to which they are the victims of, whatever the mutilations they have undergone, one can only file a complaint on their behalf for infringement of a protected species, not for unimaginable suffering they have endured. Beyond this status which, therefore, alone, protects them (and still, so little), it is implausible that these sensitive animals are not protected from acts of cruelty by the current texts! Animals are not just representatives of their species, which should just be protected as a matter of principle. Every individual should have the right not to be mistreated or violated!

Both poachers face jail time. Our lawyer also represents the association Oulanga Na Nyamba at the trial on Monday May 27th in Mayotte. We are waiting for concrete acts from the government in favour of animals, and a profound change in policy towards the living. Our parliamentarians must also take their share of the responsibility.

Prada stops using fur while in France we continue talking…

Prada stops using fur while in France we continue talking…

Prada stops using fur while in France we continue talking…
22.05.2019
Prada stops using fur while in France we continue talking…
Fashion

One Voice leads a nonviolent fight to defend animal rights and respect all life forms. The organization operates independently and is thus free to speak and act freely.

While One Voice has been present for several weeks at the meetings held by the Ministry of Ecological and Inclusive Transition to discuss animal welfare and in particular mink farming, the Prada group announces that it will stop using fur.It is one of the fastest labels known so far to adopt the stance of the Fur Free Alliance, thanks to our unprecedented mobilization!

A campaign that hit home!

We
campaigned along with the public right up to the door steps of the
Prada stores, during the Fashion Weeks of Milan, Paris, London and
New York last September. We were present on the side-lines of the
fashion shows while the biggest names in fashion presented their
spring-summer collections. Our simultaneous campaigns all over the
world had challenged the leaders of the Prada group on the need to
follow the international movement of ethics and respect for animals.

At the announcement of the
talks between the Prada group and our Italian and American partners,
the LAV and the Humane Society of United States, we stopped all media
coverage. The change was underway, it was only a matter of time. Last
October, during the biannual FFA meeting in Stockholm, discussions
were going well, we knew that the brand agreed in principle. Only the
logistical details and the deadlines for setting up remained.

It is now official: at Prada,
we will no longer wear fur for the 2020 women’s winter collection, in
other words, right now!
What a huge victory for all of us at the Fur Free Alliance! Because not only Prada, but all of the
other group’s brands are committed. So Miu Miu, Church’s, Car Shoes
and others are committed!

Muriel Arnal, Founding
President of One Voice, announces:

«The Ministry of Ecology is still looking for ways to improve the operating conditions for mink in less than a dozen farms in France while a new big brand in the fashion world is clearly positioned against fur! Again, and again, where are the positive actions from the ministry for the planet, biodiversity and animals ?»

Citizen
engagement has shown its strength. It is high time that our
decision-makers finally realized that producing fur at the cost of
sacrificing sentient beings and nature is unacceptable.

Departmental Discussions on the Welfare of Caged Mink

Since
the launch of the working groups at the Ministry of Ecological and
Inclusive Transition, we fear that the discussions will be sterile,
while wishing them to be constructive. If it is once again a question
of modifying the size of the cages and not putting an end to the
breeding of mink for coats, in France, we will let everyone know that
this is a complete farce.
We
are determined, because both the cruelty of breeding and that of the
killings must be exposed.

We did this in 2016 in six French farms. What we found there is no exception, it’s the norm!
Stress, misery, soil pollution, biodiversity tragedies, etc. The
farms must close, in no way must they multiply or be enlarged. Foxes,
chinchillas, minks, rabbits and our fellow citizens deserve better! A
program of permanent shutdowns must be implemented in the form of a
ministerial decree this summer!

Call
for a ban on the breeding of animals for their fur in France ! Please
sign our petition !

Prada Group joins the Fur Free retailer program

Prada Group joins the Fur Free retailer program

Prada Group joins the Fur Free retailer program
22.05.2019
World
Prada Group joins the Fur Free retailer program
Fashion

Today, the Prada group announces that it will no longer use animal fur in its creations or in its new products, in other words from the SS2020 (spring-summer 2020) women’s collections. Currents stocks will continue to be sold until all relevant stocks and quantities are exhausted. The Prada Group’s announcement follows a collaboration between the luxury brand and members of the Fur Free Alliance (FFA), a coalition of more than 50 animal welfare associations in more than 40 countries.

« The Prada Group is focused on innovation and social responsibility and our fur-free policy-launched as a result of a constructive dialogue with the Fur Free Alliance, and more specifically with LAV and the Humane Society of the United States. It is an extension of the commitment », said Miuccia Prada. « Refocusing on innovative materials will allow the company to explore new frontiers in creative design while meeting the demand for ethical products.  »

For Muriel Arnal, president and founder of One Voice and the French representative of the Fur Free Alliance, « The commitment of the Prada Group will certainly give a boost to other brands. It’s a great victory for citizen engagement at a global level, and a very encouraging sign that times are changing for the benefit of animals. What a great victory that Prada is embarking on the path of ethics and innovation! »

« The Fur Free Alliance congratulates the Prada Group for giving up fur, » says Fur Free Alliance President Joh Vinding. « The Prada Group, with its brands, is now joining the growing list of fur-free brands that respond to the changing attitude of consumers towards animals. »

Brigit Oele, program manager of the Fur Free Alliance, explains: « The Prada group was one of the fastest companies to give up using fur once a constructive dialogue started with our coalition, there has barely been more than a year. The Fur Free Retailer program involves a thousand companies, which indicates that this global movement is rapidly gaining momentum. Thus, there is very little chance that fur will once again become acceptable. It’s a great day for animals! »