One Voice is filing a complaint against Genclis for abuse of animals in laboratories

One Voice is filing a complaint against Genclis for abuse of animals in laboratories

One Voice is filing a complaint against Genclis for abuse of animals in laboratories
20.11.2022
France
One Voice is filing a complaint against Genclis for abuse of animals in laboratories
Animal testing

On 6 April 2022, One Voice brought a complaint against Genclis (Genomic Clinical Synergy) to the Nancy Legal Tribunal for abuse of animals placed under the care of an owning establishment and using animals for scientific purposes (mice, who are bred and used for testing). The Association has also requested the suspension of the authorisation granted to this business to carry out their activities.

We have had access to the inspection report from the DDPP (the veterinarians from the Prefecture) following an administrative procedure by one of our team. This report mentions numerous minor and intermediate non-conformities, in particular inclined towards housing and environment (minor non-conformity following problems with materials, lighting, and temperature), the staff (intermediate non-conformity, insufficiencies in the set-up followed by agents, in their follow-up, in the work carried out by animal welfare organisations, and in the tasks assigned to veterinarians), the animals and the procedures (intermediate non-conformity, the 3Rs strategy and the endpoint are to be reworked) as well as the documents (minor non-conformity, certain obligatory mentions are missing from the documents).

The major non-conformity is connected to the fact that several hundred mice have been reused in experiments before the Ministry of Higher Education, Research, and Innovation and/or the ethical committee had given their agreement. Worse, one of the projects had even been implemented before the request had been filed! And this, for projects of which the oldest dates back to 20 November 2019, is more than a year and a half before this inspection.

Hundreds of mice have therefore been experimented on again and again for years without authorisation and have been kept in non-standard living conditions under the supervision of staff who are poorly trained and are therefore incompetent with regard to animal welfare! We think that these mice, each of which is an individual in its own right, have suffered mistreatment, and we are calling for a suspension of the agreement from the Genclis company. Our complaint went to the public prosecutor on 6 April.

Translated from the French by Joely Justice

A hundred associations on the ground to support the abolition of bullfighting

A hundred associations on the ground to support the abolition of bullfighting

A hundred associations on the ground to support the abolition of bullfighting
14.11.2022
France
A hundred associations on the ground to support the abolition of bullfighting
Exploitation for shows

In line with the numerous and repeated campaigns demanding an end to bullfighting in France, denying access to arenas for minors, or even closing bull fighting schools, the MEP of REV [Revolution for the Living], Aymeric Caron, loyal to his values and commitments, has filed an abolition bill for bullfighting in France alongside the LFI-NUPES group. This bill is supported by more than 130 animal protection associations, gathering together under the same collective —Together for abolition — and is part of the legislative process in the parliamentary niche of La France Insoumise [a French political party]. On 19 and 20 November, these animal defence associations are organising a national coordinated response in more than forty towns in France to support this bill which will be subject to a vote on 24 November.

This bill has the potential to be voted on favourably, given that the cause is cross-party. MEPs from the whole political spectrum have already announced that they will support it.
On their side, the government are continuing to support the ‘tradition’ ad nauseam as a practice that should be sustained, as cruel as it may be, just because it has been around for a long time… Fortunately, our society does not base all of its reasoning on this. We remind you that 87% of French people are in favour of abolishing bullfighting (February 2022 IFOP/FBB survey).

But the parliamentary niche has one fine detail: the bills proposed by the party concerned only have one day to be voted on. If there is not enough time to complete the process, they will be abandoned, pure and simple. On this exact point, our associations have the bitter memory of Cédric Villani in 2020, who could only be introduced in second position…

Bullfighting benefits from a local dispensation for animal torture… that is how cruel and potentially shocking this morbid spectacle is, more so for sensitive people such as children. This is why our associations have supported a ban on access to bullfighting for children and all minors for a long time. We are also asking for the closure of bullfighting schools, in which several One Voice investigations have been carried out to inform on the violence perpetrated on young bulls by student minors encouraged and trained to kill living sentient beings to the detriment of their own mental stability.

Our collective action on the ground, public awareness on the reality of what bullfighting is, and denouncing false pretences, have already meant that less spectators go to arenas to see blood flowing. For weeks, activists from our associations have rallied specifically on this subject and hundreds of leading figures have already shown their support for an end to bullfighting in France.

On 19 and 20 November next year, around forty efforts on the ground are planned throughout France. About twenty by One Voice within the context of their national coordinated action and by Alliance Éthique under the banner of their Let’s Stop Bullfighting collective, as well as their partners, Ensemble pour l’abolition [Together for Abolition], REV [Ecological Revolution for the Living], and the Parti Animaliste [Animalist Party] in around twenty additional towns!
In Paris at the Place du Châtelet, high visual impact action is planned with the participation of Peta.

And on 24 November in Paris, the day of the vote, our associations will once again support the bill before the National Assembly at midday.

NB: events can be changed up until the last minute; please refer to the online event before coming.
They will be updated live.

 

Department Town Online event Precise Location Time Action organised by
05 Digne-les-Bains Have a look at the Facebook event 11 November Roundabout 10am to 2:30pm One Voice
06 Nice Have a look at the Facebook event Place Masséna – le Paillon 11am to 1pm One Voice
10 Troyes Have a look at the Facebook event 71, Rue Émile Zola 3:30pm to 5:30pm One Voice
11 Carcassonne Have a look at the Facebook event cancelled
13 Aix-en-Provence Have a look at the Facebook event Allée de Provence 10:30am to 12pm One Voice
13 Marseille Have a look at the Facebook event Prado Roundabout 2:30pm to 4:30pm
17 La Rochelle Have a look at the Facebook event Place de la Caille 2:30pm to 5pm One Voice
21 Dijon Have a look at the Facebook event Place François Rude 2:30pm to 4pm One Voice
22 Saint-Brieuc Have a look at the Facebook event 2:00pm to 5:00pm
24 Périgueux Have a look at the Facebook event 11:30am to 12:30pm Parti Animaliste
24 Bergerac (20/11) Have a look at the Facebook event 10:30am to 12pm Parti Animaliste
30 Nîmes Have a look at the Facebook event Arènes de Nîmes 12:00pm to 3:00pm Alliance Éthique and One Voice
31 Toulouse Have a look at the Facebook event Square Charles de Gaulle 9:30am to 11am
33 Bordeaux (20/11) Have a look at the Facebook event Place de la Comédie 3:30pm to 5pm One Voice
34 Montpellier Have a look at the Facebook event Place de la Comédie 10:00am to 1:00pm One Voice
34 Béziers Have a look at the Facebook event Rue de la République 10:30-12:30 COLBAC
34 Lunel Have a look at the Facebook event Arènes de San Juan 8:00am to 11:00am Alliance Éthique and One Voice
35 Rennes Have a look at the Facebook event 11:30am to 2pm Sentience
37 Tours Have a look at the Facebook event 11:30-13:00 REV and One Voice
42 Roanne Have a look at the Facebook event 12:00pm to 3:00pm Parti Animaliste
42 Saint-Étienne Have a look at the Facebook event 1:00pm to 5:00pm Parti Animaliste
44 Nantes Have a look at the Facebook event Place Royale 1:30pm to 3pm One Voice
45 Orléans Have a look at the Facebook event 2:00pm to 5:00pm
49 Angers Have a look at the Facebook event Rue Lenepveu 1:30pm to 4pm 259 Life France
56 Lorient Have a look at the Facebook event 3pm to 4:30pm
57 Metz Have a look at the Facebook event 12, rue du petit Paris 3pm to 4:30pm One Voice
58 La-Charité-sur-Loire Have a look at the Facebook event
59 Lille Have a look at the Facebook event Place Richebé 2:30pm to 4pm One Voice
63 Clermont-Ferrand Have a look at the Facebook event 1:00pm to 5:00pm CRAC
64 Bayonne Have a look at the Facebook event Place Jacques Portes 1:30pm to 3pm One Voice
66 Perpignan Have a look at the Facebook event 9:00am to 12:00pm
67 Strasbourg Have a look at the Facebook event Place d’Austerlitz 2pm to 4:30pm One Voice
69 Lyon Have a look at the Facebook event Place Saint-Jean 1:30pm to 4pm One Voice
73 Chambéry Have a look at the Facebook event AJAS
74 Annemasse Have a look at the Facebook event Place de l’Hôtel de ville 1:30pm to 3:30pm One Voice
75 Paris Have a look at the Facebook event Place du Châtelet 10:30am to 12pm One Voice and Peta
76 Rouen (20/11) Have a look at the Facebook event Place de la Cathédrale 2:30pm to 4pm One Voice
76 Le Havre Have a look at the Facebook event Rue Albert André Huet 2:30pm to 4:30pm
80 Amiens Have a look at the Facebook event Place René Goblet 2pm to 4pm One Voice
83 Fréjus Have a look at the Facebook event Place Camille Formigé 11am to 1pm One Voice
83 Toulon Have a look at the Facebook event Quai de la Sinse 9:30am to 11:30am L214
84 Avignon Have a look at the Facebook event Place Pie 10am to 12:30pm One Voice

Updated on 15 November: the events have been updated (time, location, etc.) as well as the mention of the one in Paris in the body of the article.

Translated from the French by Joely Justice

One Voice will be at the Nîmes Administrative Tribunal on 15 November 2022 to save the Lozère and Haute-Loire wolves

One Voice will be at the Nîmes Administrative Tribunal on 15 November 2022 to save the Lozère and Haute-Loire wolves

One Voice will be at the Nîmes Administrative Tribunal on 15 November 2022 to save the Lozère and Haute-Loire wolves
12.11.2022
France
One Voice will be at the Nîmes Administrative Tribunal on 15 November 2022 to save the Lozère and Haute-Loire wolves
Wildlife

On Tuesday 15 November 2022, One Voice will be in Nîmes to get the decree allowing wolves to be killed in the towns of Chanaleilles, Saint-Alban-sur-Limagnole, and Lajo, where it is currently forbidden, urgently suspended. For the Association, who are very committed to their defence, the stakes are high and the urgency is real: wolves’ lives are at stake. The Lozère and Haute-Loire Prefects have published this decree that permits the authorisation of a wolf massacre, even if it puts the species in even more danger, rather than making farmers to face up to their responsibilities, particularly in correctly protecting herds.

As a reminder, wolves are a species protected by the Bern Convention as well as the 1992 ‘Habitats’ Directive. The latter has imposed an implementation of strict protection for wolves within the member states. France has therefore taken steps for this purpose, which appear in the Environmental Code. As always, exemptions to this protection can nevertheless be legally approved if conditions are met…

They still have to be! This is what we are calling into question in our application targeting the 26 October decree. For us, these irregularities may mean that the court recognises that there is a doubt on the legality of the decree.

For example, the Prefect merely says, with no further clarification, that the farmers concerned have implemented protection measures for herds002C without justifying that they are effective, while it is, however, a sine qua non condition for shooting permissions to be granted. The damage attributed to the wolves is debatable at the very least. Another essential circumstance required to authorise an exemption: a steady increase in shooting (scaring, then simple defence, then intense, and finally, ‘testing’ shots), without even having been implemented beforehand.

At the same time, there is a veritable urgency to suspend the decree because it has been in place for around fifteen days and the wolves’ deaths is by definition irreversible. Their species is protected and pastoral activities are not in danger. Furthermore, according to science, the efficacy of shooting to reduce damage is not proven.

Finally, when damage is present, the State compensates for it. Furthermore, we cannot forget that herds are destined for the abattoir by farmers, and that herding is no longer what it used to be. The practice is different, the number and type of animals have also evolved… not for the better, either for nature or for animals.

On 7 November 2022, One Voice therefore filed an emergency interim suspension proceeding which deals with the immediate effects of the decree, and an appeal for cancellation which deals with the legality of the decree. The emergency interim proceeding hearing is set for 15 November at the Nîmes Administrative Tribunal.

Once again we find ourselves in a situation where Prefects prefer a form of social harmony, sparing the sensitivity of farmers who can turn out to be violent when they do not win their case (we have seen this even recently) rather than respecting the principles of protecting an endangered species. The inter-prefectural decree that we are challenging is a dispensation of the existing law — which to us already does not seem sufficiently protective — allowing more wolves to be killed again and again, while the necessary conditions for its authorisation are not even met.

Translated from the French by Joely Justice

Forced swimming: other approaches are possible

Forced swimming: other approaches are possible

Forced swimming: other approaches are possible
07.11.2022
France
Forced swimming: other approaches are possible
Animal testing

The Ministry of Research has approved electric shock and forced swimming procedures this year in France, while businesses worldwide are abandoning this largely criticised test that lobbies have trouble defending. Animals should not suffer for us, especially as substitution methods and non-experimental solutions exist to help people who are suffering.

The recent uses of the forced swimming test do not look to mimic human depression (something which this test does very badly), but to predict the efficacy of molecules on the depressive state. Despite quite poor recent data in terms of the proportion of positive results for this prediction, we therefore cannot say that the forced swimming test is absolutely useless if it is carried out rigorously and with control of all of the variables that can influence the result. But the fact that a test using animals can be useful is not to say that it is justified.

Furthermore, as recently remarked by the NC3R (British centre mainly dedicated to alternatives for animal experimentation), effective molecules and pioneering routes could have been forgotten due to overconfidence in the results of this test.

In addition, other tests exist that are much less stressful for the animals, particularly in measuring their memory capacity to evaluate the effect of different molecules. But it is still the breeding of animals, caging them, and using them for our interests that is unacceptable.

Substitution methods

If we stick to ‘replacement’ as defined by French regulations, with the idea of aiming for the same short-term objectives and discovering the same experimental results without animals, the solutions are indeed very few but they exist and can be developed.

Cell culture research in this field does not allow us to estimate the behavioural effect of medications but is interesting in evaluating the biological effects which can be largely predictable concerning the efficacy of antidepressants. This is what was recently highlighted by the NC3R, by noting the predictive capacity already established in this field and the promising development of the amount of BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor) in human blood and neuronal cell cultures.

From a technical standpoint, “computational psychiatry” is developed over several years, which will undoubtedly quickly make it possible to study many aspects of psychiatric diseases without hurting anyone.

But there may be better ways to measure: favouring prevention and putting favourable conditions in place for effective psychotherapy.

Prevention and non-medical treatments

When it comes to prevention, priority should be given to funding work on the external factors of depression and chronic stress in order to reduce the number of people affected by depression brought on by unfit working conditions or by exposure to a harmful social, political, and economic environment. Subsidies are not willingly extended. The money that funds forced swimming tests and the suffering inflicted on these animals is money that will not be used for working on the prevention of depression[1].

In addition, in a report from a very recent French documentary, Franck Ramus (a researcher in cognitive sciences) highlighted the link between the high use of psychoactive drugs in France and the superiority of the university curriculum for psychology by approaches based on beliefs rather than on proof, which had already been highlighted during a conference held in 2013 on this subject. The public therefore found themselves exposed to a majority of psychologists and psychiatrists who use unsuitable tools to treat them. Instead of funding the use of animals to develop medicine further, we can better use this money to embark upon an urgent reform of teaching psychotherapy and putting in place public information campaigns aiming to guide them towards effective treatments.

Animals must not suffer for us

Rats, these wonderful creatures full of empathy, who laugh, who play, who think, who feel emotions as complex as regret, do not have to suffer for us.

And what we can say for certain today is that the 600 rats who have been approved by the Ministry of Research to be used for repeated electric shock and forced swimming tests will suffer. This is happening in 2022, in France.

Join us in asking the Ministry of Research to ban these tests

On cruelty

Click on the text to tweet: Stop electric shocks and forced swimming for animals! Public powers should not authorise these cruel experiments @sup_recherche #StopForcedSwimming #EndAnimalTesting #AnimalTesting https://ctt.ec/_h2fq+ via @onevoiceanimal

Click on the text to tweet: .@sup_recherche, France must commit, like laboratories abroad, to put an end to cruel forced swimming tests on mice and rats!
#StopForcedSwimming #EndAnimalTesting #AnimalTesting https://ctt.ec/UPW92+ via @onevoiceanimal

On alternatives

Click on the text to tweet: Making rats depressed with electric shocks will not give more effective treatments. Stop #AnimalTesting, sup_recherche ! #StopForcedSwimming #EndAnimalTesting https://ctt.ec/iV6Un+ via @onevoiceanimal

Click on the text to tweet: Instead of torturing rats to produce yet more medications, train psychologists and psychiatrists with 21st century tools!
@sup_recherche #StopForcedSwimming #EndAnimalTesting #AnimalTesting https://ctt.ec/omBL7+ via @onevoiceanimal

Click on the text to tweet: Stop electric shocks and forced swimming! More funding for in vitro methods! @sup_recherche #StopForcedSwimming #EndAnimalTesting #AnimalTesting https://ctt.ec/c1dLo+ via @onevoiceanimal

[1] The reallocation of funds is not particularly simple and must be done on a political level for public funding, and by raising awareness of foundations and other organisations for private subsidies. But this reallocation seems largely necessary when we see the suffering that is generated by the current allocation of funding.

This article is the fourth in a series of five on forced swimming:

  1. Electric shocks and forced swimming in France in 2022
  2. Forced swimming: footage
  3. Forced swimming: the businesses moving forward and the industry that resists
  4. Forced swimming: other approaches are possible
  5. Forced swimming: a long-term battle

Translated from the French by Joely Justice

Urgent suspension of black grouse hunting in two out of three areas in the Hautes-Alpes!

Urgent suspension of black grouse hunting in two out of three areas in the Hautes-Alpes!

Urgent suspension of black grouse hunting in two out of three areas in the Hautes-Alpes!
26.10.2022
Hautes-Alpes
Urgent suspension of black grouse hunting in two out of three areas in the Hautes-Alpes!
Wildlife

The Marseille Administrative Tribunal is urgently suspending black grouse hunting in two out of three bioclimatic areas in the Hautes-Alpes. The urgent applications judge admitted that the black grouse should be spared here, due to their vulnerability. Another victory for One Voice in favour of these individuals who already have such a hard time surviving without adding hunting to the mix…

In their ruling, the urgent applications judge started by rejecting the hunters’ objections regarding our arguments and then announced that there is the utmost urgency for black grouse. Finally, he decided to suspend hunting, which “compromises[…] conservation efforts of this species in its area of distribution”, namely, for him, in two of the three bioclimatic regions mentioned in the Hautes-Alpes Prefect’s decree. In the ‘Inner Northern Alps’, 37 black grouse were involved, and in the ‘Northern Pre-Alps’, 9 of them were targeted. In the third area, we will argue our point of view again when the case is judged for it to be cancelled. The LPO PACA and the SAPN-FNE Hautes-Alpes, who also attacked this decree, also received the same decision.

The decree must from now on be judged in substance for the entirety of the three zones concerned. The date is not yet set for this hearing, which must take place within several months. But it is already a very good victory, essential for the mountain Galliformes spared, who are added to those that the Association has already managed to save this year in Savoie, the Pyrénées-Atlantiques, and the Alpes-de-Haute-Provence.

Translated from the French by Joely Justice

Animal testing on the radio

Animal testing on the radio

Animal testing on the radio
26.10.2022
France
Animal testing on the radio
Animal testing

Despite requests from us, including a letter sent to France Culture and to the Radio France intermediary to expose them to the problems of framing and the content of the recent episode on animal testing, we have not received any response. You can help to change things.

On 7 September, France Culture invited two people who are in favour of animal testing on to ‘La Science — CQFD’, preventing any substantive debate on ethical issues.

A valuable episode

Since this date, we have regularly listened to ‘La Science – CQFD’. In contrast with the episode on animal testing, we particularly recommend that you listen to the episodes from 9 and 30 September, which gave the floor to Jane Goodall and Frans de Waal, ethologists and primatologists.

Another positive point: on 28 September, a researcher invited on to the episode regarding Alzheimer’s disease criticised the methodologies currently used in animal testing to study this pathology and to a great extent put forward the use in studying disorders directly on the people who are affected.

Where is the debate on ethics?

Unfortunately, the report from 28 September presented a recent French study having consisted of implanting neuronal cells of humans affected by Alzheimer’s into mice… without calling into question the ethicsof this practice. Animal testing therefore seems to be considered by default to be an acceptable practice in the episode.

The ethical questioning on practices exploiting animals must be systematic, however. This incidentally is the reason for the Montreal Declaration, launched on 4 October and today gathering more than 500 signatures from global specialists on moral and political philosophy and animal ethics.

You can help

Today, we therefore invite you to express your feelings to the Radio France mediator in a brief and polite manner, to highlight the quality of ‘La Science – CQFD’ in general, the specific problems in the 7 September episode on animal testing, and the ethical and social urgency of always questioning these practices when they are mentioned on air in public.

With your help, it will be possible to open the path towards a true in-depth public debate so that the situation finally evolves to fast-track the end of animal testing.

Translated from the French by Joely Justice

One Voice is and always will be in favour of a true hunting reform!

One Voice is and always will be in favour of a true hunting reform!

One Voice is and always will be in favour of a true hunting reform!
25.10.2022
France
One Voice is and always will be in favour of a true hunting reform!
Wildlife

More than eight in ten French people are in favour of a hunting ban two days a week including Sunday, and throughout the entirety of the school holidays (IPSOS/One Voice Survey, September 2022). Everywhere where One Voice has investigated in the hunting environment, alcohol has been present. Despite the ‘smoke and mirrors’ efforts by the Fédération nationale des chasseurs [National Federation of Hunters] to make its members aware of safety (like the reminder of 30° angles so as not to shoot your hunting neighbour), it is clear that they are insufficient to curb the deaths and injuries listed each year. The idea of training hunters in first aid is proof that there is nothing insignificant about this hobby.

According to Muriel Arnal, President of One Voice:

«Hunting is the only hobby that can kill those who do not practice it. The creation of a blood alcohol level offence in hunting would be a good start, but who would be in charge of carrying out the controls and what would the consequence be? We should not stop at the impact of setting it.»

A government won over by the hunting lobby

The Secretary of State in charge of Ecology, Bérangère Couillard, is launching a consultation this Tuesday on the areas of work regarding the safety of hunting. This is following a governmental policy very unfavourable towards free wildlife, at least since the first election of Emmanuel Macron, and a clear show in favour of hunters; and this is systematically ignoring legal decisions or devastating problems linked to climate chaos on the environment and its inhabitants. They also follow numerous manslaughters and injuries of varying severities on those who benefit from nature: local residents, cyclists, motorists, foragers, hikers…

The dramatic death of Morgan Keane who was shot while he was in his garden resulted in more than 122,000 signatures on the One Day One Hunter [Un jour un chasseur] petition on the Senate’s site. In line with our previous requests, it asked for safety in hunting, particularly through hunt-free days so that everyone can enjoy nature without risking their life. The Senate Committee welcomed us, like many of our partners, but submitted a report far from being on the level of what is at stake. For the umpteenth time, it takes waiting for humans to be a hunters’ target for the government to act against the privileges that they benefit from constantly.

On-the-ground expertise developed by One Voice on hunting

One Voice has been leading in-depth work on the world of hunting for many years. This whistle-blowing work is essential against a lobby who has connections with the President of the Republic’s office.

To show the reality ignored by non-hunters, their investigators have, among other things, infiltrated the gun hunting world, from hunting with hounds, penned hunting, or even underground fox and badger hunting with hounds, and shown what hunters do and say between them when they are not thinking about either monitoring or controls.

During these years of investigating, we have been witness to hunting parties where everyone was drinking wine in abundance at midday — and sometimes since the morning! — before multiple hunts. The statements made and recorded regarding safety are themselves just as alarming.

An animal defence association who has won many legal victories

One Voice has also filed numerous requests to have the prefectural and ministerial decrees cancelled that they consider to be abusive. Among their notable victories: the decree on glue-trapping, and the suspension and cancellations of the decrees on traditional hunting of small birds, alongside the LPO. But also the suspension of several decrees on mountain Galliformes and the additional period of digging out badgers, in particular.

This painstaking work has also made it possible, on a political level, to contribute to a law, albeit imperfect, on de-fencing in Sologne, and multiple law propositions.

French people have a favourable opinion of a radical hunting reform

One Voice had organised two successive annual joint marches for a radical reform of hunting before the pandemic hit the world in 2020.

The Association has supported around ten high-priority flagship measures for a radical reform of hunting, widely supported by around forty associations and several hundred thousands of people and validated by the opinions of French people (in several surveys by IPSOS in 2019, 2021, 2022).

It is obvious that One Voice is in favour of more measures to allow everyone to benefit from nature in peace. The minister does not seem closed off to the idea of no hunting on a Sunday. This will be a start. A limit on blood alcohol level before operating firearms identical to that in place before driving seems to be the minimum for us. It is high time! Provided that the controls and authorities are also there.

Translated from the French by Joely Justice

One Voice will defend black grouse at the Marseille Administrative Tribunal on Monday 24 October 2022

One Voice will defend black grouse at the Marseille Administrative Tribunal on Monday 24 October 2022

One Voice will defend black grouse at the Marseille Administrative Tribunal on Monday 24 October 2022
23.10.2022
Hautes-Alpes
One Voice will defend black grouse at the Marseille Administrative Tribunal on Monday 24 October 2022
Wildlife

As their counterpart did in Savoie for three emblematic species of mountain Galliformes, the Hautes-Alpes Prefect has, in mid-September, issued a decree fixing the number of black grouse that can be hunted in the department. While the birds are facing difficulties unmatched in our era and the species is in decline, the hunters can add to the problem by slaughtering 270 of them in the context of their recreational hobby. The hunting season is open. We need to act urgently. One Voice will be at the hearing at the Marseille Administrative Tribunal on Monday 24 October 2022 to defend black grouse.

One Voice has filed an emergency interim proceeding with a view to getting the prefectural authorisation allowing these slaughters urgently suspended, as well as a fundamental appeal, because the Association is rebelling against the fact that hunters use animals as targets for pleasure with free rein from the State, knowing perfectly well that their shots do nothing but worsen an already disastrous situation for biodiversity.

Why are black grouse being shot down more when they are in decline?

In this specific case, black grouse are part of a protected species (under the Birds Directive on a European level and the Environmental Code in French law) because they are classified on a national level on the red list of threatened bird species by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as ‘near-threatened’ and ‘vulnerable’ in the Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur region. They are protected for a reason!

The proof is that the Observatoire des Galliformes de Montagne (OGM), who measure the evolution of the strength of these individuals, clearly shows that the population has been in decline for more than twenty years. And that the reproduction of the species in 2022 and in previous years is insufficient in relation to authorised hunting acts.

How can we allow these animals to be killed for pleasure, derogating from several layers of protection put in place to guarantee their conservation, adding also to the difficulties that they must confront to reproduce? We must urgently prevent black grouse from continuing to be shot at!

Precedents that make you optimistic in Grenoble and Marseille

The Grenoble Administrative Tribunal has also agreed by urgently interrupting the Savoie decree application of 20 October relating in particular to black grouse (but also rock partridges and rock ptarmigans). Equally in Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, around fifteen days before, the prefectural decrees had been suspended on the section concerning black grouse: we had been successful with regards to our voluntary intervention alongside the LPO.

We hope that it will be the same in the Hautes-Alpes following the 23 October hearing where we will be fighting once again alongside the LPO against prefectural services to help save the lives of hundreds of mountain birds.

Translated from the French by Joely Justice

The Muller Circus in Vallauris: illegal set-up, a dumping ground, animals kept in despicable conditions…

The Muller Circus in Vallauris: illegal set-up, a dumping ground, animals kept in despicable conditions…

The Muller Circus in Vallauris: illegal set-up, a dumping ground, animals kept in despicable conditions…
23.10.2022
Alpes-Maritimes
The Muller Circus in Vallauris: illegal set-up, a dumping ground, animals kept in despicable conditions…
Exploitation for shows

Since the beginning of October, the Muller Circus has been illegally set up in the town of Vallauris. Having disallowed shows with animals, the Mayor, Kevin Luciano, had refused to allow the lorries to set up. In a few days, the place had become, as always, a no-go area. Whistle-blowers went to the site. We are publishing the footage. At the same time, on 14 October, the Grasse Legal Tribunal issued a ruling for the circus to evacuate.

Between the lorries, cardboard and boards littered the ground. At the edge of the beach, large boxes with “Danger: animals” signs on them were washed up, leaving little doubt about where they came from… And in the middle of this pigsty, we found baboons locked up, minuscule cage-crates containing poor rats placed in a container… and Jumbo in a pool more and more resembling a rubbish truck. What can we say, finally, about the state of the tyres on his prison-trailer? They were as smooth as a baby’s skin. A miracle that a flat tyre had not already caused the lorry to go off the road.

To ensure the law be respected in the Vallauris town, Kevin Luciano filed a complaint against the Muller Circus set up in a car park in the town whose barrier they had forced. This time, the Grasse Tribunal ruled urgently and made an exemplary decision: removal of the circus by force. Remember that before having received the go-ahead from the committee delivering the lifetime competency certifications for Jumbo, the legal system had ruled for the hippopotamus to be seized, which was aborted due to the circus performers’ violence

And since leaving Vallauris, the Muller Circus has set up in Trans-en-Provence, needless to say on private land… We are starting to hope that a judge will end up deciding that the animals kept here should all be seized.

We have numerous complaints under way against this circus, the two latest of which were filed in August and October this year after them passing through Gap and Valbonne (where they performed just before going to Vallauris and lied to the Mayor). We are asking you once again to sign the petition to save Jumbo from the Muller Circus. We will stop at nothing for the animals being exploited by them.

Translated from the French by Joely Justice

Victory for mountain Galliformes: One Voice has had the Savoie Prefect’s decree suspended!

Victory for mountain Galliformes: One Voice has had the Savoie Prefect’s decree suspended!

Victory for mountain Galliformes: One Voice has had the Savoie Prefect’s decree suspended!
22.10.2022
Savoie
Victory for mountain Galliformes: One Voice has had the Savoie Prefect’s decree suspended!
Wildlife

On 18 October, One Voice defended the black grouse, rock partridges, and rock ptarmigans at the Grenoble Administrative Tribunal. The judge has just ruled for an urgent suspension of the Savoie Prefect’s decree allowing them to be hunted up until 11 November 2022. Furthermore, the hunting acts on these emblematic birds were authorised on very significant quotas, respectively: 414, 190, and 60 individuals.

The fundamental decision, which will take place as a result of an upcoming hearing, the date of which we do not know yet, will determine the legality or illegality of the decree. Our lawyer, from Maitre Gossement’s office, will be representing us once again.
While waiting, no more individuals from these three species of mountain birds from the Savoie region can be killed by hunters in this context: the judge has suspended hunting for the three species: rock partridges, black grouse, and rock ptarmigans.

According to Muriel Arnal, Founding President of One Voice:

«It is a great satisfaction to know that less than one week of action by One Voice will allow the lives of hundreds of mountain birds to be saved. For how long can we put up with State representatives remaining deaf and blind to the cries of these birds that are disappearing? A disappearance amplified by the recreational hobby of hunters!»

The Grenoble urgent applications judge ruled that the urgent condition was fulfilled due to the irreversible character of the “destruction” of individuals from this threatened species and the fact that the hunting season was already open. In line with this idea, he also admitted that there was a serious doubt as to the legality of the decree and the decisions associated on the maximum number of animals allowed to be hunted, with regard to the Birds Directive and the Environmental Code, which could compromise conservation efforts undertaken regarding these birds.

The judge also noted that the 106 decisions made on 12 September 2022 by hunters to allocate annual individual hunting plans were acted upon prior to the Prefect’s decree authorising hunting of mountain Galliformes, while the decree of 15 September 2022 should have constituted the basis allowing these to be adopted.

Mountain Galliformes also defended in Pau

In Pau on 19 October, the Administrative Tribunal cancelled the Hautes-Pyrénées prefectural decree of 2 October 2020 that we had obtained a suspension for in October 2020. This one was relating to the hunting of western capercaillies and rock ptarmigans for the 2020-2021 season. It had been attacked by the FNE Midi-Pyrénées, FNE Hautes-Pyrénées, and Nature en Occitanie Associations, who One Voice joined as a voluntary participant.

As we have condemned for years, the prefectures thus seem to be the place for hunters to register their wishes… A public policy must come from a balanced decision, taking into account all of the parties involved, those defending animals and wildlife included. And certainly not to support the private interests of a small group who intend to practice their ‘hobby’ as they see fit: hunting. All of our futures depend on it.

Translated from the French by Joely Justice