When the birds fall from the sky

When the birds fall from the sky

When the birds fall from the sky
15.11.2019
When the birds fall from the sky
Hunting

From the skies of our countryside and cities, birds are disappearing everywhere. Dying from hunger, under a hail of bullets or from hunting with glue, what else remains for them, hope? For each of them, we will fight to the end.

Birds are disappearing everywhere. This phenomenon is general, it spares neither birds from the cities, nor from the countryside. 421 million birds have disappeared in less than 30 years in Europe and 73% of Parisian sparrows in 13 years.

The causes are multiple and cumulative: phytosanitary products, the disappearance of insects, sites where to nest and climate change … As if that were not enough, they must also face so-called managers of nature, those who seem to above all want to eradicate all in their path.

In Deux-Sèvres, partridges are in very poor condition, with eight birds missing from ten. Yes, partridges, the very ones that are supposedly well managed by hunters. Having to endure the local shoots and then the reintroduction to the countryside of these birds by means of the hunters efficient breeding schemes

Irresponsible right up to the end of a rifle

And some speak of “responsible” hunting? But where is the responsibility when one takes to the forests that are deserted by walkers with a gun in hand to shoot all that moves? And of course, there have been mistakes made – damage to a protected species (dogs, cats and even residents who dared to go out into their gardens have been targeted)! Where is the responsibility when we release weakened, fattened animals, who have been selected to be easy prey? Where is the responsibility when using ancestral methods that blindly trap or kill? Where is the responsibility when a bird from a migratory species, has be reintroduced or protected in another country, only to be slaughtered while crossing ours?

Concerning responsibility, well there is obviously none when you see the disappearance of species. And what is left? A bloodthirsty leisure activity which desperately tries to justify its killings when its country’s population is largely opposed to it.

All for one and one for all

So, for all the bird victims, we chose the path of appeal, because a single bird killed by hunting is a bird that will be missing, an individual who had the right to live. For each and every one of them, we will go all the way. And not one case in law through the courts is to be feared in case of failure.

In France, the courts and tribunals are not bound by their previous decisions, but a new act of law can be opposed in a new case. So, nothing to fear then, quite the contrary, for those whom we will protect and continue to fight for without stopping. And since the State Council seems to have taken the side of the hunters by dismissing our requests, it is before the European Commission that they will have to justify their actions!

We will be on November 20th at 2 p.m. be Infront of the State Council for our appeal to the merits concerning these orders of cruel traditional hunts (using glue, etc.) which trap and injure, even kill, blackbirds, thrushes, and many ‘other little birds. We will also be there to cancel the ministerial order authorizing the killing of wild geese during February, while they are crossing our skies and are in full migration. At the beginning of February, we had obtained the suspension of this order.

Micha died on the 12th November

Micha died on the 12th November

Micha died on the 12th November
12.11.2019
Micha died on the 12th November
Circuses

After a few days’ antibiotics were discontinued to see if he could regain his strength by himself, Micha’s health then deteriorated sharply. He would have to be anesthetized to undergo surgery and tests. Several days were necessary before the Tanière could recive this permission…Micha never woke up. He had tumours everywhere, even in his brain.

At the beginning of September, we had already denounced the conditions of extreme misery in which he and his companions were living in at their winter quarters of the Poliakov’s, in Loir-et-Che. The Minister of Ecology, Élisabeth Borne, had then discovered like the rest of the public that his paws were infested with maggots, his
breathing was difficult and then she chose to intervene on his behalf.

Micha left behind him Bony and Glasha, whose suffering is evident, probably less glaring but equally serious, and Mina the little monkey and several parrots, horses and a dromedary, the of which has just died…

Even so, he still lived a real bears life be it only for a few weeks or so, a real bear’s life, eating until he was full, having recovered weight and a well-tempered character. All this after suffering horribly for hours, days, weeks, months, years…

But for the officials, the Prefect, the veterinarian and trainers, who
have for too long permitted that no improvement takes place for the
animals of the Poliakov’s, will they eventually be held accountable! Several law suits are ongoing, including one on November 28th, we will be facing the Prefect of Loir-et-Cher Administrative Court in Orleans.

For twenty years we have been demanding the liberation of the Poliakov’s bears. For almost two months we have been demanding that Bony, Glasha and the other animals are released from their infamous jails. For twenty years we have been calling for the cessation of the exploitation of animals in circuses. How many more deaths will there be before the publication of a ministerial decree prohibiting this medieval practice ?

Please continue to sign and share the petition.

Micha vient de mourir from One Voice on Vimeo.

Dog training: the law of the strongest?

Dog training: the law of the strongest?

Dog training: the law of the strongest?
06.11.2019
Dog training: the law of the strongest?
Domestic animals

One Voice leads a nonviolent fight to defend animal rights and respect all life forms. The organization operates independently and is thus free to speak and act freely.

We are to be sued by the High Court of Valencia for having, it is said, « tainted the entirety of a profession » by denouncing some of the methods that are used in dog training circles, images and testimonies to support.

Update

They
had asked for a postponement of the hearing, we did not oppose it, it
was up to the court to decide.

On
November 5th,
the President of the 1st Chamber categorically opposed any dismissal,
even in the short term, believing that the case was in good
condition. There was therefore no argument. The matter was put under
deliberation ration on January 14th
2020.

The
survey dates back to 2014-2017. Several reported cases have led our
investigators to infiltrate dog training centres. They brought back
facts, images and statements that are spine chilling.

A report, supported by the analysis of a behaviourist veterinarian, and
articles followed, reporting unprecedented brutality against dogs,
committed in front of children (a fine example of education). We have
produced scientific studies on the damage that can result from such
activities, which psychologically break individuals to subject them
to the law of the « master ».

For
having presented these facts, around thirty professionals are asking
us today for more than 170,000 euros for « collective
denigration ».

Freedom of expression!

We
are accused of misinformation when raw facts were filmed and we have
also highlighted the training centres of this profession practicing
methods of care, for balanced dogs and not to be traumatized, those
who are willingly to learn are abandoned if they do not obey the
finger and the eye.

By
underlining the Link, this scientifically substantiated relationship
between violence committed against animals and that against humans in
the vicinity, we have highlighted the fact that brutality is neither
an end in itself nor as animal psychology, but that it can have
serious consequences. This remains visibly incomprehensible to many
canine educators …

A question of respect above all

If
the investigations of the Zoé Cell, our ear on the ground against
cruelty, produced scenes of maltreatment proven in various canine
clubs, whose fault is it? One Voice has only denounced a pedagogy
based on training and brutality, highlighting its shortcomings and
consequences while stressing that other canine education methods,
ethical and sustainable, exist …

As
a non-violent association committed for 25 years in the respect of
all animals, we are proud to have denounced practices unworthy of
fear of seeing them become widespread. We repeat: there is a positive
and non-violent education of dogs provided by professionals. Many
dogs are affected and we are talking about respect for others. We
hope for the foresight of justice. Otherwise all excesses are
allowed, the debate is no longer public and no progress is possible.