Tuesday 03 October 2017 | 37

40 legalized killings of wolves: One Voice opposes this

40 legalized killings of wolves: One Voice opposes this

Mis à jour le 25 March 2019

The list of slaughtered wolves continues to grow. 40 is the quota authorized by the government: we are at 19 today. One Voice no longer supports the announcement of all these deaths: stop the massacre of a species already too fragile and put in place solutions respectful of these beings and that of the environment.

Hr blog

The institutionalized death of 40 wolves

Wolf are you there? Can you hear me? Not sure he is still around, if we take the path of the Ministry of Ecological Transition and Solidarity, who authorizes in the decree of July 18th, 2017 the "levy" of 40 wolves without distinction of age or gender within French territory. In other words, the annual measure makes it possible to kill indiscriminately about forty individuals of this species in order not to hinder pastoral activities. 19 have already paid the price, there are only 21 left! But finally, what about the 40 or so of an entire population, will you tell us about this?

Wolves: a species to protect

Many, knowing that 300 is the estimate of the total number of wolves in France and has been so for three years.It’s enough that the species passes the 34% mortality mark to stop its population from growing and to begin a downward trend towards its disappearance. And of course, it is to count these deaths without considering the natural and accidental deaths (accidents of the road) of these magnificent animals. Obviously, protecting them should be a priority, but the government does not see it that way.

An ineffective method to protect herds

The ministry preferred to focus on pastoral activities and this is not the first time. Culling wolves is supposed to reduce the damage caused by these predators on sheep flocks. However, today, no figure allows to affirm that the method is effective. According to the ESCo reports, the impact would even be counterproductive. So even if killing a wolf reduces the size of a pack, it does not diminish its hunting territory. And, as a result of the instability generated by the death of one of their own, wolves live in search of empty spaces and form new groups. The damage caused by them is undeniable, but have we thought of more effective solutions?

Alternatives to unjustified killings

Alternatives exist, but before being implemented, they imply "to consider animals other than interchangeable representatives of a species considered homogeneous".

To be clearer, it is essential to study wolves not only in packs but also as individuals in their own right. These sentient animals also have an intellectual complexity and a variety of behaviours with their peers. The size of the territories, the survival of the litters, the dispersion rate of the wolves differs from one group to the another. If we took the time to observe them, it would be possible to learn to send them intelligible messages or to carry out a targeted and non-violent sampling of threatening individuals after a rigorous surveillance.

In the short term, proven prevention methods can be used. They consist of setting up guarding and enhanced surveillance of herds, or investing in equipment for restraint pens.

Wolves: benefactors for the benefit of the ecosystem

In the collective imagination, wolves are associated with animals arousing dismay and fear. However, for those who want to take a closer look, these are beautiful animals with a sense of smell 20,000 times greater than ours, defending their family and managing to unify their pack with nothing but their howling! Wolves are an integral part of our ecosystem and help maintain its balance. On the other hand, pastoral activity is far from being beneficial for the ecosystem: it causes the degradation of high-altitude grasslands, and contributes to the impoverishment of the fauna and flora. Not to mention that it perpetuates the exploitation of cattle, sheep and goats ...

Stop the slaughter of wolves and find more respectful solutions! But before being able to implement alternatives, One Voice appealed to the State Council to demand right now the cancellation of Article 1 of the decree, namely the slaughter of 40 individuals from July 2017 to June 2018.

Hr blog

In the subject

Wolves: the European Commission in favour of massacring them New wolf captivity areas? It’s a no!

Comments 37

I accept that publication of my comments is subject to the code of conduct.

chamois | Wednesday 04 October 2017

Pour dire Stop aux tirs sur les loups, rendez-vous le 14 octobre à Nice, 14h place Masséna pour une manifestation organisée par le collectif La Voix des Loups

dany | Wednesday 04 October 2017

ON EN A MARRE DU MASSACRE DES LOUPS TOUT CELA AU NOM DES ELEVEURS QUI EUX MEME MASSACRENT LEUR TROUPEAU, POUR LE PROFIT
LA VIE DES LOUPS NOUS IMPORTE. IL A DROIT DE VIE SUR LE SOL FRANCAIS COMME TOUT AUTRE ANIMAL. IL EST UTILE DAVANTAGE QUE NE L EST L ETRE HUMAIN EN TOUS CAS

goldiepuppchen | Wednesday 04 October 2017

Le loup, contrairement aux humains, ne tue pas par plaisir mais pour survivre !
M. Yourcenar : "L'animal ne possède rien, sauf sa vie que bien souvent on lui prend" !

Quant à ceux qui veulent tuer les loups pour sauver les agneaux, ils feraient mieux de se taire car tuer un agneau pour être consommé, c'est encore plus horrible !

trochu | Wednesday 04 October 2017

Plus que révoltant et inacceptable et que fait donc Mr Hulot dans tout ça et à quoi sert il pour ordonner et cautionner toujours plus de tirs de loups, ce n'est que honteux et scandaleux et nous ne pouvons l'accepter ni le tolérer. Je suis toujours plus choquée de constater à quel point ce gouvernement comme tous les autres d'ailleurs, sont indifférents et insensibles à la cause animale et soutiennent éleveurs et chasseurs plutôt que de prendre la défense et protection des plus faibles dont les animaux et c'est cela qui doit changer, car aucun animal n'est sur terre pour satisfaire les besoins d'humains. Il est tout de même très intéressant que dans d'autres nombreux pays, la cohabitation entre loups et éleveurs ne pose aucun problème, il n'y a qu'en France que ces animaux "dérangent" et tous les prétextes sont bons pour faire croire à la population qu'il n'y a pas d'autre mesure que tuer les loups pour protéger les troupeaux, alors qu'il existe très certainement d'autres solutions pacifiques et respectueuses mais les autorités choisissent toujours la facilité lorsqu'il s'agit d'animaux à tuer.......... MERCI INFINIMENT One Voice de ne pas accepter que 40 loups soient encore tués pour le plaisir des éleveurs, Les loups sont à leurs places dans nos forêts nos montagnes et ce n'est pas aux humains de les faire "disparaître " ils sont autant chez eux voire plus car présents bien plus qu' avant les humains, que nous. Nous
devons tout faire afin que soient interdits ces tirs de loups mais aussi afin qu'il n'y en ait plus jamais.