Archives: News

One Voice is urgently referring to the legal system against the Ariège Prefecture

One Voice is urgently referring to the legal system against the Ariège Prefecture

One Voice is urgently referring to the legal system against the Ariège Prefecture
18.07.2023
Ariège
One Voice is urgently referring to the legal system against the Ariège Prefecture
Wildlife

For more than two weeks, the Ariège Prefecture has been publishing decrees authorising the implementation of scaring measures using sound effect shots on brown bears with a view to “preventing damage to herds”. These decrees are systematically published to be applied within 48 hours. We protest against this procedure which, as well as posing a problem for bears, also prevents any appeal within an acceptable time frame. The administration are thus knowingly circumventing regulations. They are looking to avoid the situation that happened in summer 2022, where we had its nine decrees allowing bear scaring suspended and then cancelled. We have therefore filed four freedom emergency interim applications. The hearing will take place on Wednesday 19 July at 11:30am at the Toulouse Administrative Tribunal.

Photo: Collectif Hope & ferestecspirineus wildlife photos

Since last year, we have been successful in urgently suspending 9 decrees by the Ariège Prefecture, who have clearly decided to change their strategy, on bear scaring shots. From now on, it is publishing its decrees in such a way that they are applied from the following day and for a maximum duration of two days. They repeat this as often as necessary.

Short-circuiting the regulations

The decrees of Monday 3 July 2023 have authorised bear scaring in the Arreau and Trapech groups’ pastures, which contain 1800 and 2000 sheep respectively, while no night park is set up in these two pastures. These measures were authorised and carried out over two subsequent nights, from 4 to 5 and 5 to 6 July, between 8pm and 7:30am.

On 10 July, the same thing happened on these same pastures. Once again, the prefectural measures were carried out the day following their publication, from Tuesday 11 July at 8pm to Wednesday 12 July at 7:30am and on the following night at the same times.

The Prefect’s ideal is clearly to short-circuit any legal plea and to thus deprive any person or organisation interested in their rights of an effective solution. In fact, even if we were to refer the matter to the courts immediately after the decrees are published, no legal decision would be made before the authorised measures are carried out completely, because, in the context of a suspension interim proceeding, the judges’ decision generally does not take place for between a few days and a few weeks.

After two previous prefectural attempts, we are immediately opposing a third

But we will not leave the bears prey to this vicious bypassing by State services, for pastures that are not even properly protected! This is why we are fighting today with new weapons to put an end to this intolerable prefectural strategy that is becoming more and more widespread.

When, yesterday at the end of the day, the Ariège Department published 3 new decrees authorising these sound shots that are terrorising brown bears in the Arreau and Trapech shepherding groups, as well as in the Massat le Port pasture, from the evening into the following night, we were ready.

The freedom emergency interim hearing is the only plea that would make it possible to obtain a decision before the prefectural decree is completely executed. In fact, the judge must rule within a maximum of 48 hours. We have therefore filed three from today, to try to assert the violation of the right to a balanced environment as well as another so that the Prefect will be compelled to publish their actions with a sufficient time frame before the implementation of scaring measures. The hearing will take place tomorrow, 19 July at 11:30am at the Toulouse Administrative Tribunal.

Translated from the French by Joely Justice

When empathy disappears in the face of laboratories’ objectives: interview with Kevin Vezirian

When empathy disappears in the face of laboratories’ objectives: interview with Kevin Vezirian

When empathy disappears in the face of laboratories’ objectives: interview with Kevin Vezirian
18.07.2023
France
When empathy disappears in the face of laboratories’ objectives: interview with Kevin Vezirian
Animal testing

On 29 November 2022, Kevin Vezirian obtained the title of Doctor in Social Psychology with a research thesis on the study of animal testing from a social psychological perspective. Is the violence inflicted on animals linked to violence between humans? Are those who practise animal testing void of empathy? All of the answers are given by this specialist in the field.

You have just obtained your PhD in Social Psychology. What does this mean in concrete terms?

A doctorate (or PhD) is a university diploma issued at the end of working on scientific research. In concrete terms, in my case, this means that I have led research work in social psychology, a scientific discipline aiming to understand and explain how individuals’ thoughts and behaviours are influenced by the presence of others. More specifically, my research work consisted of studying individual factors and contextual frameworks that facilitate and justify prejudices towards laboratory animals, through social psychology theories.

Throughout the thesis, you make a link between discrimination between groups of humans and the mistreatment that other animals are victims of. Is this link scientifically well established?

The link between the way in which individuals behave towards each other and the way in which they behave towards animals is already well established. For example, extensive literature shows that there is a strong relation between cruelty towards animals and interpersonal violence. However, growing evidence suggests that there is in fact an interrelation between discrimination with regard to individuals and attitudes and behaviours towards animals. Thus, research shows that individuals having strong negative prejudice towards another due to their ethnicity are also more likely to agree strongly with speciesism, an ideology that defends the idea that all animal species do not deserve the same moral considerations and that the exploitation of certain animals is justified. Recent research led by a team of researchers from the University of Oxford incidentally shows that adhering to speciesist ideologies has a positive correlation with other types of discrimination such as racism, sexism, or even homophobia.

Despite these intriguing results, in reality it is not surprising to note that the manner in which individuals perceive members from discriminated groups is closely linked to the way in which they perceive animals, because after all, animals themselves have all the characteristics of discriminated individuals and are exploited because of who they are.

Where does animal testing fit in in this field?

Animal testing involves relying on animal models to lead experiments, the majority of the time for scientific purposes, which we prefer not to carry out on humans for ethical or moral reasons. Animal testing thus strongly involves considerations that we have for a specific social group, humans, compared to those we have for another social group, laboratory animals. While numerous surveys show that the majority of the population is opposed to the use of laboratory animals, there is some variability when it comes to the perceived legitimacy of this practice, and it appears necessary to understand where these interindividual and contextual differences come from. Furthermore, animal testing is carried out to the detriment of the animals that we should be motivated to protect from suffering, and it is vital to understand what the behavioural strategies that allow individuals to rationalise and legitimise their use for scientific purposes are, while it is almost always synonymous with dire purposes. It is a safe bet that the answers to our questions are found in the way we perceive and interact with others, and the social psychology is very pertinent in this respect.

Are those who practise animal testing therefore devoid of empathy? If not, how do they manage to inflict this suffering on animals?

Devoid of empathy, probably not. Incidentally, in our research, in reality we have no data regarding the empathetical disposition of laboratory technicians, therefore we cannot give any clear answers in this respect. On the other hand, our research indicates that in the general population, the least empathetic dispositions are actually associated with a greater perceived legitimacy of animal testing, but also of more harmful behaviours towards a laboratory animal within pharmaceutical research.

As for knowing how people come to inflict suffering on animals for scientific purposes, our research provides some answers. By taking inspiration from Stanley Milgram’s protocol, we invited people to conduct (fake) pharmaceutical research on a (fake) laboratory animal, and our results showed that the preliminary focus on the benefits of science would also significantly increase individuals’ motivation to participate in research to the detriment of the animal, but also that strong pro-scientific dispositions were strongly linked to the perceived legitimacy of the experiment and the instrumental vision of a laboratory animal. In summary, this research showed that pursuing scientific aims allowed temporary alleviation of empathetic considerations that individuals had with regard to laboratory animals in order to facilitate their use for research purposes and in the pursuit of research. In other research currently being done, we have also shown that disparagement strategies for laboratory animals’ mental and cognitive capacities can be used in order to justify the use of laboratory animals. While making another suffer goes against our most fundamental moral principles, we have shown that individuals can be motivated to reduce the mental capacities and the sentience of a laboratory animal in order to make its use more morally acceptable in some way.

Armed with the knowledge gained from your research, what course of action would you recommend in order for the situation to improve for these animals?

Our research shows that the scientific objectives behind animal testing allow moral considerations that individuals have towards laboratory animals to reduce. However, we must reiterate that animal testing is not only criticised by animal advocates, but also by a part of the scientific community who question its validity, its lack of replicability, or very weak pharmaceutical applications in humans. We imagine that communication and information campaigns questioning the legitimacy and usefulness of animal testing could thus ensure that individuals do not blindly justify the suffering of laboratory animals under the pretext that significant benefits for human health would be key, because it is not always so clear.

Furthermore, our research also shows that animals’ cognitive and mental capacities are central in moral considerations towards them, and the more we perceive their capacity for sentience and intelligence, the more they endure in laboratories what seems to us to be morally unjustified and unacceptable. Therefore, awareness campaigns around the originality of laboratory animals, showing their cognitive abilities and personality, could somehow impart greater moral considerations on them and perhaps further motivate individuals to oppose this practice.

Translated from the French by Joely Justice

The State has decided: permanent circuses and cheap zoos are coming

The State has decided: permanent circuses and cheap zoos are coming

The State has decided: permanent circuses and cheap zoos are coming
13.07.2023
France
The State has decided: permanent circuses and cheap zoos are coming
Exploitation for shows

We have been warning of this danger for four years. It is here: the ministerial decree has just appeared and confirms the fact that competency certificates (a way into allowing the keeping of wild animals) for circuses and other travelling trainers are equal to those for settled establishments; in other words, zoos. A critical analysis… of the law and the consequences for animals.

One Voice: a whistle blower on circuses

As a precursor in France on this subject, the Association has been defending elephants, bears, hippopotamuses, lions, and tigers in circuses in particular for almost twenty-five years. Our expertise has been developed over the experience we have gained by fighting for them.

Some are born free and captured, others are born behind bars; all are forcefully subdued from their first weeks of life, shut into lorries day and night, transported from town to town whether it be in stifling heat or wintry cold… What undignified and humiliating treatment must they suffer, once they are an adult, for them to be left like this? When you are a tiger, a family of lions, or an elephant, it takes terror to be submissive to primates in this way…

The business of lies

This is what the circus trainers have been hiding from the public, journalists, and public decision-makers since the dawn of time, and what we as advocates for animals and the planet strive to prove with forceful videos of this abuse, which we have referred to the legal system to ensure, not only that the law be respected, but also improved.

Preserving the natural habitat of these vulnerable species

These demeaning shows sell a misleading reality, in which those being held captive and exploited are happy in such a situation, and in which it is normal to show this to our children. In reality, it is the survival of an archaic tradition that we should be ashamed of. That of the uninhibited and absolute domination of humans over non-humans. Incidentally, it takes these creatures away from their natural habitat despite them being in serious decline.

A flimsy law

In 2019, already, during discussions at the Ministry for the Ecological Transition to prepare for measures being announced for wildlife being kept captive in lorries and circuses, and the law that followed in November 2021, we explained the risk of zoos being obtained at a discounted rate whilst travelling circuses are settling. And this is, no more or less, what is happening before our eyes with the publication, on 13 July 2023, of the ministerial decree establishing an equivalence between competency certificates for circus trainers and those from zoos, thus now allowing trainers to obtain competency certificates for animals that they could not keep previously in travelling circuses, such as giraffes for example. It will not take much more to trample all over the zoo decree of 2004.

The most obvious negative effect of this law is that is has given the impression to the whole of France (or even Europe) that it would represent a major step forward for animals, even though it was only a façade did nothing but discourage goodwill and made little difference to people’s actions. Just like in 2015 with the inclusion of animal sentience in the law, without changing their status as movable property.

Sordid winter living spaces soon to be considered as zoos

With this new law, it is a further step towards minuscule living spaces over winter in places considered as zoos, as the Médrano Circus in Aimargues attempted (unsuccessfully thanks to our vigilance).

But what we prevented then may soon be unpreventable in future… Because after an equivalent competency certificate, we foresee harmful changes to come on regulatory standards being dragged down with the trampling of the 2004 decree regulating zoos.

The State is an accomplice in exploitation

We condemn the deafening silence and inaction of the Ministry regarding sanctuaries for large land or sea mammals, as well as their delay in publishing implementing decrees of the law, particularly regarding the reproduction of big cats. Only the one on the CNCFSC was published. In the meantime, circus trainers are getting rid of elephants and making big cats reproduce with all their might to feed trafficking.

We will keep rallying for all captive animals in circuses and are asking for accountability from the Ministry who is supposed to be in charge of protecting them.

Translated from the French by Joely Justice

Law on restoring nature: the European Parliament has passed an encouraging but weak law

Law on restoring nature: the European Parliament has passed an encouraging but weak law

Law on restoring nature: the European Parliament has passed an encouraging but weak law
13.07.2023
Europe
Law on restoring nature: the European Parliament has passed an encouraging but weak law
Natural habitat

On 12 July, the European Parliament voted in plenary session in favour of the law on restoring nature. Despite amendments being passed which partly voided the law of its substance, this victory remains a great step forward for animals, nature, and our life on earth

We joyfully followed the well-attended vote on the Law on the Restoration of Nature on Wednesday 12 July. 336 MEPs finally voted in favour of the law in opposition to the 300 against. Even if it did not gain the votes we had hoped for, this result nonetheless represents a great victory given the ferocious opposition’s campaign led by the conservatives behind PPE, a right-centre group.

Amendments that cause harm to the ecological emergency voted in by citizens

The law passed is nevertheless weakened greatly by the lack of cohesion at EU level on this subject, which is in fact crucial for a liveable future on earth. Numerous amendments voted in have reduced the initial aims of the European Commission. The European Parliament has notably removed the proposed article on the restoration of agricultural land, which includes the restoration of peat lands, thus renouncing a crucial lever for increasing member States’ capacities to stock carbon. MEPs have also given in to Conservatives’ warnings by passing an amendment that will delay the implementation of the law until an evaluation of the one on European food safety has been carried out.

We remain committed to defending this European Green Deal with the support of more than one million citizens who have supported the law on the restoration of nature rallying in response to the call from more than 200 associations including us. And with our partners within the European Bureau, we are now calling on EU institutions (Parliament, Commission, and Council) to come forward in favour of a definitive law that meets environmental challenges during their tripartite negotiations.

Translated from the French by Joely Justice

Underground hunting with hounds in summer: five new victories for badgers!

Underground hunting with hounds in summer: five new victories for badgers!

Underground hunting with hounds in summer: five new victories for badgers!
12.07.2023
France
Underground hunting with hounds in summer: five new victories for badgers!
Wildlife

This summer, diggers in Aisne, Ille-et-Vilaine, Savoie, Haute-Loire, and Loir-et-Cher (as well as all the other departments) have to find something to do instead of torturing animals. These victories pave the way more than ever for an end to digging out in the spring and summer, in addition to those authorised during the remainder of the year. And the fight is far from being over: hearings are already set in the days to come in the Corrèze, Cantal, Allier and Seine-et-Marne, Maine-et-Loire, and Creuse Departments.

This year, we have decided to position ourselves as a force to be reckoned with in the fight against underground hunting with hounds, filing emergency interim suspension hearings either alone and anywhere where decrees start additional periods between 15 May and 1 July, or by joining forces with our partners*.

An unprecedented success for badger cubs and their parents

3500: that is the number of badgers that our legal action has currently allowed to be spared, in 19 out of 24 departments. Each victory is more satisfying than the last when we know the cruelty of this hobby that our infiltration investigation has shown fully and the difficulty in convincing jurisdictions despite this practice being rejected by more than 4 in 5 French people (Ipsos/One Voice survey, October 2022).

In the five departments where we have just won, hundreds of badger families would have been wiped out following long hours of being hunted. Female badgers and their young killed at point-blank range, after having tried in vain to flee to the depths of their setts, their refuge that they took months to build and which hunters would destroy in a few hours.

In Loir-et-Cher, the Orléans Administrative Tribunal has once again swept away the arguments conjured up by the Prefecture. A relief largely shared by local elected representatives invested with us and in this fight such as the Town Mayor, Catherine Le Troquier. 150 to 200 individuals spared! To which we can add the 250 to 300 in Ille-et-Vilaine, 150 in Aisne, and several dozen in Haute-Loire….

Victories that do not spell the end of the fight

Faced with our determination, several departments have chosen to abandon their draft decrees. In Savoie, after a dismal failure (it only took a few hours for the urgent applications judge to render their decision!), the State Representative simply decided not to authorise underground hunting with hounds from 1 July, as he had been about to do! In Vienne, our victory also forced the Prefecture to back down.

In the weeks to come, the following hearings are scheduled: 17 July at the Limoges Administrative Tribunal (for Corrèze), 18 July in Clermont-Ferrand (for Allier and Cantal), on 25 July in Melun (for Seine-et-Marne), on 27 July in Nantes (for Maine-et-Loire), and on 1 August in Dijon (for Creuse).

The prefects will always find us in their way to defend badgers. More than ever, we need your help to give them a voice. Sign our petitions for a radical reform of hunting, for a ban on underground badger hunting with hounds, and to change their image!

Support our fight for badgers

*One Voice’s partner associations for the hearings mentioned: Allier: Animal Cross, AVES, FNE 03, FNE AURA, LPO AURA; Aisne, Creuse, Ille-et-Vilaine, Maine-et-Loire, and Seine-et-Marne: AVES; Cantal: Animal Cross, AVES, FNE 15, FNE AURA, LPO AURA; Haute-Loire: AVES, FNE 43, FNE AURA, LPO AURA; Savoie: Animal Cross, FNE 73, LPO AURA.

Translated from the French by Joely Justice

Animal testing: some are clinging onto forced swimming for rats and mice

Animal testing: some are clinging onto forced swimming for rats and mice

Animal testing: some are clinging onto forced swimming for rats and mice
12.07.2023
France
Animal testing: some are clinging onto forced swimming for rats and mice
Animal testing

Australia and England have recently missed the opportunity to ban forced swimming tests inflicted upon rodents in their laboratories. Incomprehensible decisions with regard to the suffering caused by these experiments, the efficacy of which has not even been proven. In France, we continue to fight against these methods that are defended tooth and nail by the animal testing industry, which, clearly, has no boundaries.

In January, the New South Wales Government disappointed Australia. When it was questioned on the possibility of ‘quickly’ banning forced swimming tests, they turned a blind eye to animal welfare advocates and accepted that these experiments would continue as long as they are “duly justified”. A very vague condition for allowing rodents in clear distress to be immersed for minutes on end in a bowl of water with no possibility of escaping…

Procedures maintained against all logic

A response from England on the same subject has been expected for months. On 5 July, the Animal Science Committee (ASC) published its “advice” on the solution of forced swimming, reaffirming the testing industry’s use of it when all of the warning lights are flashing.

The British equivalent of the French Comité national de réflexion éthique sur l’expérimentation animale (CNREEA) [National Consultative Ethics Committee] also recognised that the projects using these tests do not explain why they are necessary and consciously forget to define their methodology, but also that nothing has confirmed that these procedures can help in finding novel antidepressants. Worse, they could make us miss out on interesting new medications according to a publication by a scientific journal on alternatives to forced swimming tests. Added to the immense stress felt by the animals during these experiments, these arguments should hit the target, but they do not. Against all logic, the ASC states that the use of forced swimming is, in principle, valid in studying the neurobiology of stress and accepts that it is used for testing antidepressants. And this even despite the fact that alternative methods exist and deserve to be developed, whatever the committee might say.

Nothing, not even the fact that members of staff at the laboratories have reported the deaths of rodents from inhaling water following tests in Australia, has convinced the ASC to rule in favour of the animals being subjected to these experiments.

The fight for animals being tested on continues

In France, we are continuing to fight so that rats, who are intelligent, empathetic, and playful beings, can be saved from these drowning simulations. To come to their aid, we are doing everything we can to obtain information and recent footage of the use of forced swimming in our country. This is a sizeable task, given that projects continue to be approved by the Ministry of Research and the animal testing industry is doing everything they can to be as impenetrable as possible.

By 25 July, we hope that the European Commission will give a favourable response to the Save Cruelty Free Cosmetics European Citizens’ Initiative as well as for the 10 million animals who pass through the walls of European laboratories every year.

Translated from the French by Joely Justice

A wolf hit by a train in Drôme

A wolf hit by a train in Drôme

A wolf hit by a train in Drôme
11.07.2023
Drôme
A wolf hit by a train in Drôme
Wildlife

A wolf was found dead on Monday 3 July in the morning, on the edge of the railway tracks in Crozes-Hermitage in Drôme. In France, wolves are faced with multiple threats: slaughtered by shots – even though they belong to a protected species -, poaching, and also road accidents.

According to the autopsy, it was an adult male weighing 32kg, deceased following a collision with a train. However, on photos circulating on social media, the body of the poor creature seemed to be in a relatively good state after such an impact…

Dozens of wolves victims of collisions every year

Since the start of 2023, at least five of them have died in this way: in Seine-et-Marne on 11 January, two days later in the Calanques National Park, on 17 January near Grande-Motte, and on 22 March in Loire. Then at the beginning of July, this new victim was mowed down by a train.

Another, knocked down in January, survived the impact, but was never found. Most certainly injured, it is likely that it died due to its injuries…

Since these are accidents, drivers are not at risk. It is therefore easy for some of those who dislike wolves to pretend that the collisions are by chance when in reality they are deliberately trying to get rid of wolves with their vehicles… This is what happened a few months ago in Haute-Savoie, when a driver tried to run one of them over. Video recordings fortunately allowed those implicated to be found and they will be judged at a trial in the coming months, at which we will be a civil party in the wolf’s memory.

Hide these wolves out of sight

Even though the lupine population is in decline, as revealed by the count by the French Office for Biodiversity a few days ago, the State continues to slaughter them without even taking into consideration those who die from accidents caused by humans. Worse, the administration responsible for monitoring these slaughters has even decided to no longer disclose the annual number of wolves found dead by accidental, natural, or undetermined causes.

Up until 2019, this data was communicated by the DREAL [Regional Directorate for Environment, Development, and Housing] in Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes. In 2018 and 2019, 27 and 20 wolves respectively were found dead in these conditions. These figures are now glossed over. In fact, when we know that the quota of individuals to be slaughtered increases year on year, it is better to try to reduce their responsibility for this massacre by trying to make people forget that wolves die from many other causes as well.

Join us in our fight: sign our petition to say stop persecuting wolves!

Translated from the French by Joely Justice

Hunting: a weapon of mass pollution

Hunting: a weapon of mass pollution

Hunting: a weapon of mass pollution
07.07.2023
France
Hunting: a weapon of mass pollution
Wildlife

A few months ago, the Fédération nationale des chasseurs (FNC) [National Federation of Hunters] was condemned for having presented its members as the “first ecologists in France” (which the French have never believed!). And we understand why: this hobby leads not only to the death of more than 25 million animals every year, but, the cherry on the cake, it pollutes the earth by depositing 6000 to 8000 tonnes of lead. This ammunition left in nature is an instant danger to the environment, animals, and humans, the dramatic consequences of which are already being seen. In Ain, One Voice found out from the Prefecture that lead shots replaced with steel ammunition in a clay-pigeon shoot had been organised in a wetland last weekend. But with checks being rare, we have no illusions about the changed course of this, knowing that this annual polluting festivity has taken place for more than twenty years on the same land.

From hunting to clay-pigeon shooting: a short guide on polluting activities by hunters in France

Sometimes – or dare we say often? -, hunters miss their targets. Thousands of lead bullets are therefore spread throughout the earth and water courses, making them potentially infertile and toxic, in particular for us humans. When animals feed on them, they are almost certain to die: a duck that ingests four small balls of this dense metal has a 99% chance of dying in the next twenty days. Other times, animals are affected without being killed. They have to live with shots throughout their bodies causing illnesses and infections – a body which will then be ingested by their natural predators, such as lynx, which are protected. One animal at a time, this heavy metal, a true poison, gains ground.

And it does not stop there: outside of the season, they have to be careful! There is still one activity left: clay-pigeon shooting. Shooting at a clay disk is undoubtedly less amusing than shooting at an animal. But it is “better than nothing”. This very lucrative activity in itself leads to 1,500 tonnes of lead being dispersed in nature every year.

An event in Ain that has been harmful for the environment for two decades

In Ain, the Douvres Hunting Society has been organising an annual clay-pigeon shoot in close proximity to a water course for at least twenty years. In other words, for all these years, the earth and groundwater tables have been riddled with this heavy metal… Also in this region in 2014, it was revealed in the autopsy of a lynx cadaver that it was suffering from lead poisoning because its body had more than 120 bullets in it. Having been alerted to the event taking place on the weekend of 1 July, we immediately contacted the Prefecture, who told us they got hunters to only use steel ammunition. Hard to believe, when we know that the guns used for clay-pigeon shooting are not adapted for this type of cartridge.

Beyond the pollution, this event should never have taken place. In fact, the Ain Prefect herself banned the carrying and transportation of weapons in the Department between 30 June and 3 July due to national current events. Despite this, these Sunday shooters have been able to indulge in their hobby without any disturbance!

Who knows, perhaps hunters were able to convince her that it was absolutely essential to “regulate” the clay discs…

General rallying against the ravages of hunting on nature

Of course, since February 2023, the use of cartridges is banned in close proximity to wetlands. But this measure is largely insufficient. With the European Environment Bureau, a coalition that One Voice is a member of, we are asking the European Commission to go further with the restrictions on lead in ammunition and fishing accessories. Because fish are also as important as mammals. The very survival of millions of animals and protecting human health is at stake!

As usual, hunters will do everything they can not to have to follow the rules. In January 2023, environmental police officers had apparently received no instructions on implementing checks[1]. The law? A tiny detail when it comes to pleasing a small minority who want to kill yet more animals. And they don’t stop there! Willy Schraen (FNC President) went so far as to ask for financial support from the State so that his members could replace their guns at taxpayers’ expense. The indecency clearly has no limit.

While the effects of massive soil pollution are already being felt by biodiversity and human health, it is about time we act. More than ever, it is about supporting the interests of animals, humans, and nature with one voice. Standing bravely with our partners, we will continue working to protect life on earth, for which whistle-blowers and conservationists are too often targeted. For them, for us, nothing will stop us. On 12 July at the European Parliament, we will call on Members of the European Parliament to pass the European Law on the restoration of nature.

[1] Source: chassons.com site, « Plomb interdit à la chasse: Vers un possible report? » [Lead banned in hunting: for a possible adjournment?] article of 4 January 2023: “Indeed, for the time being, no agent from the French Office for Biodiversity (OFB) has received clear instructions on the implementation of checks on the use of ammunition for which they will be responsible.”

Translated from the French by Joely Justice

One Voice is calling for the European law to restore nature to be passed

One Voice is calling for the European law to restore nature to be passed

One Voice is calling for the European law to restore nature to be passed
05.07.2023
European Union
One Voice is calling for the European law to restore nature to be passed
Natural habitat

Faced with a divide at the European Parliament’s Committee on Environment, Public Health, and Food Safety (ENVI), we have once again called for a vote on the ambitious law on restoring nature. For humans, as for all other animals, the fight for a viable future on our planet must not be compromised.

In June, Members of Parliament from the ENVI Committee failed twice to agree on the law on restoring nature. The scope of the law was even reduced over the course of discussions, with a reduction in the revision of the global objective, the deletion of the article for restoring forest ecosystems, and even a limit on restoration actions in Natura 2000 areas.

A diluted but not abandoned draft law

During the two committee votes, on 15 and 27 June, the political parties present were found to be the same. The draft law was thus narrowly saved, but we are very disappointed that it was not supported enthusiastically by the whole ENVI Committee.

On 15 June, the day of the first vote, the attack by the Parti Populaire Européen [PPE – European People’s Party] (a centre-right group) was also particularly virulent: they had replaced four members of their group, who were in favour of the draft law and who could have swung the vote, by four others who were not. The Committee eventually refused the amendment, asking for a pure and simple rejection of the law due to a draw, with 44 votes for and 44 votes against. And on 27 June, during the final vote on the law’s preliminary report, the Committee once again failed to obtain an absolute majority. The law was therefore saved, but we did not get a victory.

A violent opposition

The opposition of conservatives, who accused the project of harming food safety despite their arguments having been rejected by scientists, do not condemn the law to failure, however. The passing of the law in plenary by the European Parliament on 12 July will offer elected representatives the chance to speak out for a more coherent and ambitious law and to show their support for the European Green Deal. While temperatures continue to climb and biodiversity is demolished, taking strong measures on a European level is necessary.

«Conservative elected representatives’ refusal to work for what they have been elected for, namely, to pass strong laws to fight against the biodiversity and climate crises, is disappointing to say the least. This assessment is particularly pertinent after the powerful message from the Council, who took a stance on the Law for the Restoration of Nature last week and invited the European Parliament to follow up on negotiating said law. We urge our elected representatives to respond to this invitation and to take a strong position in plenary immediately.»Sergiy Moroz, Policy Manager for Water and Biodiversity at the European Environmental Bureau (EBB)

A single voice for all living things

For months on end, the European Environmental Bureau (EEB), which One Voice is a member of, has been rallying against global warming, the loss of biodiversity, and pollution, and asking for this law to be passed, not only to restore nature but also in accordance with our well-being and a genuine reflection on the social aspect, in the context of a global crisis. This positioning is in agreement with our fight to protect all living things. Since 2018, we have actively participated in climate marches. And last May, we were in Stockholm for the Common Future Conference: for a European Green Deal 2 organised by the EEB, where the main priorities of the work were set out for the years to come.

On 11 July, a rally will take place in front of the European Parliament in Strasbourg from 8am to 9am. The collective representing the EEB and our partners WWF, BirdLife, and ClientEarth will also be there to officially hand over almost one million messages sent to Members of the European Parliament during our #RestoreNature campaign.

The following day, in plenary, we will call on MEPs to vote in favour of a future for all.

Translated from the French by Joely Justice

The Wolf Plan: a planned failure

The Wolf Plan: a planned failure

The Wolf Plan: a planned failure
05.07.2023
France
The Wolf Plan: a planned failure
Wildlife

Following the announcement of the decrease in the number of wolves in France, the presentation of the new National Action Plan 2024-2029 on wolves and farming activities (commonly known as the ‘Wolf Plan’) that was initially scheduled for 3 July has been postponed… Is the State realising that not only do wolves not ‘proliferate’, contrary to what farmers, hunters, and some elected representatives try to make us believe (incidentally in total contradiction with wolves’ biology, who only reproduce once a year and whose cubs’ survival rate is around 60%), but that this strategy for slaughtering animals classified as vulnerable is contrary to the protected species status that they have been given?

While the completion date for the 2018-2023 plan is near, the first observations that can be taken from it are alarming on all levels: a decrease in the number of wolves but an increase in attacks on farms. This proves that fatal shots are not effective – and even counter productive, as we have highlighted several times over – and that the emphasis must be put onto protection measures, particularly for bovine herds who benefit from an inexplicable exemption. The problem of straying dogs must incidentally be looked at seriously.

The State has more and more wolves slaughtered then is surprised that their population decreases

Although there has still not yet been any official communication from the State relaying information, farmers’ unions had already been aware for several days and were rebelling: the number of wolves making it out of the 2022-2023 winter had decreased. 906 were counted, which is 15 less than the year before at the same time.

While this should delight those who dislike them, here they are – what a surprise – contesting the count, which according to them is below the reality. The figures are only exact when this works in favour of their misleading and harmful communication.

If it did not involve the death of several dozen wolves each year, the situation would almost be laughable. The State, who each year increase the quota to be slaughtered (going from 51 in 2018 to 174 for 2023!), finds themselves very embarrassed now that they have realised that killing more and more individuals puts the survival of the entire species in danger, even though it still has not reached the minimum threshold of wolves needed for it to be viable. However, in 2020, we warned the government that their population’s growth had slowed in France.

Presentation of the Wolf Plan delayed

The lack of a reaction from the administration and policies on the subject certainly indicate some embarrassment from the government, who have given in to pressure from the agricultural lobby leading this dance.

Caught up in this news that was unveiled a few days before the presentation of the main priorities of the 2024-2029 plan, those deciding have finally agreed to postpone the communication until 4 September. But still no official statement: the information was found in various agricultural media, whose lobby has access to the government…

It is easy to deduce from this report that the announcements to be made on 3 July will certainly compromise wolves’ survival even more, by relaxing conditions for shooting or authorising the slaughter of an even larger number of them. We therefore imagine that the outline will be reviewed urgently to try to justify as far as possible the fatal shots on a protected species that is in decline, and which, furthermore, has been wiped out in France once already.

Until then, and as long as these lethal shots are happening, we will continue to ensure that minimum conditions for authorising exemptions are met. We systematically condemn this abuse and slaughtering. We will never stop. Sign our petition to call for the end of wolves’ persecution.

Translated from the French by Joely Justice